"I refer to an article that appeared on September 30, 1991, in The Legal Times, which purported to report in some detail on the contents of preliminary drafts of the majority and dissenting opinions."
"Yet I have little doubt as to the inherent power of the Court to protect the confidentiality of its internal operations by whatever judicial measures may be required."
The penultimate paragraph of Part IV provides the course of action going forward.
Once again, the "fatal conceit" of the long game becomes clear.
Speculating on how the apparent Dobbs first draft from Feb. 10, 2022 was leaked.
My instant reaction to Leakgate.
The purported majority opinion by Justice Alito is 98-pages long.
Justice Gorsuch's Shurtleff concurrence places yet another nail in Lemon's crypt.
"And like any factorized analysis, this approach cannot provide a principled way of deciding cases."
"Built in the late 1960s, Boston City Hall is a raw concrete structure, an example of the brutalist style."
"The President Has Three Bodies and There Is No Cause of Action for Ultra Vires Conduct"
Six decades ago, a young Stephen Breyer clerked for Justice Goldberg on a very, very different Supreme Court.
In Houston, about 5% of passengers wore masks. In DCA, about 20% are wearing masks.
A study of the Second Amendment during the pandemic cases.
I'm having flashbacks to NFIB and Bostock. Has there been a leak?
Will the Supreme Court finally overrule the Lemon test?
The flight attendant said, "No more masks!"
The CDC mask mandate was vacated without a stay. Can flight attendants still threaten people with enforcement of civil fines?
Uber is no longer a viable product for me.
In the New York Times v. U.S., the parties filed briefs under severe constraints.
"Turned loose with lawsuits for damages and injunctions against their teachers as they are here, it is nothing but wishful thinking to imagine that young, immature students will not soon believe it is their right to control the schools."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks