Michael Lewis: The Supreme Court Has Harmed the Culture of Free Speech by Deciding Too Much Stuff
Starting with Roe v. Wade, the bestselling author argues in Commentary, the high court has removed too many topics from legislative debate.
Starting with Roe v. Wade, the bestselling author argues in Commentary, the high court has removed too many topics from legislative debate.
The justices say the law's "unprecedented" and "staggering" scope violates the First Amendment.
"Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend."
Five terrible, perpetually recurring arguments, debunked.
One hundred years ago today, the U.S. government declared war on the First Amendment.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees asks SCOTUS to end mandatory public-sector union fees.
Intent on blocking visitors from Muslim-majority countries, the president confuses political incorrectness with seriousness.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Carpenter v. U.S. next term.
The decision highlights the importance of drawing distinctions among "sex crimes."
SCOTUS rejects "provocation doctrine," says illegal police search must be viewed separately from subsequent police use of force.
Should we interpret the Constitution as a living document?
Libertarians and conservatives agree on Trump's judicial picks so far. But how long will the harmony last?
The president's list includes executive power enthusiasts and a free-market advocate.
How many Fourth Amendment protections do we forfeit when we use a cell phone?
The Supreme Court is asked to give the third-party doctrine a second look.
"The tattoo itself, the process of tattooing, and the business of tattooing are forms of pure expression fully protected by the First Amendment."
A Yale professor illustrates the tendency to frame what should be critiques of government power as complaints about particular politicians.
The federal government says yes, but the Supreme Court seems skeptical.
The order's "facially unconstitutional directives and its coercive effects weigh heavily against leaving it in place."
SCOTUS may soon decide whether or not to hear arguments in Peruta v. California.
Supreme Court turns away transparency lawsuit trying to force release of Senate report.
Justice Sotomayor dissents from denial of certiorari in Salazar-Limon v. City of Houston.
If making people prove their innocence to get their property back violates due process, what about civil forfeiture?
Judge Janice Rogers Brown takes aim at Chevron deference.
A new film dramatizes the landmark Supreme Court decision on eminent domain.
For civil libertarians, the newest Supreme Court justice is better than the nominee who never got a hearing.
SCOTUS has delayed making a decision whether to tackle religious freedom claim.
How the new justice will impact the future of SCOTUS.
Neil Gorsuch confirmation vote expected Friday.
Comparing the two SCOTUS nominees.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
A lot of parliamentary shenanigans, but ultimately everything in the Senate is 'majority rules'
New York merchants are challenging a state law that dictates the way they describe prices.
A Supreme Court case shows how prosecutors get away with hiding evidence that could help defendants.
The Attorney General aims to dragoon state and local officials and leave them "no real option but to acquiesce."
Understanding the SCOTUS nominee's answers to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Today's religious freedom controversies got their start in the 19th century debate over outlawing polygamy.
The president dismisses his SCOTUS nominee's objections.
Does conviction for a crime mean a permanent ban?
Matt Welch and Thomas Massie among those on tonight's Kennedy
The SCOTUS nominee talks unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
What's happening on day two of Neil Gorsuch's SCOTUS confirmation hearings.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks