SCOTUS Tackles Illegal File Sharing, Internet Music Piracy, and Copyright Law
Plus: It’s webathon time.
Plus: It’s webathon time.
The Supreme Court’s power to nullify legislative and executive acts is inherent in the Constitution.
Plus: Jimmy Cliff, RIP.
Plus: Ken Burns’ The American Revolution is worth your time.
Remembering the legacy of a principled legal activist.
The right to keep and bear arms occupies a curious place in American legal history.
For the justices, the question is just how much deference the president deserves.
The legal challengers to Trump's tariffs had a good day in court.
Learning Resources v. Trump will test both executive power and judicial fidelity.
Remembering a monstrous era of American history
Long-ago debates about executive authority are not as distant as they might initially seem.
Will the Supreme Court grant Trump the overwhelming judicial deference he demands?
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about the "emergency aid exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
Multiple judges say SCOTUS is going out of its way to grant emergency relief to the president without even bothering to explain why.
Limits on government power are a venerable and beneficial feature of our system.
In a new Supreme Court term packed with big cases, these disputes stand out.
Which version of the chief justice will emerge in the Supreme Court’s newest term?
Plus: Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a book.
The Supreme Court will soon review the president’s authority to fire “independent” agency heads.
The president’s attempt to evade the major questions doctrine deserves to be rejected.
Plus: Pam Bondi flunks free speech 101.
The Supreme Court justice’s new book fails to practice the historical fidelity it preaches.
The justice’s stance on immigration enforcement is undermined by the facts of the case before him.
The Supreme Court will hear Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety this fall.
Plus: A momentous date in the life of Frederick Douglass
Or will the justices say that Trump fired her for illegal reasons?
Plus: An impressive book by a Supreme Court justice.
Asking SCOTUS to hear a case is not the same thing as convincing SCOTUS to hear a case.
SCOTUS will soon decide.
Did they have a point?
The federal government has embraced unconstitutional tactics and now wants SCOTUS to do the same.
The Commerce Clause protects free trade between the states.
A federal court says U.S. citizens “are likely to succeed in showing” that immigration agents violated their rights.
Plus: Ozzy Osbourne, RIP.
Plus: Did Mario Vargas Llosa write the world’s greatest political novel?
Censorship tends to blow up in the faces of the censors.
Plus: A fond farewell to Black Sabbath.
The Constitution requires the president to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
When Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick is worried about our constitutional order, we should all pay heed.
Plus: What songs are on your Independence Day playlist?
Plus: Conservatives won big overall this year at the Supreme Court.
The liberal justice faults the majority for leaving deportees to “suffer violence in far-flung locales.”
Plus: A criminal justice case that managed to unite Alito and Gorsuch.
Plus: The Supreme Court upholds a state ban on transgender care for minors.
Plus: The Texas Chain Saw Massacre on wax.
Plus: When Stalin Meets Star Wars.
Plus: The glorious return of drive-in movie season.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks