Insurers May Not Participate in Health Exchanges
Strict rules make them likely money-losers
Strict rules make them likely money-losers
Leaving D.C. holding a very full bag
Figuring it all out is a business opportunity for fine-print specialists
No obvious way to lure more physicians into the unwieldy program
Workers face tax penalties for refusing coverage that is "affordable" for individuals, but not families
Supposed to decide by Friday whether they'll have them
George Mason's Erik Angner on the libertarian economist's mostly unacknowledged support for redistribution.
Drop coverage? Reduce workers' hours?
Have higher costs to look forward to, presumably the sort of hope and change they all had in mind
Maybe they shouldn't have bothered, like many other states
Health savings accounts would have to be part of the deal
Smith and Nephew says the $25 million annual tab is unaffordable
Everything has to have detailed nutrition information, and that doesn't come free
Awkward numbers from the Congressional Budget Office
Firms can reduce costs by keeping workers below 30 hours per week
Critics say government can't pick and choose who gets religious exemptions
Published rules for implementing penalties for not buying insurance on Wednesday
The administration was hoping the IRS would fix a drafting mistake
They aren't going down
Fine referred to as "shared responsibility" payments
Great care at good prices can be found elsewhere
They could monkeywrench the whole thing, we hope
The rise of first-rate hospitals abroad may provide a vital lifeline for Americans.
Big, new costs associated with legalizing 11 million people
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10