These Pro-Lifers Don't Love Abortion Bans
Reason talked with pro-life Americans who are uncomfortable with the post–Roe v. Wade abortion policy landscape.
Reason talked with pro-life Americans who are uncomfortable with the post–Roe v. Wade abortion policy landscape.
Voters should not dismiss the former president's utter disregard for the truth as a personal quirk or standard political practice.
Abortion should have been an easy win for Biden, but his incoherent answer during Thursday's debate allowed Trump to come out on top.
The justice's benign comments set off a lengthy news cycle and have been treated as a scandal by some in the media. Why?
The "most pro-life president in American history" cannot please hardline activists without alienating voters.
A new California law amends the state's ban on out-of-state doctors practicing medicine to allow doctors from Arizona to perform abortions for patients who are also from Arizona.
Why originalist criticisms of Dobbs often misfire, and why criticisms *of* Dobbs's originalism often misfire too.
Plus: A listener asks the editors for examples of tasks the government does well (yikes).
The case hinged on statutory interpretation, not the merits of the state's 1864 ban.
His embrace of federalism is one of those rare instances when political expedience coincides with constitutional principles.
The former and would-be president is keen to avoid alienating voters who reject both kinds of extremism on the issue.
A wave of ballot measures reminds us most Americans are moderate on abortion.
The former president is right to worry that supporting restrictions on abortion could hurt him in the general election.
Despite state-level bans, new data show around 46,000 more abortions were performed during the first six months of 2023 than during the same period in 2020.
A study from researchers at Johns Hopkins is the first to look at the effects of Texas' 2021 "Heartbeat Act" on live births.
Plus: APA says social media not inherently harmful for kids, senators propose Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Agency, and more...
Americans’ opinions are more nuanced than headlines suggest, leaving little room for total bans.
The Supreme Court's Dobbs decision gives states the ability to prohibit abortion. For a lot of pro-lifers, this highlights how much persuading they still have to do.
An underground network in Chicago helped women terminate thousands of pregnancies amid abortion prohibition.
The Supreme Court said in 1942 that local activity, not just interstate activity, was subject to congressional regulation.
Last week, a Kansas judge halted the enforcement of a law requiring a doctor to be in the same room as a patient taking abortion pills—a move hailed by abortion advocates as an important step to increase medication abortion access in the state.
Rethinking the constitutional defense of reproductive rights after Dobbs via the Ninth Amendment
Out-of-state and self-managed abortions pose daunting challenges for pro-life legislators.
The report highlights the power and limits of state bans as well as the difficulty of measuring their impact.
The Constitution's commerce clause guarantees a domestic free trade zone. A state law that bars a resident from traveling to take advantage of another state’s economic activity would be unconstitutional.
We already know what happens when governments try to impose prohibitions: messy, deadly black markets.
Plus: Video game play time doesn't affect well-being, crypto groups applaud the Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act, and more...
The FDA, and the Dalkon Shield scandal, deserve some of the blame.
Plus: Banned books, a bookstore revival, and more...
The Supreme Court may have overturned Roe v. Wade, but it has not ended legal battles over abortion.
Plus: What overturning Roe means for Republicans' future, court halts ban of Juul products, and more...
If life begins at conception, there are virtually no limits on government surveillance of women in a post-Roe world.
The conservative majority's commitments on contraception, sexual intimacy, and same-sex marriage
The Biden Administration is apparently considering a range of responses should te Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade.
With thirty-three opinions in argued cases yet to issue, the Supreme Court is well behind the usual pace.
An assessment of claims that Justice Alito's draft opinion rests on historical error, provides no meaningful basis for distinguishing abortion from other unenumerated rights, and forecloses constitutional protection of the mother's life.
The former Associate Justice joins those condemning the leak of a draft opinion.
A prominent progressive law professor challenges some of the prevailing orthodoxy on Roe, Dobbs, and Supreme Court precedent.
There is much, much less in the leaked draft than meets the eye
Would the outcome in Dobbs put originalism in doubt?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10