The Details of OSHA's Vaccination Rule for Private Employees Suggest Several Ways It Could Be Vulnerable to Legal Challenges
Federal courts will have to decide whether the rule is "necessary" to protect workers from a "grave danger."
Federal courts will have to decide whether the rule is "necessary" to protect workers from a "grave danger."
"Outside activities that may pose a conflict of interest to the executive branch of the State of Florida create a conflict for the University of Florida," said the university in a statement.
The federal standard contains some carve outs that were not part of the White House announcement, likely to help insulate rule from legal challenge. (Updated with a response to Ilya Somin.)
A majority of the Court voiced skepticism about the state’s conceal-carry licensing scheme.
The Pennsbury School Board is not only chilling speech, but also editing out community members’ critiques of the school board from YouTube videos of their meetings.
We can't afford to keep funding defense contractors' cost overruns.
Removing the cap on the state and local tax deduction would be a massive tax break for wealthy Americans who choose to live in high-tax states.
"I'm open to supporting a final bill that helps move our country forward, but I'm equally open to voting against a bill that hurts our country," Manchin says.
The justice grilled a Texas official over the implications of his state’s abortion law.
Careful, thoughtful policy making is not ruling the day.
A surprising grant of certiorari places a high-stakes regulatory case on the Court's docket, with profound implications for EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases.
When overly broad patents and the TSA clash, there are no heroes.
If the power to his house went out during a storm, one assumes Hawley would declare electricity to be a mistake and demand that homes be lit with candles.
Plus: Facebook rebrands, McDonald's hikes menu prices, and more...
Plus: Six Flags arbitrage, Tom Cotton misleads about qualified immunity, and more...
Yesterday's decision eviscerated the Food and Drug Administration for its arbitrary and capricious handling of vaping product applications
Is a required content warning or algorithm change a violation of the First Amendment?
Nuisance claims may not be a particularly effective way to address the problem of climate change, but federal law does not preempt state common law nuisance claims seeking compensatory damages.
Plus: RIP to political humorist Mort Sahl, a look at which households pay the largest share of sin taxes, and more....
"The plaintiffs failed to make out a plausible claim that the Pulse massacre was an act of 'international terrorism' as that term is defined in the ATA."
Once Upon a Time in Shaolin, formerly owned by Martin Shkreli, was auctioned off by the government and bought by the blockchain/art enthusiasts at PleasrDAO.
The justices will hear United States v. Texas and Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson on November 1.
Legislating with budget gimmicks is shameful, timid, risky, and opportunistic. Mostly, though, it's really expensive.
The Texas law “could just as easily be used by other States to restrict First or Second Amendment rights,” the Firearms Policy Coalition tells SCOTUS.
The Second Amendment right is vibrant and prominent for many citizens. The Seventh Amendment right has shriveled to a husk of its former self.
But at least state lawmakers also passed some useful criminal justice bills and policing reforms.
Amazon promotes products that mimic its competition? Welcome to more than a century of American retail practices.
Recognizing the difference between substantive and procedural rights helps enormously in understanding the battles over applying the first eight amendments of the U.S. Constitution to the states. Procedural rights have failed; not only have they not improved procedures, they have made things worse.
Manchin's $1.5 trillion plan is still bigger than the Obama stimulus, and would be a major expansion of government's power to redistribute wealth.
Substantive rights have a core that can be meaningfully interpreted and protected; they can exist independently of a particular government or a particular legal system. Procedural rights lack such an independent core because they are necessarily embedded in a whole system of legal procedure, and they depend on that system for their meaning.
One of the big losers in the Illinois redistricting plan is Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a moderate Republican who voted to impeach Trump.
Congress prepares to assert its investigative authority.
Although the affinities between the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms and the Seventh Amendment right to civil jury trial seem strong, there are crucial differences. The first concerns individual accountability and the ability to understand responsibilities; the second concerns the distinction between substantive rights and procedural rights.
A Supreme Court decision against New York's gun control scheme would be a victory for both criminal justice reform and the Second Amendment.
Featuring Guatemala, New York, and Iran.
A state court has apparently placed a cap on UC Berkeley enrollment increases due to inadequate environmental review.
Without attention to the onerous permitting process for offshore wind and other energy projects, efforts will be plagued by costly delays.
Court finds that a Canton, Michigan ordinance requiring mitigation for tree removal constitutes an uncompensated taking.
Plus: Why "reforming" Section 230 makes little sense, the FDA finally admits vaping is safer than smoking, the U.S. will reopen its land borders with Canada and Mexico, and more...
Demand Justice's Balls and Strikes provides more heat than light.
Some environmentalists seem to care more about triggering endangered species regulation than endangered species conservation.
Is the problem government cash or have we entered a new paradigm?
Governments should not design laws and regulations to frustrate judicial review.