My New The Hill Article on How Trump and Harris Cater to Political Ignorance
Both propose awful economic policies that appeal to public ignorance.
Both propose awful economic policies that appeal to public ignorance.
Harvard economist Edward Glaeser, a leading expert on housing policy, offers some ideas on how Congress can use conditional spending to break down barriers to housing construction.
Plus: The feds come for RealPage, a YIMBY caucus comes to Congress, and tiny Rhode Island enacts a big slate of housing reforms.
There would seem to be little added fairness, and little added incentive for illegal immigration, in letting more people draw from a well that's already run dry.
Economist and author Kyla Scanlon discusses inflation, economic narratives, and the housing market.
Kamala Harris' promise to end the housing shortage and adopt rent control shows that YIMBY ideas are just one of several competing housing policy agendas within the Democratic Party.
Economist Tyler Cowen argues the answer is "yes." But much depends on what kind of mobility we're talking about.
Walz is wrong to attack Vance for leaving home to go to Yale. Vance is wrong to support policies that would close off similar opportunities to others.
Americans need a politician dedicated to unwinding decades of government interventions that have driven up the cost of middle-class living.
Plus: An appeals court sides with property owners seeking compensation for the CDC's eviction ban, a Michigan court backs the would-be builders of a "green cemetery," and Kamala Harris' spotty supply-side credentials.
With minor exceptions, their proposals are likely to do more harm than good.
Plus: Taylor Lorenz scandal, Chinese economy in trouble, tax-free tips, and more...
Desperate to control soaring rents, the city council bans rental data tools while ignoring its own role in the housing crisis.
The Minnesota governor is being hailed as a YIMBY zoning reformer despite doing nothing of consequence on the issue.
Would a YIMBY building boom rejuvenate urban family life or produce sterile, megacity hellscapes?
The report has useful data on the scope of the problem, and recommendations on what can be done about it.
If you want "local control" of land use, the best way to do it is let property owners decide how to use their property for themselves.
Plus: Kamala Harris doubles down on rent control, Gavin Newsom issues a new executive order on housing, and the natural tendency to keep adding more regulation.
It's good to hear a candidate actually talk about our spending problem. But his campaign promises would exacerbate it.
The company needs a lot of government permission slips to build its planned new city in the Bay Area. It's now changing the order in which it asks for them.
With prices skyrocketing, the city is weighing whether to regulate hotels further by barring them from hiring contracted workers.
Plus: Gainesville shrinks minimum lot sizes, a Colorado church can keep providing shelter to the homeless, and Berkeley considers allowing small apartments everywhere.
Many states have enacted laws curbing exclusionary zoning and other regulations that block new housing construction.
Vineyard owners face $120,000 in fines for letting an employee and his family live on their 60-acre property without a permit.
There seems to be general bipartisan agreement on keeping a majority of the cuts, which are set to expire. They can be financed by cleaning out the tax code of unfair breaks.
Whoever is president has very weak incentives to get zoning reform right.
It combines nationwide rent control with modest supply-side measures potentially freeing up "underutilized" federal property for housing construction.
Republicans and Democrats have both managed to get worse on housing policy in the past week.
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
How do the two major party candidates stack up on housing policy?
Those three presidential candidates are making promises that would have bewildered and horrified the Founding Fathers.
Plus: A disappointing first round of "Baby YIMBY" grant awards, President Joe Biden endorses rent control, and House Republicans propose cutting housing spending.
Notre Dame law Prof. Patrick Reidy argues that religious organizations are entitled to faith-based exemptions from zoning restrictions preventing them from building affordable housing on their land.
Homeless advocates say the court's decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson gives local governments a blank check to "to arrest or fine those with no choice but to sleep outdoors."
The media, state attorneys general, and the Biden administration are blaming rent-recommendation software for rising rents. Normal stories of supply and demand are the more reasonable explanation.
The city's Rent Guidelines Board approved a nominal 2.75 rent increase for one million rent-stabilized apartments. That's below the year's 3.3 percent inflation rate.
There is a growing movement to let churches and other religious organizations build housing on their property that would otherwise be banned by zoning regulations.
Plus: unpermitted ADUs in San Jose, Sen. J.D. Vance's mass deportation plan for housing affordability, and the California Coastal Commission's anti-housing record.
There may not be a perfect solution to ending homelessness, but there are some clear principles to reduce the friction for those working to do so.
It is coauthored with Josh Braver.
Plus: Sen. John Fetterman introduces a new zoning reform bill, U.C. Berkeley finally beats the NIMBYs in court, and Austin's unwise "equity overlay."
Recent studies diverge on the extent to which public opinion backs policies that would deregulate housing construction. YIMBYs would do well to learn from both.
A guest post on economist Bryan Caplan's Bet On It substack.
Plus: An interview with Colorado Gov. Jared Polis about the state's blockbuster year for housing reform.
Moving is no longer a viable way to grow your wealth in the U.S., says the author of Build, Baby, Build.
Plus: The results of rent control are in, California's tiny home program gets minimal results, and yet another city eyes a crackdown on short-term rentals.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10