Here's Your Checks and Balances: NSA 'Continually' and 'Systematically' Violated FISA Court Limits
But it's fine because officials were informed
But it's fine because officials were informed
As much as the feds allow them to say, anyway
Now that it affects important people, she wants a full surveillance review
Officials did not want intercepted evidence used as evidence in trials
All that information at his fingertips and he still has little understanding of America
So much for that whole "oversight" thing
Clapper flip-flops, furloughs workers
"The American people are getting left with an inaccurate impression of the effectiveness of NSA programs," said Sen. Leahy
But decided against putting program into practice
Regardless of whether they are connected to any investigation
Information from the latest Snowden leak
Twelve reasons not to date an NSA worker
Would prohibit bulk record collection, install an advocate to argue before FISC
Case that prompted DOJ to secretly collect wire service's phone records
Closed to the public and not independent from those overseeing the programs
Regarding opinions on the constitutionality of Section 215 of the Patriot Act
He'll probably get all the details in a staff memo. Or perhaps he's already read all the presentations.
Works with state's Freedom of Information Commission
A blow to the secrecy of the no-fly list
There truly aren't enough "LOL"s for that one
Though he is concerned about privacy violations
Despite what we've been told
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
Can't have oversight when overseers aren't given information
Provide generic info when asking for permission to surveil from FISA court
And yes, they've accessed content
Yes, the guy caught lying to Congress about the scope of surveillance
Insists in the face of latest news that people's e-mails aren't being read.
Not just to or from certain targets, but about certain targets
Tax agency employees were told to remove any reference to tips provided by DEA group
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks