a new article of mine, is now available at the Journal of Law & Religion.
An interesting case, decided under an Ohio statute.
"Cut your backwards ass bullshit or you will start losing family members and the President of the United States will wind up dead!"
Looks like the main problem wasn't the blind reliance, but the coverup.
[UPDATE: Added a brief discussion of pseudonymity and class actions.]
The case arose following plaintiff's arrest, allegedly for telling Justice Kavanaugh's wife that "he might ruin [Justice] Kavanaugh's career and reputation"; but the charges against him were dropped, and he challenged the statute on its face, rather than as applied to his speech.
An interesting opinion from Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett; it arose in a case challenging a Florida law that was aimed at drag shows, but it deals with the remedies question and not the underlying substantive First Amendment question.
"During the custody battle [in Saudi Arabia], Ghassan AlHaidari accused Bethany of gender mixing, adultery, and insulting Islam and Saudi Arabia. Gender mixing, a punishable crime, entails having a male friend. To prove the charge of adultery, Ghassan submitted a photograph of Bethany with a male, who Ghassan claimed to be her boyfriend. The crimes of adultery, insulting Islam, and insulting Saudi Arabia carry a death penalty in Saudi Arabia."
because the investigations doesn't offer the sort of due process available in a judicial trial.
concludes a magistrate judge in recommendations to a federal district court.
concludes a magistrate judge in recommendations to a federal district court.
An allegedly psychic "Internet sleuth" alleged a professor was involved in the University of Idaho student murders; the professor sued; then the "sleuth" countersued.
not just false reports directly to the police.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
