Mike Johnson Wants To Spare ICE the Hassle of Getting the Right Warrant Before Forcibly Entering a Home
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
Why a conservative judge’s “patience is at an end” over Trump’s immigration crackdown.
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
How J.D. Vance misstated the law.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
Remembering an important voice from the founding era.
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original meaning.
The Supreme Court should take a page from its own history.
Plus: It's the final day of Reason's webathon.
Plus: It’s webathon time.
The Supreme Court’s power to nullify legislative and executive acts is inherent in the Constitution.
Plus: Jimmy Cliff, RIP.
Plus: Ken Burns’ The American Revolution is worth your time.
Remembering the legacy of a principled legal activist.
The right to keep and bear arms occupies a curious place in American legal history.
For the justices, the question is just how much deference the president deserves.
The legal challengers to Trump's tariffs had a good day in court.
Learning Resources v. Trump will test both executive power and judicial fidelity.
Remembering a monstrous era of American history
Long-ago debates about executive authority are not as distant as they might initially seem.
Will the Supreme Court grant Trump the overwhelming judicial deference he demands?
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about the "emergency aid exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
Multiple judges say SCOTUS is going out of its way to grant emergency relief to the president without even bothering to explain why.
Limits on government power are a venerable and beneficial feature of our system.
In a new Supreme Court term packed with big cases, these disputes stand out.
Which version of the chief justice will emerge in the Supreme Court’s newest term?
Plus: Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a book.
The Supreme Court will soon review the president’s authority to fire “independent” agency heads.
The president’s attempt to evade the major questions doctrine deserves to be rejected.
Plus: Pam Bondi flunks free speech 101.
The Supreme Court justice’s new book fails to practice the historical fidelity it preaches.
The justice’s stance on immigration enforcement is undermined by the facts of the case before him.
The Supreme Court will hear Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety this fall.
Plus: A momentous date in the life of Frederick Douglass
Or will the justices say that Trump fired her for illegal reasons?
Plus: An impressive book by a Supreme Court justice.
Asking SCOTUS to hear a case is not the same thing as convincing SCOTUS to hear a case.
SCOTUS will soon decide.
Did they have a point?
The federal government has embraced unconstitutional tactics and now wants SCOTUS to do the same.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks