Guns

Guns, Privacy, and Freedom Benefit From New Tech Tools

A wave of new technologies is making it easier for us all to flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists.

|

David Cooper/ZUMA Press/Newscom

As it turns out, if you want to be a successful subversive, you probably shouldn't take on the moniker "Dr. Death" as you publicly tout your establishment-challenging ways. That's what Daniel Crowninshield did with regard to the unfinished firearm receivers he sold, to be completed on computer numerically controlled (CNC) mills in his North Sacramento, California, machine shop. Theoretically, customers operated the mills themselves, making the finished firearms legal. But an undercover agent insisted that shop employees did the honors, and Crowninshield got three and a half years in prison.

What's remarkable about this story isn't just Crowninshield's excessive enthusiasm in marketing his services, however. More important is what this story illustrates about the unenforceable nature of laws that people find oppressive—and the growing vulnerability of such restrictions.

Strictly speaking, Crowninshield's act of defiance was old-school; while he apparently used computer-controlled machines, there's no reason trained machinists couldn't have cranked out those receivers using traditional tools and their own skills—except, that is, for the (not so, as it turned out) plausible deniability that they were being operated by untrained customers. There was enough demand for such services that there was sometimes a line outside Crowninshield's shop, according to an undercover agent. AR-15 receivers invisible to government scrutiny, "in the hundreds at a minimum," were supposedly cranked out at that one North Sacramento operation.

But enthusiasts actually can and do personally operate Cody Wilson's push-button Ghost Gunner CNC mills—which Wired described as "absurdly easy to use." Again, there's enough demand for such services that hundreds of the high-tech machines have been sold, putting the manufacture of finished firearm receivers within reach of people who don't have machinists' skills. And there's no way of knowing how many finished receivers have been quietly knocked out on the devices after they're delivered. Which was the whole reason Wilson developed the Ghost Gunner, after demonstrating that a working, if simple, pistol could be created on a 3D printer.

Of course, this isn't just about things that go bang. Several years ago, Wilson teamed up with fellow crypto-anarchist Amir Taaki to develop DarkWallet, a Bitcoin wallet intended to add an extra layer of anonymity to the virtual currency so that financial transactions could more effectively evade official scrutiny. Development of DarkWallet briefly stalled as Taaki disappeared for a while on a lower-tech mission to shoot at ISIS troops on behalf of the Rojava enclave in northern Syria. But with Taaki back (though under investigation by British authorities over his Syrian adventure), the software is now available in beta form.

"I believe in the hacker ethic," Taaki said about not just DarkWallet, but his overall philosophy. "Empower the small guy, privacy and anonymity, mistrust authority, promote decentralized alternatives, freedom of information," he says. "These are good principles. The individual against power."

For good reason, Wilson and Taaki play central roles in Adam Bhala Lough's The New Radical, a documentary about activists who push the boundaries of technology that empowers individuals against the state. The film received a mixed reception at the Sundance film festival, the Los Angeles Times noted in January—not because of its quality, but because comfortably liberal attendees who like to think of themselves as the good guys realized they were among the targets of anti-authoritarians who look "to create fundamental political change by pushing for one or more of the following: an eradication of intellectual-property laws, radical free speech, fierce encryption to protect that speech, anonymous money (basically, digital currency not controlled or monitored by any government) and a general disdain for traditional legislative structures." And easily available weapons, of course.

Lough's film is a bit of a companion piece to Alex Winter's Deep Web, about Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, and Laura Poitras's Citizenfour, about Edward Snowden. All three films cover techno-activists who have challenged government authority (with high-stakes personal consequences, in the case of the imprisoned Ulbricht). These activists, promoting new means of empowering the old and natural human inclination to tell authority to go to hell, have had a big and continuing impact—perhaps bigger than some of them expected. Just poking government in the eye may have been the original aspiration of Cody Wilson and his allies when they set out to create the original, single-shot, 3D-printed gun.

"At our maximum as an organization, we were always trying to project these images of a future that was unwilled, or unwished for, on the part of our enemy," he told The Verge. "I was never actually trying to say, 'The solution is here, oh my God, we've done it.' I was trying to inject an undeniable nightmare-like scenario for power to receive, the power we believed we were opposing."

Since then, though, headlines about 3D-printed and CNC-machined guns have proliferated around the world, even when the modern technologies have nothing to do with the actual black market-produced weapons in question. This has government officials in full freak-out mode seeking to restrict that which was deliberately designed to be beyond their control.

Likewise, Edward Snowden's revelations about National Security Agency surveillance drives surging popular interest in encryption tools that have become ever-easier to use. This has authorities like FBI Director James Comey in a deep sulk over the public's resistance to surveillance.

And if Bitcoin and other virtual currencies haven't yet become full-fledged alternatives to government money, they have shown promise as havens from capital controls and financial scrutiny. Logically, that has establishment types upset that "non-state actors can use VCs to disrupt sovereignty and increase political and/or economic power," as the Rand Corporation warned.

Of course, the desire to be free has always competed with governments' desire to control. That many people don't automatically knuckle under isn't a new development. What's new, though, is the current wave of technologies making it easier to flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists.

Well, they makes it easier if you don't openly advertise your subversive activities under a catchy moniker.

NEXT: Firearms technology and the original meaning of the Second Amendment

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “…comfortably liberal attendees who like to think of themselves as the good guys realized they were among the targets of anti-authoritarians ….”

    Its funny to see that look in lefty eyes when they suddenly realize that they are the not the freedom loving hippees they thought they were. They are the authoritarians. Its like much of their life was a sham. They still double down on government though.

    1. You either die the liberal, or live long enough to see yourself become a communist.

    2. Government is The People you fucking idiot! Corporations are the rich! They are the real tyrants!

      1. you really believe this? so fucking deluded…they’re all tyrants, anyone, anywhere who is happy and willing to tell someone what to do & how to do it is a fucking tyrant…Rule 1…Mind your own fucking business; rule 2, see rule 1

        1. (he doesn’t, check the handle)

        2. Welcome to the future where Poe’s Law rules the Internet.

        3. Check your Sarcasm detector. I’m pretty sure it’s malfunctioning.

    3. Some of us have seen through the smokescreen and really appreciate this sort of “in yer eye, blighter” action. The trouble with most of the “hippie generation” is far too many of them simply swallowed what they were spoonfed by the likes of SDS, Hughie, Mansons, Ayers, Dohrn, etc. It didno’t help what many f the top entertainers catering to that market set the tone and content, either. Most of these former (?) hippies went on to “subvert” the education systems, some starting at the grade school “portal” levels, others going into university to subvert things there. Much of what we see today traces back to that era…. I well remember a two quarter course in “political philosophy” way back, full time examining Marx and his philosophies. When it came time to write the final, we were to find three things WRONG with Marx’ ideas, explain WHY they were wrong and would not work. Out of ninety in the class, ONE managed to accomplish this. Most could not find one thing wrong with anything we’d looked at for six months. THOSE lemmings are representative of those “in charge’ these days.

  2. If only the founding fathers had seen fit to include constitutional guarantees of free speech, the right to keep and bear arms, and protections for persons and property – – – – – – – –

    1. If only they had written in the Constitution limits on governmental power….

  3. A wave of new technologies is making it easier for us all to flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists.

    Before I clicked on the article I saw that sub-head and thought to myself “Flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists? This has to be a 2-Chilli article.”

  4. Is the middle… thing, in the picture a movie prop, a gun or a gun made to look like a movie prop?

    1. That is a Plasma Univerter with Solid State Interface. A P.U.S.S.I. for short.

      1. Ah, must be Consolidated Headmelter’s new model. I hadn’t seen it yet.

  5. Run silent, run deep. I’d suggest taking that NRA sticker off your bumper and slapping on a Coalition To Stop Gun Violence in its place. It’s the same reason I donate a few bucks to the local sheriff’s organization and get that little sticker proclaiming I proudly support our heroes in blue.

    1. Depends where you are. A lot of places, the NRA sticker helps you blend in.

      Or just don’t put stickers on your car.

      1. Or put an NRA sticker on your Subaru, and really confuse people.

  6. Lough’s film is a bit of a companion piece to Alex Winter’s Deep Web, about Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, and Laura Poitras’s Citizenfour, about Edward Snowden.

    I’ll have to see it, then. It probably won’t make me as angry as Deep Web or as intrigued as Citizenfour, but I doubt I’ll be shifting uncomfortably in my seat like the useful idiots at Sundance.

  7. “Crowninshield’s act of defiance was old-school”

    What act of defiance? The man allowed himself to be dragged off and locked in a cage for years without so much as firing off a shot in self-defense. Guns will only protect you if you have the brains and stones to use them as they’re intended. The gun fetishists at Reason should learn this.

  8. More important is what this story illustrates about the unenforceable nature of laws that people find oppressive?and the growing vulnerability of such restrictions.

    But I don’t understand what you’re saying. I thought this was a nation of laws ? of laws, I tell you! ? according to Trumpistas. And laws on the books should be enforced so that we can all reach the Nirvana their fearless leader promised.

    Or is there such a thing as unenforceable laws? Am I being lied to?

    1. Both laws and freedom? Balancing act?

      I thought it was supposed to be a sea of freedom with island of restrictions, instead of the opposite in which we now find ourselves.

      Regulators regulate. It’s just what they do, and they love to expand themselves at every opportunity.

  9. Wow, I met the Taaki guy in Syria.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.