Opinion: DOJ's New Rules for Investigating the Press Are Small Improvement
Actions are more important than nominal policy
Actions are more important than nominal policy
A huge headache all around
Pissing off the press was a mistake
Sometimes great acts of journalism are the work of average citizens.
Making it harder to practice journalism in an already difficult place
Private public comments a little different
An alternative to the hard-line government scheme
The First Amendment cares not for your arbitrary guidelines
Hostile scrutiny from the government makes it tough
A revokable privilege if you anger the state, we assume
But will the British press be allowed to cover his testimony?
He may have lied about scrutiny of the reporter
Will try to say something less perjury-ish
Who targeted her and her employer? Mr. Holder?
Worst-kept secret, ever
Panetta highly unlikely to face prosecution
Attack called "professional"
Going to trial in Britain
Legislation based on protecting people's feelings could have problematic side effects
He said he didn't know about prosecuting journalists, not spying on them
After revelations that Holder was part of the decision making process involved in naming Fox News' James Rosen a "co-conspirator"
Related to surveillance of reporters
None of them should be attending
When the Obama Administration loses David Axelrod...
Specifically, in a May 17 hearing in response to a question about government surveillance of journalists
Whistleblower Thomas Drake was prosecuted by the Obama DOJ for "mishandling" documents
Six of nine prosecutions of leakers under the Espionage Act happened under Obama's term in office
Trying to win back some friends?
Sent memo to Fox employees
Well, of course they do
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10