Can Trump Broker a TikTok Sale Before the April 5 Deadline?
The president seems optimistic. It's not clear why.
The president seems optimistic. It's not clear why.
Extending the deadline gives TikTok a temporary lifeline, but the real issue—government overreach in tech and speech regulation—still needs a congressional fix.
But at least he restored respect for a tariff-loving predecessor by renaming a mountain.
"Every day I confront a bill that wants to ban another Chinese company," the Kentucky senator tells Reason.
A unanimous Supreme Court decision established as much in 1965.
Plus: Fauci preemptively pardoned, hostages released, Inauguration Day, and more...
While pledging to postpone the ban by executive order, the incoming president said the government should have a 50-percent ownership stake in the app.
The popular video app restored service in the U.S. after President-elect Donald Trump promised to postpone a federal ban.
With just hours to go before it is set to shut down, many senators and representatives are still posting on the app they claim is too dangerous for the rest of us to use.
"I cannot profess the kind of certainty I would like to have about the arguments and record before us," writes Justice Gorsuch.
The Supreme Court appears poised to uphold a ban on the app, but many creators aren't so sure.
Justice Neil Gorsuch criticized "the government's attempt to lodge secret evidence in this case." Still, things look grim for the app.
A TikTok ban could devastate thousands of independent workers, but the real challenge lies in modernizing labor laws to support the new economy.
The ban violates the First and Fifth Amendments. Strike it down.
Hannah Hiatt isn't the first parent to face child welfare investigations sparked by an internet mob.
It seems unlikely that five Justices will buy TikTok's First Amendment arguments when neither Judge Douglas Ginsburg nor Judge Neomi Rao nor Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan did so.
The popular but beleaguered social media app will have until January 19 to find an American buyer or be banned.
The rush to crack down on the young people making money on TikTok misses the real causes and possible effects of the social media influencer boom.
China's free speech record is bad, but the federal government's isn't so great either.
The plaintiffs hope to "help Republicans and conservatives see why this ban is inconsistent with the free speech values they say they care about."
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
Instead of lobbying for age verification and youth social media bans, parents can simply restrict their kids' smartphone use.
Plus: Masking protesters, how Google Search got so bad, Columbia's anti-apartheid protests of the '80s, and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors to steel man the case for the Jones Act, an antiquated law that regulates maritime commerce in U.S. waters.
Plus: Homework liberation in Poland, Orthodox rabbi tells students to flee Columbia, toddler anarchy, and more...
Banning companies for doing business with China is a bad path to start down.
The author of The Anxious Generation argues that parents, schools, and society must keep kids off of social media.
Plus: Mnuchin's TikTok folly, Trump's April Fools' joke, Andy Warhol's muse, and more...
Plus: A listener asks about Republicans and Democrats monopolizing political power in the United States.
"It's a disturbing gift of unprecedented authority to President Biden and the Surveillance State," said Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.).
Plus: Kamala Harris' abortion clinic visit, Karl Marx's hypocrisy, CDC data struggles, and more...
Instead of freeing Americans from censorship, the TikTok bill would tighten the U.S. government's control over social media.
Plus: TikTok ban, AOC primary challenger, DEI revisionism, and more...
Plus: Illegal immigrants at Whole Foods, AI predicting homelessness, Chinese espionage, and more...
A new bill would ban TikTok and give the president power to declare other social media apps off limits.
The errors are so glaring that it's hard not to suspect an underlying agenda at work here.
"It's not really a movement. Nobody is pushing it. People are just living it."
The ban, scheduled to take effect on January 1, is likely unconstitutional in multiple ways, the judge held.
Your tax-deductible donations help to make our next Remy video, powerhouse interview, and mind-blowing documentary possible.
The propensity of prosecutors to jump to conclusions before all the evidence is in is very destructive—and nothing new.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10