Federal Courts Still Lack Authority to Issue Advisory Opinions
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reminds us that there are limits to Article III.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reminds us that there are limits to Article III.
A divided circuit panel stays the district court's injunction against enforcing Ohio's law.
An interesting question divides a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
A three-judge panel concludes the rule's challenger are likely to succeed on the merits.
The Court's grant of certiorari is limited to only one of the issues in this litigation.
The court concludes states are likely to succeed in their procedural challenges to the Education Department's decision to extend Bostock to Title IX.
After a divided ruling, laws limiting such treatments in Tennessee and Kentucky will go into force.
Court finds parent's right to comment on their interactions with their child's coaches or teachers is cleartly established.
The Affordable Care Act's individual mandate penalty meets the bankcuptcy code.
A divided panel concludes the plaintiffs are unlikely to prevail on the merits and pledges to expedite the appeal.
A three-judge panel concludes that bump stocks cannot be considered machine gun parts under the rule of lenity.
A panel upheld a preliminary objection barring the Air force from requiring religious objectors to get Covid-19 vaccines, and a majority of the court's judges refused to vacate that decision as moot.
The Sixth Circuit rejects a suit against the jam maker for requiring employees to get the jab.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concludes the President exceeded the scope of his delegated authority.
Judges on The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit disagree over when Title IX claims accrue.
From the sounds of it, the Air Force's attorneys didn't think too carefully about how to respond to Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) claims.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit disagrees on whether the word "image" is ambiguous.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded some state challenges to the COVID relief bill were not justiciable, but reaches the merits in one case and finds the law lacking.
The Supreme Court often reverses the U.S. Court of Appeals in habeas cases, but not this time.
A divided panel concludes that government officials forced to testify at Flint Water Crisis civil trial did not waive their constitutional right against self-incrimination just because they had answered questions in depositions.
An important victory against "self-dealing" by state and local governments.
The en banc Sixth Circuit concludes that the lawsuit seeking an injunction against Michigan's mask mandate is now moot.
The sheriff's deputies are also not entitled to qualified immunity because the First Amendment right to offend police has been repeatedly upheld.
The question of whether to stay the BIden Administration rule requiring large employers to mandate vaccinations or testing is now before the Supreme Court.
The consequences of failing to preserve issues for appellate review.
A majority of judges on the court did not vote in favor of the petitions for initial hearing en banc, so the challenge will be heard by a three-judge panel
The district court decision upholding the ATF's conclusion that bump stocks constitute unlawful "machine guns" is upheld by an equally divided court.
Whether or not term limits for state legislators are wise, they are constitutional.
A petition has been filed asking the full court to hear the legal challenges to the OSHA COVID-19 vaccinate-or-test mandate.
As a result of the multi-district litigation lottery process, all of the challenges will be heard in a single circuit.
The full court will consider the proper standard for judicial review of COVID restrictions in religious institutions.
In dissent from denial of en banc rehearing, Judge Griffin notes the recent history of Supreme Court reversals of Sixth Circuit habeas decisions.
In two slightly different line-ups, the en banc court denied two habeas claims 9-7.
Contrary to what some claim, the Sixth Circuit was the first federal appellate court to issue a ruling on the merits of the CDC eviction moratorium.
Judge Thapar writes separately to note such requirements remain vulnerable under existing precedent.
What seems like a gun rights case actually presents some important questions of administrative law.
A divided panel grants a preliminary injunction against privileging relief applications based on the race or sex of the applicant.
The Sixth Circuit made quick work of a district court opinion concluding Ohio lacked standing to sue for overdue Census data.
A senior judge assails U.S. immigration policy and prompts a sharp response.
A liberal result (granting a criminal defendant's habeas petition) from a quite conservative judge (John Bush).
Today's grant of certiorari in Brown v. Davenport suggests we will see yet another Supreme Court reversal of a Sixth Circuit grant of a habeas petition.
This morning's summary reversal of a habeas petition grant in Mays v. Hines.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10