What's Really at Stake in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case?
From pretrial detention to the threat of foreign rendition, the Abrego Garcia case shows how political prosecutions and coercive plea deals have eroded the promise of a fair trial.
From pretrial detention to the threat of foreign rendition, the Abrego Garcia case shows how political prosecutions and coercive plea deals have eroded the promise of a fair trial.
“This is protected speech,” said the app’s creator. “We are determined to fight this with everything we have."
Just as it was a scandal when the IRS under Obama allegedly targeted Tea Party groups.
The legal rationales for prosecuting James Comey, Adam Schiff, and Letitia James suggest the president is determined to punish them one way or another.
The administration is pursuing a vendetta, but Comey and the FBI deserve scrutiny and reduced stature.
By demanding that the Justice Department punish the former FBI director for wronging him, the president provided evidence to support a claim of selective or vindictive prosecution.
The FBI director's portrayal of the case exemplifies the emptiness of his promise that there would be "no retributive actions" against the president's enemies.
There is ample evidence to suspect prosecutors are just doing President Trump's dirty work rather than following the facts of the case.
Lawsuits against Oregon and Maine test how far the federal government can go in demanding access to voter information.
Although the officers were eventually criminally convicted, Jarius Brown is still pursuing damages to cover the medical expenses for serious injuries to his face, nose, and chest.
Journalist Michael Tracey discusses problems with what he call the "Epstein mythology" on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
Such a gun ban is not authorized by statute or allowed by the Second Amendment.
The NRA says it won't support "any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process."
Failure of imagination drives the bipartisan energy around busting so-called Big Tech monopolies.
The Justice Department reportedly is considering a regulation aimed at disarming "mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria."
With government agencies turned into partisan weapons, trust is a tribal matter.
A recent federal appeals court decision underlines the importance of that safeguard.
As part of his response to the alleged crime emergencies taking place nationwide, Trump signed an executive order restricting federal funding from jurisdictions with cashless bail policies.
A video by the White House corroborates that account, calling into question just how serious the president is about actually addressing crime.
The latest escalation in the showdown between the Trump administration and D.C. elected officials
The DOJ blocked Spirit's merger with JetBlue in 2024 over concerns about market consolidation, but markets also consolidate when failing firms go bankrupt and exit.
Using the FBI to track down AWOL Texas Democrats is an unnecessary expansion of federal law enforcement authority.
Despite record seizures and restrictive laws, New York City has struggled to stem the tide of untraceable firearms.
The Trump administration's lawsuit against New York City challenges decades of sanctuary policies and local independence.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has placed minor restraints on the government’s ability to impose gag orders on secret subpoenas issued to tech companies.
Plus: Columbia settles, State Department releases murderer, and more...
Two members of the House Judiciary Committee say the case against Michelino Sunseri epitomizes the overcriminalization that the president decries.
The contrast between the two cases illustrates the haphazard impact of an arbitrary, constitutionally dubious gun law.
The alleged incident goes to the heart of the objections raised by critics who worry about Bove's respect for the rule of law.
One immigration judge referred to an ICE attorney as merely “Department” during a hearing.
The market has demonstrated it’s perfectly capable of fostering innovation and competition without government intervention.
Jim Ryan is the latest casualty in Trump's unconstitutional war against elite universities.
Democratic critics of the new program overlook the injustice of permanently disarming Americans who pose no threat to public safety.
Penny McCarthy is suing the federal agents who insisted she was a fugitive despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
With the OneTaste case, the Department of Justice has embraced infantilizing ideas about women, consent, and coercion.
The case against Michelino Sunseri exemplifies the injustice caused by the proliferation of regulatory crimes—the target of a recent presidential order.
The disgraced former Democratic senator was convicted of accepting almost $1 million in bribes in exchange for, among other things, favors benefiting foreign governments.
John Moore and Tanner Mansell were convicted of theft after they freed sharks they erroneously thought had been caught illegally.
Scott Jenkins was convicted of engaging in cartoonish levels of corruption. If the rule of law only applies to the little guy, then it isn't worth much.
There's only one way to eliminate the scalping market: Charge more for tickets.
Trump rightly decries the "absurd and unjust" consequences of proliferating regulatory crimes.
Bondi said the president's drug policy prevented the deaths of 75 percent of Americans, in just his first 100 days.
The Justice Department is pursuing an antitrust policy inspired by Oren Cass and members of the New Right.
Former Rep. Ron Paul argues that slashing red tape will do more to bring down home prices than pressuring the central bank to cut interest rates.
The memo says "Alien Enemies" aren't subject "to a judicial review of the removal in any court of the United States."
Google has lost its second major antitrust case against the Department of Justice, threatening the tech giant's free-to-consumer business model.
Families described not being told their loved one was in the hospital or even when they had died.
The movie star’s special treatment highlights the injustice of an illogical federal law.