Democrats Don't Have a Filibuster Problem. They Have a Joe Manchin Problem.
The problem isn’t the GOP or Senate rules. It’s that Democrats can’t agree amongst themselves.
The problem isn’t the GOP or Senate rules. It’s that Democrats can’t agree amongst themselves.
And, within those policies deemed "carbon pricing," a carbon tax is preferable to cap-and-trade.
Plus: The link between college and moral absolutism, environmental activists vs. Facebook, and more...
Despite what the media and politicians have said, that isn't how this works.
The same logic would apply to Orthodox Jewish women, and to men who wear religious headgear,
The expulsions, ordered by the CDC for the supposed purpose of stopping the spread of Covid-19, are illegal for much the same reasons as was the CDC eviction moratorium recently struck down by the Supreme Court.
The law's "vagueness permits those in power to weaponize its enforcement against any group who wishes to express any message that the government disapproves of," Judge Mark Eaton Walker warns.
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized the authority of the United States...to seek equitable relief to vindicate various federal interests and constitutional guarantees.”
Free speech and occupational licensing collide.
Biden's plan will raise taxes on individuals earning as little as $30,000 annually by 2027, but that's just a trick to make the overall cost of the bill look lower than it really is.
Plus: "The endless catastrophe of Rikers Island," studies link luxury rentals and affordable housing, and more...
Judge Paul Bonin profited from making defendants wear ankle monitors. The victims can't sue.
The Justice continues his media book tour without commenting on his potential retirement.
A broad standard with no exceptions better serves his goals, but it will be harder to defend in court.
A precedent allowing federal officers to be held civilly liable for constitutional rights violations has come under fire.
A new analysis projects that private capital, wages, and America's GDP will fall over the next three decades if Congress passes the $3.5 trillion reconciliation package. But at least government debt will grow!
Plus: Vaccine mandates are popular, Texas versus free speech, and more...
An interesting exploration of what happens when high courts are evenly divided.
The presidency has always been inclined to unilateral power—and many Americans like it that way.
Exploring the legal issues raised by another of the Biden Administration's newly announced COVID policies.
Why legal challenges to the new rule are more likely to focus on the details than on broad challenges to OSHA's authority.
Some parts are both good policy and legally unproblematic. Others - particularly the mandate imposed on private employers - are legally dubious and would set a dangerous precedent if upheld by courts.
OSHA has rarely used this option, which avoids the usual rule-making process, and most challenges to such edicts have been successful.
Emergency OSHA rules are frequently struck down by courts.
Plus: The vaccine and abortion debates, a promising jobs report, and more...
Biden's sudden embrace of a federal vaccine requirement seems inconsistent with his acknowledgment that he cannot mandate every COVID-19 precaution he'd like people to follow.
If they're good enough for Europeans, surely they're good enough for Americans.
The federal health care program is on track for a trust fund shortfall in just five years. But instead of paying for the program that exists, Democrats want to expand it.
S.B. 8 relies on litigation tricks that conservatives have long condemned as a threat to the rule of law.
Plus, why is no one talking about the Medicare Trustees' entitlement report?
Yale Law School Prof. Cristina Rodriguez and I discussed this timely subject with host Stephen Henderson.
While libertarians will be inclined to applaud some of the new laws, others exemplify familiar conservative excesses.
The same legal ruse can be used against gun rights and other civil liberties, not just against abortion.
A federal judge says an anti-porn group's suit against Twitter can move forward, in a case that could portend a dangerous expansion of how courts define "sex trafficking."
Professors Zachary Price and Benjamin Eidelson offer competing takes.
In his new book, the 83-year-old justice warns court-packing advocates to “think long and hard before embodying those changes in law.”
Only in extreme circumstances should a court come between a parent and their child.
Without policy changes, beneficiaries will receive only 78 percent of what was promised starting in 2034.
Compared to pandemic employment shifts in other fields, law enforcement numbers are fairly stable.
Plus: Biden's Afghanistan speech, Texas abortion ban takes effect, Instagram's creepy new plan, and more...
A Feddie Fight Night on the Administrative State featuring Prof. Gary Lawson and Prof. Nicholas Bagley
Thwarted politicians rant, pout, and are outraged by anybody who pushes back.
The president seems determined to anoint the agency’s director as the nation’s COVID-19 dictator, no matter what the law says.
The Army Corps and EPA were happy to have the Trump Administration rule remanded, as they are working on a more expansive replacement that will itself face legal challenge.
The health program won't be able to pay all of its bills starting in 2026, according to a new Trustees report.
Not everything potentially beneficial should be mandatory and not everything potentially harmful should be banned. And not every dispute about costs and benefits should be decided by the federal government.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks