You Want Checks and Balances? Stop Ignoring the Constitution When You're in Power
Once the trust in checks and balances is eroded, it's difficult to regain.
Once the trust in checks and balances is eroded, it's difficult to regain.
Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee need to step up their oversight game
States and industry will seek to roll back BLM's "vast overreach" of regulatory authority in court.
Unlike his predecessor, Trump has not even done us the courtesy of coming up with a laughable excuse.
Nigeria will have a higher population than the U.S. by mid-century, when one in four people on Earth will live in Africa.
Not only can entitlement programs be rolled back, but politicians who do it can even get re-elected.
The president's executive order on religious freedom lacks any sort of substance.
Job losses and price increases are on the horizon.
For reasons practical and political, the waivers included in the AHCA to earn Freedom Caucus support might be mostly useless.
Paris Agreement Climate Change
Instead, submit the Paris agreement as a treaty to Senate for a vote
No cities in the state have been targeted by the Justice Department for noncompliance, but never mind.
The problem that has long plagued reformers in the two controlling parties is the failure to put a stop to spending.
New draft of executive action does much less than rumored.
Libertarian-leaners are lonely voices on Capitol Hill opposing the latest bipartisan spending spree
Checks and balances are there for a reason.
Should Congress be allowed to forbid a private voluntary treatment because it's bad and discredited?
They paper over the fact that America enjoys extraordinary latitude when choosing how to interact with the rest of the world.
Innumerates number the ranks of politicians and bureaucrats.
A growing economy will undercut the appeal of his ethno-nationalist politics.
Some good news, but will there be any spending cuts?
The bipartisan Campus Accountability and Safety Act could cost colleges millions for failure to follow complex and costly new sexual-misconduct policies.
Supreme Court turns away transparency lawsuit trying to force release of Senate report.
The heart of the potential for conflicts of interests is not the Trump business empire. It's the presidential power to steer benefits to particular interests.
A union-controlled state agency trying to overturn a citizen initiative passed in San Diego has finally been rebuffed in court.
After an embarrassing correction, the paper mangles the details again.
Spurning talent is never a road to greatness.
"You better believe it."
He is baiting opponents to sue him.
Organizer decides he wants to continue to live in Russia.
California Supreme Court accepts appeal to lower court ruling that stopped workers from padding their pensions by an extra five years of service time.
The nation's father warned against "hyper-partisanship, excessive debt and foreign wars" in 1796. Why aren't we paying attention, asks John Avlon.
It feels like mercantilism, hammering imports while promoting exports.
Democrazy, his new memoir, explores the hidden side of Washington, D.C. where it's all about money, power, and...finger food.
Communities are finally starting to realize there's a better way.
Neil Gorsuch confirmation vote expected Friday.
Franklin Roosevelt had his own Breitbart, and radio was his Twitter.
Comparing the two SCOTUS nominees.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
A lot of parliamentary shenanigans, but ultimately everything in the Senate is 'majority rules'
A wave of new technologies is making it easier for us all to flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists.
A bill related to sex trafficking and Section 230 could have far-reaching consequences for web content, publishers, and apps.
The lethal consequences of a common, obscure hospital licensing law
Collecting $99 million and paying out $999 million in a single year is not a formula for success.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks