CNN Panelist Claims That Donald Trump Caused Charlottesville Attack
The punch line: It was a panel on the dangers of misinformation.
The punch line: It was a panel on the dangers of misinformation.
Regulating AI could threaten free speech, just as earlier proposed regulations of other media once did.
Someone did allegedly threaten first responders, but the panic may have done more damage.
Jane and I discuss calls to restrict misinformation, from the Sedition Act of 1798 to Hurricane Helene.
A new study finds that conservatives are especially likely to share information from sources that a "politically balanced" sample of Republicans and Democrats deemed untrustworthy.
Both presidential candidates (and their running mates) seem confused about the constraints imposed by the First Amendment.
A federal judge ruled that the law was overbroad and violated the First Amendment.
A new study shows it is widespread on several issues, in ways that bolster restrictionism.
Seven congressional Democrats called on the FEC to stop deepfakes. But is there really much to worry about?
The Telegram co-founder may become a free-expression martyr for the terrible crime of enabling permissionless speech.
Plus: RFK Jr. thrown off the N.Y. ballot, Ukraine advances into Russia, and more...
We're entering peak stupidity with "election interference" claims.
Nina Jankowicz finds out the truth may hurt, but it isn’t lawsuit bait.
Washington keeps getting caught pushing the kind of disinformation it claims to oppose.
Where are the fact-checkers?
About 20 years ago, many American bees did die. Then that steadily diminished—but hysteria in the press continued.
Half the country says suppressing “false information” is more important than press freedom.
The American Sunlight Project contends that researchers are being silenced by their critics.
Fight back through better information and discourse, not by empowering the government.
And they're still trying to censor speech on social media.
The Biden administration’s social media meddling went far beyond "information" and "advice."
Several justices seemed concerned that an injunction would interfere with constitutionally permissible contacts.
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
Even as they attack the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation," Missouri and Louisiana defend legal restrictions on content moderation.
Where are the fact-checkers and misinformation cops?
Medical professionals are often unaware of the relevant research on the relative risks of tobacco products, and that can matter for public health.
From limits on liability protections for websites to attempts to regulate the internet like a public utility, these proposals will erode Americans' right to express themselves.
The Biden administration's interference with bookselling harks back to a 1963 Supreme Court case involving literature that Rhode Island deemed dangerous.
Where are the misinformation czars and the mainstream media fact-checkers now?
The doctor's claims that he was open to either explanation is flatly contradicted by his literal words.
Plus: State officials attempt to ban Donald Trump from 2024 election ballots.
Academic malfeasance by Harvard's president deserves media coverage and condemnation, not excuses.
The former journalist defends misinformation in the Trump era and explains why so many journalists are against free speech.
Your support makes some of the "riskiest" journalism on the internet possible.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) introduced a bill last month that would bar federal agencies from forcing employees to respect preferred names or pronouns.
An extensive new study finds that the answer is "no." Belief in conspiracy theories is about equally common on different sides of the political spectrum.
The notion that COVID-19 came from a lab was once touted as misinformation. But now the FBI, the Energy Department, and others agree with Paul.
Democrats and Republicans are united in thinking their political agendas trump the First Amendment.
Aside from narrowly defined exceptions, false speech is protected by the First Amendment.
The justices agreed to consider whether the Biden administration's efforts to suppress online "misinformation" were unconstitutional.
Perhaps the Walter Cronkite Awards ought to have slightly higher standards?
Several federal judges had expressed skepticism about the constitutionality of penalizing physicians for departing from a government-defined "consensus."
Economist Tyler Cowen elaborates on some of the reasons why. The root of the problem is that voters have poor incentives to become well-informed and evaluate information objectively.
The U.S.-Bahraini security pact is the first step towards a future U.S.-Saudi “mega-deal.” Critics say it violates the U.S. Constitution and aids torturers.
Yoel Roth worries about government meddling in content moderation, except when Democrats target "misinformation."
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10