How do Presidents React to Presidential Subpoenas?
Comparing the reactions from Presidents Jefferson and Trump.
Comparing the reactions from Presidents Jefferson and Trump.
The ex-students had accused the professors (at the City University of New York) of sexual assault and other misconduct.
A question that is harder to answer than it may seem.
Philosopher Aeon Skoble provides a helpful explanation.
An analysis finds that Trump is both more stingy and more self-serving than his predecessors in how he has used the pardon power to date
None of these theories fully account for the Chief Justice's decisions, though the strategic maximizer view may come closest.
Wild horses, ankle stomps, and covert tweets.
"The Roberts court, alas, only sang from the judiciary’s score. The executive’s verses fell silent."
The full history of the proceedings, not the sanitized version presented in Trump v. Vance
Universities should have been prepared for the possibility that ICE would not continue to decline to enforce an existing rule.
The professor, the chair of the Central Michigan University journalism department, was teaching a media law class, and quoted a case that discussed the use of the word "nigger" at public universities.
The Court GVR's other contraceptive mandate cases, but grants the FHFA and First Amendment cases
... and, fortunately for me, not playing chess.
holds the Second Circuit in a case rejecting a libel lawsuit over a blog post headline.
It must be nice to have John Marshall on your side.
The article critiques the majority decision, and outlines a better way to limit Congress' subpoena power.
Recent data from Minneapolis show an increase in shooting crimes but not other crimes, the same pattern as in Chicago in 2016. The likely reason is a reduction in police street stops, just as in Chicago in 2016.
Vance strikes me as compelling and correct. Mazars creates a complex and unwieldy balancing test.
The bizarre reaction to the anti-cancel culture letter.
The Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's claims of immunity, but reaffirmed limits on investigatory powers, and ruled in favor of Native American tribal claims against Oklahoma.
Tax Return Thursday is on deck.
A federal court in California has allowed a First Amendment challenge to go forward, and the reasoning suggests that the plaintiff will eventually win.
On the penultimate day of the October 2019 term, the Supreme Court expands the ministerial exception and upholds exemptions to the contraception coverage mandate.
ICE's recent decision to bar foreign students enrolled at universities with online-only classes is the tip of the iceberg of a much larger problem.
A complaint filed in MA district court alleges violations of the APA
Marbury v. Madison does not support modern severability doctrine.
The Court's conservatives are sharply divided on severability.
A book review of "The Republican Reversal: Conservatives and the Environment from Nixon to Trump" by James Morton Turner and Andrew C. Isenberg
The Supreme Court papered over important differences between the Washington and Colorado cases.
ICE announces sweeping changes to the temporary modifications in effect
Posted at the Harper's Magazine site.
In the New York Times I explain that the Chief Justice Roberts we've seen this term is the same one we've seen before.
"John Marshall is not walking through that door." But what exactly did John Marshall say?
Justice Gorsuch does not agree with, or even cite, Reed v. Town of Gilbert.
I am skeptical how many current students actually want to learn on campus this fall. When push come to shove, they will realize that in-person instruction is too risky.