Sen. Feinstein Pushes Restrictive "Journalist" Definition Under Shield Law
No First Amendment for you!
No First Amendment for you!
Hope they've said goodbye to their loved ones
Want to control who does and doesn't get protections (Hint: WikiLeaks is on the 'no' list)
Just the latest local snooping kerfuffle
Just what we need: "official" journalists
The courts would rather crush press freedom than let a CIA leaker escape
Source provided classified info for book
Outrage machine is outraged
Actions are more important than nominal policy
A huge headache all around
Pissing off the press was a mistake
Sometimes great acts of journalism are the work of average citizens.
Making it harder to practice journalism in an already difficult place
Private public comments a little different
An alternative to the hard-line government scheme
The First Amendment cares not for your arbitrary guidelines
Hostile scrutiny from the government makes it tough
A revokable privilege if you anger the state, we assume
But will the British press be allowed to cover his testimony?
He may have lied about scrutiny of the reporter
Will try to say something less perjury-ish
Who targeted her and her employer? Mr. Holder?
Worst-kept secret, ever
Panetta highly unlikely to face prosecution
Attack called "professional"
Going to trial in Britain
Legislation based on protecting people's feelings could have problematic side effects
He said he didn't know about prosecuting journalists, not spying on them