Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Social Media

Taylor Lorenz: Is Social Media Responsible for Bad Parenting?

Tech journalist Taylor Lorenz discusses the Meta trial, the moral panic around social media, and the risks of regulating online speech.

Nick Gillespie | 3.27.2026 11:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/d2h6a3ly6ooodw.cloudfront.net/reasontv_audio_8375432.mp3
:15 :15
Download

Taylor Lorenz: Is Social Media Responsible for Bad Parenting?

HD Video Download

In a precedent-setting verdict this week, a Los Angeles jury held Meta and YouTube responsible for addicting a young woman to their services and exacerbating her mental health struggles. The jury recommended the two companies pay $6 million to the plaintiff, now 20, identified in court documents as Kaley or KMG. The verdict came a day after a New Mexico jury found that Meta harmed the mental health of children, failed to protect them from sexual predators, and violated state law.

In this special bonus episode of The Reason Interview, Nick Gillespie talks with tech journalist Taylor Lorenz, founder of User Mag, who covered the Los Angeles trial. She recounts testimony from Kaley's deposition describing physical and psychological abuse from her parents. Lorenz argues that Kaley's unstable home life was a more significant factor in her mental health issues than social media use. Kaley even used Instagram to complain about her mother, who at one point would communicate with her daughter only through the app.

Lorenz and Gillespie discuss rising cultural and political calls for regulation of social media, pending legislation such as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), and how Meta and other major players are simultaneously defending themselves in court while pursuing regulation that may benefit them at the expense of free speech.

Previous appearance:
"Taylor Lorenz Makes Sense of Online Culture for the Rest of Us," February 26, 2020

 

0:00—Observations from the trial

1:56—The plaintiff's mental health and history of abuse

6:34—Mark Zuckerberg's testimony

7:04—Is social media becoming the cultural scapegoat?

10:19—The impact of this verdict on setting legal precedents

13:15—KOSA

14:47—How sexual content drives regulation efforts

16:33—Are companies liable for not enforcing age verification?

17:56—What are the privacy threats with age verification?

19:05—Why more regulation stifles competition

21:48—Do younger generations value free speech?

 

Reason is hiring! Check out the two open roles on the video team now:
https://reason.org/jobs/associate-producer/
https://reason.org/jobs/producer/

NEXT: Dysfunction, Communists in Cuba, and Pointless Streetcars

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Social MediaMark ZuckerbergLawsuitsParentingLiabilityChildrenFacebookGoogleFree SpeechCourtsInternetRegulation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (66)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

    Why Nick, why?

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      FFS, Taylor? Libertarianism has become a really, really sad joke.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Horatio Cornblower   2 months ago

        I think Trump broke their brains.

        Log in to Reply
      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Cocktail party libertarianism. Explains their left leaning views, lack of consistency, sources, and friends.

        Log in to Reply
  2. Rick James   2 months ago

    Now we're just being fucking trolled.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

      The Psyop Will Continue Until...

      Log in to Reply
  3. Rick James   2 months ago

    When your magazine goes from regularly hosting people like Brendan O'Neill to becoming a place where Taylor Lorenz's opinions on anything are taken seriously tells you everything you need to know.

    Log in to Reply
    1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      This

      Log in to Reply
  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    OMG

    Log in to Reply
    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      So hot, right?

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Eww.

        Log in to Reply
  5. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Some chick with mental illness shouldn’t be able to upend an entire industry.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      She comes from an entire political party of mentally ill people. Most of whom are retarded.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Rick James   2 months ago

    This is how fucking retarded this vapid bitch is.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    There are no words.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

    Tech journalist Taylor Lorenz

    Why isn't journalist is scare quotes?

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Personally, I'd put "Tech" before "journalist" but agree that both should go in quotes.

      She wasn't educated in tech. Never worked in tech. Doesn't own or manage any companies in tech beyond her political science journalism/activism. Her involvement with technology is as strong as Barack Obama's involvement with Trayvon Martin.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Hey now. She has connections. Her dad can remove her dumb shit in the wayback machine.

        Log in to Reply
  9. Jim Conley   2 months ago

    That's libertarian tech journalist Taylor Lorenz, Nick. Remember she converted when Robbie and Liz took her to Cato's big 50th birthday bash.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Rick James   2 months ago

    Taylor Crying.

    Log in to Reply
  11. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

    JFC Nck, read the damned room.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      As I said...Gillespie is light years out of touch. That he would not once, not twice, but repeatedly turn to a vapid influencer cum-journalist who's best known for attacking and demanding censorship of everyone and everything she didn't like, and then publicly crying about it when called out on it tells you everything you need to know about Gillespie.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        I thought she was best known for being a 45 year old cosplaying as an immunity deficient 30 year old.

        Log in to Reply
      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Yes, “cum journalist” sounds about right in her case.

        Log in to Reply
  12. Rick James   2 months ago

    Taylor Lorenz: Is Social Media Responsible for Bad Parenting?

    Wait... serious question... isn't she a childless cat lady?

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Actual answer: Yes.

      Right-wing answer: Yes.

      Edgy, speculative, conspiratorial, right-wing, patriarchal answer: If she's not a childless cat lady, the censorship campaign she's perpetrating against her own spouse and/or children is insane.

      Log in to Reply
  13. Agammamon   2 months ago

    Why TF are we talking about some insane Millenial's takes on anything? Why is this nasty woman being taken seriously? She lies about people and then whines when the blowback comes.

    She still thinks the COVID pandemic is still happening.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Well, Reason did frequently publish a lot of ‘what do millennials think’ articles some years ago. To Nick, Lorenz must be the hippest millennial of them all.

      Log in to Reply
  14. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

    I’m heartened by the deserved dragging FonIe is getting here.

    Taylor Lorenz is a terrible journalist and an even worse person with nothing to share on the topic of parenting or responsible online behavior.

    I’d rather hear from someone more intellectually honest, like maybe Alex Jones or Karrine Jean Pierre, than anything from her

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      And maybe someone who isn’t an authoritarian Marxist.

      Log in to Reply
  15. Truthteller1   2 months ago

    You have to be fucking kidding me.

    Log in to Reply
  16. Truthteller1   2 months ago

    If she is a tech journalist, or any journalist, then Sullum is rational, objective human.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      No, the problem is that she's an idiot. All it takes to be a journalist is to find a journal willing to publish your nonsense. Being a journalist doesn't imply you are any good at it.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        All it takes to be a journalist is to find a journal willing to publish your nonsense.

        Mission accomplished!

        Log in to Reply
      2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        I think that’s on the masthead here

        Log in to Reply
  17. hokey   2 months ago

    The model of what happens when you are online too much. Sure, that ruling was dumb and parents need to be involved (as hard as it is getting), but it is a serious lack of strategy and tact to prop up this person as an argument against that ruling. Nick you have hurt this case, not helped it. I don't know if it's by design or not and it breaks my heart now that I'm wondering that.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Minadin   2 months ago

    Why are we platforming this reprehensible bitch?

    Log in to Reply
  19. MK Ultra   2 months ago

    Really? This fucking broken Covid clown? Will Scary Poppins be in next week for a discussion on censorship?

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Get both of the, together, and force them to fight to the death in a Thunderdome that is an exact copy of the one from Mad Max 3.

      With real weapons.

      Log in to Reply
  20. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    When I saw Taylor Lorenz in the title, I knew immediately what the reaction would be, and I was not disappointed.

    More outrage over platforming Taylor Lorenz than about the softball interviews that right-wing media gave to Fuentes. Or about most of the garbage that constitutes right-wing media generally.

    "Look how far Reason/Gillespie has fallen!" This is of course the same Gillespie who interviewed Rand Paul, Chip Roy, John McWhorter, Jay Bhattacharya, and others in good standing on the right. Gillespie is not the problem. Your insane reaction to Gillespie is the problem.

    FFS Gillespie interviewed a clown-show WWE performer who became a mayor in Tennessee. Not a single one of you said "wtf are you doing interviewing this moron?" Gee I wonde(R) why.

    I think what pisses you off the most, is that he brings voices to Reason that are outside the right-wing bubble. Can't have anyone who disagrees with the narrative! You'd rather have another stupid story peddling manufactured outrage over some trans person. Because that kind of story gives you the dopamine hit you're looking for.

    Sure Taylor Lorenz is an idiot, but she's no worse than RFK Jr. And she has way less power than him. Frankly I'm happy that Gillespie interviewed her, if it gets all of you worked up. That's what gives me a dopamine hit.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Fatfuck, she is orders of magnitude “worse them RRK Jr.”. It’s just that you’re an extreme far left global Marxist Sorosite propagandist.

      Do you really believe her ‘diverse voice’ adds anything to a discussion? She’s just as dishonest as you, and even dumber. So the likely event is that she helps Nick advance leftist narratives as required by Koch and others in exchange for their far left blood money.

      Just like you.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Rick James   2 months ago

      More outrage over platforming Taylor Lorenz than about the softball interviews that right-wing media gave to Fuentes.

      Would that be the *checks previous Reason article* anti-interventionist, anti-Israel bloc?

      Log in to Reply
    3. Rick James   2 months ago

      More outrage over platforming Taylor Lorenz than about the softball interviews that right-wing media gave to Fuentes.

      Nick Fuentes is a retard-- I'd say on par with Lorenz, and at this point, if Gillespie brought Fuentes in as a regular contributor, then that would actually fit with where this magazine is going has gone.

      Log in to Reply
      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Why yes, Nick Fuentes is a retard. And when Tucker Carlson gave him a platform with a softball interview, and then the Heritage Foundation defended Tucker, what was the reaction around here? Was it comment after comment saying "why did you give that retard a platform?" No, no it wasn't. It was a little more nuanced than that. Hmm. I wonde(R) why.

        The fact that you cite someone named "Rageaholic" approvingly just makes my point. That's what you want - people who yell and rave and get you all worked up with manufactured outrages du jour. This week it's the OUTRAGE of a trans person using the 'wrong' bathroom. Next week it will be the OUTRAGE of "Sharia law". Then it will be the OUTRAGE of illegals behaving badly. Then it will be the OUTRAGE of some Democrat saying something nutty. That's what you've come to expect from your media consumption. That is how they use you and manipulate you, by getting you addicted to these dopamine fixes triggered by OUTRAGE. Stop being a tool and start thinking for yourself.

        Log in to Reply
        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Tucker is not a conservative. At least not anymore. And most people outside of Pakistani Islamists and you leftists have disavowed him.

          And yes, all the things you Marxists do tends to be outrageous, malignantly and retardedly so.

          You just don’t like how patriotic Americans push back against your kind.

          Log in to Reply
        2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

          THIS ISNT THE TUCKER CARLSON SHOW, YOU STUPID FVCKIN MORON. GO THERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT NICK FUENTES

          I havent seen anything dumber or more dishonest than equating Taylor Lorenz with Rand Paul or Jay Battychara. At least not until the next dumb dishonest thing you post, you continually plumb new lows seeking your ever-elusive “gotcha”

          It’s not the fact that Taylor Lorenz isn’t right wing, it’s that she is, if not the worst, then in the top 5 worst of all mainstream media members. Stupidity only exceeded by self-righteousness and hypocrisy.

          No one complains when any honest lefties are “platformed”, the problem being that being honest on the left nowadays gets you labeled as right-wing.
          (See: Maher, Taibbi, Shellenberger, Greenwald, Rogan, Haidt, Weinsteins, etc)

          Log in to Reply
      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Two movies, one screen:
        Gray Box: The commenters weren't harsh enough on Nick Fuentes.
        Commenters: It's sad how apt "Nick Fuentes is to Tucker Carlson as Taylor Lorenz is to Nick Gillespie" has become.

        Log in to Reply
        1. mad.casual   2 months ago

          And this comes with the usual note about context or pretext: If you're keeping tabs to the point that you know who is cheer leading Nick F., Tucker Carlson, or both here, there, and everywhere in between; then Nick F., Tucker Carlson, and all the supporters everywhere in between takes up a lot more of your cognitive sphere than it does mine.

          For all I know, Nick F. died a month ago. Thanks to Nick G. however, I know Taylor Lorenz is alive and has been working her political schtick within the last week.

          Log in to Reply
          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Someone really should drive a wooden stake through her heart while she retardedly slumbers in her coffin by day.

            Log in to Reply
            1. MK Ultra   2 months ago

              I'm currently watching the movie "Renfield," which made the comment even more amusing. I would contend, however, that she is more likely to be a lizard person than a bootleg lady Dracula.

              Log in to Reply
    4. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      Glen Jacobs is a good mayor, libertarianish, and a lot smarter than you

      Log in to Reply
    5. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      I’ve never seen anyone ever say anything positive about Fuentes here, but then again I didn’t even know who he was until five minutes ago and I care about him the same amount now as I did before I’d heard of him, Lying Jeffy.

      But I do know who Taylor Lorenz is because your team almost put her in a position to censor people. Which explains why you’re deflecting people attacking her.

      Log in to Reply
    6. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      If Gillespie were to interview Fuentes, I would expect it to be at least somewhat hostile and not accepting of Fuentes premises. Lorentz, on the other hand, seems to be interviewed as some kind of friendly expert and is quoted as such recently by ENB. This is what the objection to her is.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Minadin   2 months ago

        If Nick were to interview Fuentes, I'm make the same comment about platforming a vile bitch.

        Log in to Reply
        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Haha, that’s a good description for both of them!

          Poor Lying Jeffy, this just didn’t work out like he hoped it would.

          Log in to Reply
  21. James K. Polk   2 months ago

    Taylor Lorenz has a sewer for a brain. She's been the lead online cheerleader and ball-gargler for murderer Luigi Mangione.

    I guess with Charles Manson now dead, media clowns have to find some other infamous, irredeemable scumbag and pretend they have profound insights.

    Log in to Reply
    1. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

      They need look no farther than God's Own Party sockpuppet shills.

      Log in to Reply
  22. shadydave   2 months ago

    Is there like a special club where you get to continue being in the public eye despite repeatedly humiliating yourself over and over again? How has Taylor Lorenz not gone away yet?

    Log in to Reply
  23. Clipton   2 months ago

    Every time Taylor Lorenz speaks she detracts from the sum of all human knowledge.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Flaco   2 months ago

    Just look at that picture. She's Raw-Dogging the Air!

    Log in to Reply
  25. Flaco   2 months ago

    55 comments so far, and every one is related to the horrible choice of guest. Not one comment about the lawsuit against the tech companies. Probably because no one wants to listen to her.

    Nick, find better guests!

    Log in to Reply
    1. Clipton   2 months ago

      That's what happens when you give media space to A Complete Fucking Idiot, the important underlying message is lost. Glenn Greenwald did the same thing last year when he interviewed her on his Rumble account and within minutes he began shedding subscribers, including me. I don't think he's ever recovered because recently he's revived his Substack work and invited me (and I'm sure the thousands of other former subscribers) to rejoin. Fuck him. Once you betray your readers that trust is never regained.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JeremyR   2 months ago

        Glenn Greenwald is a literal communist who lives in Brazil and hates Western culture. He's so far left that horse shoe theory has made him popular on the far right.

        Log in to Reply
  26. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    It is impossible for watching a screen to harm anyone, including children. It is impossible for children to watch a screen without some adult allowing it. It is impossible to define emotional harm without resorting to voodoo, unscientific, imaginary, magical, non-factual, totally fabricated allegations - usually alleged by some professional having been granted a made-up degree and organizational credentials from a crackpot fantasy institution.

    Log in to Reply
  27. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    Is bad parenting addictive?

    Log in to Reply
  28. JeremyR   2 months ago

    I have a co-worker who honestly believes that vampires are real and many live in a nearby town. She also thinks the company wants to steal her DNA so it can clone her.

    She is less insane and nonsensical than Ms. Lorenz. At least she can go out and live life. Okay, maybe she carries a clove of garlic with her, but it's not as nonsensical as constantly masking.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Listen & Subscribe

Podcast:
The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie

  • Apple Podcasts
  • Spotify
  • YouTube
  • RSS

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks