Justice Jackson Shares Her Concerns about Trump Immunity Ruling
In the same week that Jack Smith refiles his Trump Indictment, Justice Jackson talks about the SCOTUS decision that made refiling necessary.
In the same week that Jack Smith refiles his Trump Indictment, Justice Jackson talks about the SCOTUS decision that made refiling necessary.
The Supreme Court is not as “extreme” or divided as it may seem.
Her concurrence is a reminder that the application of criminal law should not be infected by personal animus toward any given defendant.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
If partisans have one thing in common, it's confirmation bias.
Justice Jackson notes her objection to the Court's standard practice of vacating lower court decisions rendered moot by the prevailing party below.
The Supreme Court was wrong to deny relief to a man imprisoned for activity that Court's own rulings indicate was not illegal - one who never had an opportunity to challenge his incarceration on that basis.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
To the junior-most justice goes a case arising out of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction concerning the Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler's Checks Act.
For the second time, Justice Jackson dissents from the Supreme Court's refusal to hear a case.
The Supreme Court’s newest member weighs in on the meaning of Section 230 in Gonzalez v. Google.
It is becoming a pattern for Supreme Court justices to make significant amounts of money by publishing books.
The Supreme Court's oral arguments have become significantly longer, but the Court has yet to issue an opinion on the merits so far this term.
The liberal justice seems ready to fight legal conservatives on their own ground.
Originalist scholar Larry Solum suggests KBJ could be the Left's Antonin Scalia.
In her short, yet searing dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argues that the court should have granted the petition of an Ohio man sentenced to death after prosecutors hid a key witness' severe intellectual disability from jurors.
The Court's newest justice was an extremely active questioner during the Supreme Court's October arguments.
The Court denied the Biden's request for a stay of a lower court injunction against new immigration enforcement guidelines.
The Supreme Court announces when Judge Jackson will become Justice Jackson.
Newly confirmed Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has a good track record on cases involving qualified immunity.
Ketanji Brown Jackson will be the nation's first Supreme Court justice to have served as a public defender, and the first since Thurgood Marshall to have experience as a defense attorney. That's good.
It explains why many of the reasons GOP senators gave for opposing Jackson were ridiculous, but also that there is nothing inherently wrong in opposing a qualified "mainstream" nominee based on differences over judicial philosophy.
The Supreme Court nominee's critics say she clearly did, but several federal appeals courts disagree.
Plus, the Reason editors' thoughts on Ketanji Brown Jackson
Can you define "partisan circus?"
Republicans take a page from the Democrats’ book by crying “dark money” during Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation hearing.
There's a particular richness to Republican senators weaponizing the right to defense counsel as an affront to the Constitution as opposed to something that's pivotal to it.
The mindlessly punitive senator grilled Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson about her resentencing of a drug offender.
While some legal ethics experts suggest recusal would not be necessary, the SCOTUS nominee suggested she thinks otherwise.
Even if the senators are genuinely confused, that underlines the recklessness of their attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson.
“I believe that the Constitution is fixed in its meaning,” said the Supreme Court nominee.
The senator argues that questioning sex offender policies "endangers our children."
As expected, Tuesday's hearing was primarily made up of political theater.
The Supreme Court nominee raised serious constitutional concerns about laws that punish sex offenders after they complete their sentences.
George Will and the Washington Post editorial board suggest some good ones. I add a few of my own.
The process has many flaws. But we're still better off with the hearings than we would be without them.
The Missouri senator's attack on the Supreme Court nominee elides crucial distinctions and ignores widespread judicial criticism of child pornography sentences.
Does her position on Harvard University's Board of Overseers require or counsel her recusal once she is confirmed?
President Biden's Supreme Court nominee was counsel of record for a Cato Institute brief in a case challenging the detention of alleged enemy combatants.
News reports indicate President Biden has made his choice to replace Justice Stephen Breyer
ABCNews unearths an interesting interview with Ketanji Brown Jackson about Justice Clarence Thomas