SCOTUS Says State Judges and Court Clerks Can't Be Sued To Block Enforcement of the Texas Abortion Ban
The Court allowed claims against health care regulators to proceed, but that will not prevent the private civil actions authorized by the law.
The Court allowed claims against health care regulators to proceed, but that will not prevent the private civil actions authorized by the law.
The Court rules that the lawsuit against SB 8 can proceed by targeting state licensing officials. But the implications for future cases are far from completely clear.
The private litigation against some defendants may proceed, but the federal lawsuit is gone.
The justices heard oral arguments this week in Carson v. Makin.
Regulators insist Fourth Amendment protections don’t apply to administrative searches.
The report doesn't endorse court-packing or term limits. But it's generally more favorable to the latter than the former. It also provides valuable overview of a wide range of SCOTUS-related issues.
Plus: A reminder to Bill de Blasio of what "incentive" really means
“All of those…just come out of Lochner.”
The justices may find it difficult to uphold Mississippi's abortion ban without overturning Roe v. Wade.
The oft-heard argument that something isn't "written in the Constitution" is not as compelling as it might seem. Sometimes, it's outright false.
The "viability" rule is arbitrary. So are the alternatives.
Vaping regulation gets some attention on the Shadow Docket
The argument made by Finnis, George, Hammer and others, that abortion is unconstitutional is not supported by text or history.
An electronic cigarette manufacturer seeks a stay of FDA action from the Supreme Court.
The Chief Justice has assumed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's role as the fastest opinion writer.
In recent years, the Supreme Court has rarely issued opinions in argued cases, and they were almost always written by RBG.
A delayed, but hopefully still helpful final rejoinder to Stephen Sachs.
Would the outcome in Dobbs put originalism in doubt?
A new case asks whether a Border Patrol agent may be sued for alleged First and Fourth Amendment violations.
Symposium issue in Constitutional Commentary now publicly accessible
The Supreme Court should reject a law that bars ordinary people from carrying guns for self-defense.
The slippery slope risks created by upholding SB 8 threaten a vital constitutional principle - one far more important than any considerations on the other side. That is sufficient reason to rule against Texas in this case.
"This is not just an obvious constitutional infringement—it's hard to imagine a more textbook violation of the First Amendment."
A majority of the Court voiced skepticism about the state’s conceal-carry licensing scheme.
Even justices who take a dim view of Roe v. Wade recognize the law’s chilling implications.
If Texas' SB 8 subterfuge works, it would be a dangerous road map for attacking other constitutional rights. The slippery slope risks on the other side are minor by comparison.
Today's Supreme Court oral argument suggests they will get the votes of six or more justices. If so, it will be a crucial victory for judicial protection of all constitutional rights, not just abortion rights.
Denver cops received qualified immunity after performing a warrantless search of a man’s tablet and trying to delete a video he took of them beating a suspect.
The justice grilled a Texas official over the implications of his state’s abortion law.
Do Americans have a right to know the extent that the government surveils them?
The Firearms Policy Coalition amicus brief offers a simple and effective way to neuter the threat to judicial review posed by SB 8.
However the Supreme Court handles the S.B. 8 litigation, it may unleash mischief in other policy areas.
An amicus brief in Whole Women's Health v. Jackson warns of how S.B. 8's structure could be used to target other constitutional rights.
A surprising grant of certiorari places a high-stakes regulatory case on the Court's docket, with profound implications for EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases.
The actual number of abortions that S.B. 8 prevented by the end of September may be closer to 500 than 3,000.
John Marion Grant convulsed and vomited as he was put to death.
The Supreme Court's notion of "fair notice," which it says requires blocking many civil rights lawsuits, is based on a demonstrably false assumption.
The idea that massive government spending, hate speech laws, and gun control will improve America—when they failed horribly elsewhere—is a dangerous myth.
Several groups urging the Supreme Court to overturn New York’s virtual ban on bearing arms emphasize the policy’s racist roots and racially disproportionate impact.
Imposing a wealth tax may not even be among the enumerated powers of Congress.
The justices will hear United States v. Texas and Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson on November 1.
The Court will hear oral argument in the two cases on November 1.
The Texas law “could just as easily be used by other States to restrict First or Second Amendment rights,” the Firearms Policy Coalition tells SCOTUS.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10