Could a Judicial Council take away all of a judge's cases based on the merits of a decision? Could Congress delegate this power of stealth impeachment?
Trump Firing Lisa Cook, Jack Smith Indicting Donald Trump.
Paul Clement used a very fitting image to describe President Taft's hefty approach to due process.
Justice Jackson doubts whether Trump's social media post could have put Lisa Cook on notice that she would be removed.
Can the Court base its ruling in Cook on predictions of a recession?
The Chief Justice, of all people, compares carrying firearms on private property to a pamphleteer knocking on a door.
After a successful audition, they can stop auditioning.
Neal Katyal and Justice Jackson were placed in the uncomfortable spot of having to explain why racist legislation to disarm the freedman was actually relevant.
The Second Amendment does not have a geography clause.
Justice Jackson would instead let "Court staff . . . sort out" meritless petitions.
Once again, Trump manages to make obscure law great again.
The Tariffs case is still cooking, but the Court is clearing the brush.
The majority and dissent’s understanding of standing turned on their visions of democracy. The concurrence does not fare much better.
The details are unclear, but Trump seems to be setting up an institution that could supplant the United Nations Security Council.
Justice Barrett did not write Barrett v. United States, but other Justices wrote the majority opinion who shared a name with a party.
There is nothing originalist about Footnote Four, animus, and suspect classes. Let it go already.
Justice Gorsuch suggested that the West Virginia did not raise the clear statement rule, Justice Sotomayor countered that a substantive canon cannot be waived.
Hecox will not graduate in May, but such mootness could have arisen in King v. Burwell.
"I can roll with policy changes, but what I can't roll with is a tolerance or an overlooking of antisemitism or any form of bigotry."
I have. Conservative litigants are vilified. Liberal litigants are celebrated.
Justice Kagan ponders at great length about whether there can be an as-applied challenge based on the Equal Protection Clause.
They were not as combative as I would have expected, and maybe even not 6-3.
Justice Barrett is thinking about Chief Judge Pryor's holding that Mark Meadows could not remove the Georgia criminal prosecution to federal court.
The deadline is January 30.
80% of members at the American Historical Association conference supported a resolution about "the U.S.-sponsored genocide perpetrated by Israel in Gaza."
The exodus from Heritage continues.
The truth may be that the judges actually believe what they are writing. For the left, that truth is too hard to process, so they rely on the "auditioning" charge.
"The effect, if not purpose, of modern international law is to obstruct American conservative foreign policy."
"The leaders of the conservative think tank have abandoned its founding principles."
Under the clear statement rule, it likely will not.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks