Med School Professor Removed from Fellowship Director Post, Apparently for Publishing Anti-Affirmative-Action Journal Article
This happened at University of Pittsburgh, a public university.
This happened at University of Pittsburgh, a public university.
The suit was based on an Esquire article about an Iowa farm run by members of Congressman Nunes' family.
But the judge threw out the prosecution, on the ground that the order violated the First Amendment.
Or, Virginia is for lovers, not libel tourists.
or from one's house of worship or from the nursing board.
in challenge to Maryland's handgun license requirement.
The court rejects the claims that Ohio's ballot-access laws have become unconstitutionally coercive due to the pandemic.
A response to my co-blogger Josh Blackman.
Here are five steps Chief Justice Roberts can take to bring the Court back in order. If by next July, Roberts cannot step up to this challenge—either through his own ineptitude or his own malfeasance—then he should step down from the Court.
The law is a step in the right direction, but has significant limitations, that should be a warning sign for future reform efforts.
Law schools should be very, very careful before imposing loyalty pledges and flawed social science testing on faculty and students.
Trump's Tweet ("A sketch years later about a nonexistent man. A total con job, playing the Fake News Media for Fools (but they know it)!") was opinion, and thus not actionable.
Universities can ask members of the community to stay safe during the COVID pandemic. But they cannot prescribe what shall be orthodox.
The most important elements of the Supreme Court leaks.
Yet again, the Chief Justice shows his distaste for preliminary injunctions.
Apple permits, laser beams, and Nazis in Skokie.
The reason is Trump's recent tweet calling for postponement of the election.
That rule applies to Steve Calabresi, and Student Chapters.
Last week's open thread seemed fun and interesting (and drew >250 comments), so I thought I'd do it again.
That's what an Eleventh Circuit opinion seems to suggest, in a case where a Trinidadian Muslim plaintiff said she "come[s] from a strict Muslim household where under [their] cultural beliefs and traditions such a sexual assault would have the tendency to bring shame and humiliation upon [her] family."
Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh concurred in the grant of the stay. Sotomayor and Ginsburg dissented. What about Justices Thomas, Breyer, and Kagan?
Part IV is mostly a rehash of Part III, though we learn that RBG is only telling some of members about her health.
Look for the full appellate court to send the case back to the trial court - which is where it belongs.
Could such "gun violence restraining orders" likewise be used against people who talk about violence and a "pig problem" or "fascist problem" as opposed to "n■■■, k■■■, and h■■■ problem" (expurgation in news video)?
That's what a motion in the St. Louis Mark & Patricia McCloskey case argues.
Justices Breyer and Kagan flex their moderate muscles to narrow Guadalupe and Little Sisters, but cannot persuade the stubborn Chief Justice on Espinoza
Some people arrested in Portland for misdemeanor failure to obey a lawful order have had these conditions imposed as a condition of being released before trial. But the law related to such conditions is surprisingly complex.
After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.