Even If the CDC's Mask Mandate Made Sense, That Would Not Make It Legal
The decision against the rule hinged on whether the agency had the power it asserted.
The decision against the rule hinged on whether the agency had the power it asserted.
Though travel isn't completely back to normal, this change is an overdue acknowledgment that we can't always view COVID-19 transmission as catastrophic.
The decision holds that the CDC exceeded its legal authority. But it may be vulnerable to reversal on appeal.
"Our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in pursuit of desirable ends," writes Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle.
If you resent government incompetence and malice, maybe your devalued dollars will buy less of it.
Plus: Elon Musk offers to buy all of Twitter, China's "zero COVID" policy is reaching its limits, and more...
The CDC thinks a monthlong review of COVID policies will be sufficient to redress their errors.
"I know the CDC is working to develop a scientific framework," says Ashish K. Jha
The controversial public health order will finally meet its end after U.S. immigration officials used it to carry out 1.7 million expulsions.
The policy caused immense suffering, in exchange for meager public health benefits, if any at all. Its history undercuts the case for granting broad powers and judicial deference to the CDC.
Ridership is dismally depressed and a federal mask mandate for straphangers remains stubbornly in place.
The lawsuit raises some of the same issues as earlier successful challenges against the CDC's eviction moratorium. But, in this case, the federal government has a stronger legal rationale for its policies.
The eviction moratorium and Title 42 "public health" expulsion cases have many parallels that may have been ignored because of their differing ideological valence. Both strengthen the case for nondeferential judicial review of the exercise of emergency powers.
There are no public health gains from booting kids out of the country.
The same agency that brought us security theater continues to enforce a rule that never made sense.
The court ruled the CDC can continue to use its public health power to expel migrants, but not to countries where they are likely to face persecution or torture.
The agency ignores downward trends in both kinds of nicotine use and obscures the huge difference in the hazards they pose.
The surgeon general's definition of misinformation includes statements that are arguably or verifiably true.
"If I do my job right, you should barely know I'm here."
The COVID-conscious advice from the federal government's primary disaster response agency is silly. It's also outdated.
The agency emphasizes that children face a very low risk from COVID-19, which it has known all along.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky stressed that people could continue to wear masks if they wanted to.
From the CDC to the FDA, there are too many missteps to list.
Walensky acknowledged "limitations" of available studies but told a congressional committee "our guidance currently is that masking should happen in all schools."
Seven out of 10 Americans say "it's time we accept COVID is here to stay and we just need to get on with our lives." Politicians are taking notice.
The president is waiting until children, who have always faced an infinitesimal risk from COVID-19, are "more protected."
The proposed guidelines emphasize the need for individualized treatment and collaboration with patients.
Rochelle Walensky says "now is not the moment" to stop forcing masks on children. Democratic politicians increasingly disagree.
The agency further undermines its credibility by desperately trying to back up conclusions it has already reached.
That recommendation, which never had a firm basis, is even harder to justify in the current context.
Supporters of that policy assume it works, then desperately search for evidence to validate that conviction.
Unvaccinated Americans over age 50 are 44 times more likely to be hospitalized than triple-vaccinated folks.
Why did it take so long?
The question for the Supreme Court was not whether the policy was wise but whether it was legal.
Defenders of the CDC eviction moratorium predicted a "tsunami" of evictions would happen if the policy were rescinded. That hasn't happened.
Plus: Noncitizens can vote in New York City, making baseball fair, and more...
The CDC director's explanation of her agency's confusing advice about home COVID-19 testing is hard to understand.
Plus, the CDC's amateur psychoanalyzing.
A new study of 915 childhood COVID-19 hospitalizations found that most involved underlying conditions.
Plus: Conspiracy theory research, student loan forgiveness, and more...
Farewell to a Biden White House messaging strategy that was terrible long before Omicron
Rochelle Walensky willfully ignores the weaknesses of a study she repeatedly cited to justify "universal masking" of students.
Plus: Criminals have stolen $100 billion in pandemic relief funds, and colleges are planning to go virtual once again.
Plus: Julian Assange faces extradition, the GOP is paying Donald Trump's legal expenses, and more...
While the press and politicians try to make the virus a political morality play, Reason keeps its head even while screaming at anti-scientific restrictionism.
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today