Trump's Reading of the Alien Enemies Act Defies the Usual Meaning of Its Terms
To justify the immediate deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, the president is invoking a rarely used statute that does not seem to apply in this context.
To justify the immediate deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, the president is invoking a rarely used statute that does not seem to apply in this context.
"Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision," Roberts noted after Trump said federal judges who impede his agenda should be fired.
In 2020, the Chief Justice condemned Senator Schumer's "dangerous" remarks.
Threats to impeach federal judges who rule against the government are a naked attack on their constitutionally crucial function.
The Judicial Conference again asks Congress to create more judicial seats to address judicial backlogs.
Why is the Supreme Court issuing fewer summary reversals? Is Justice Barrett the reason?
The administration may be moving in that direction. If does so and gets away with it, the consequences are likely to be dire.
Suggestions that the Executive Branch Ignore Federal Court Rulings May Look Different Today than When They Were Proposed.
"I know they are guilty," otherwise "they would not be in front of me," said town justice Richard Snyder, who resigned in December.
A dissent from the denial of certiorari in another Sixth Circuit Habeas case.
A good example of why the D.C. Circuit's website upgrade was actually a step backwards.
Roberts identifies genuine problems, but little in the way of good solutions. He also sometimes overlooks ways in which the Supreme Court is partly responsible for the challenges the judiciary faces.
It is apparently unacceptable that some of the new judges would be appointed by a Republican.
There was bipartisan support for the JUDGES Act, but the election results appear to have changed that.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reminds us that there are limits to Article III.
Donald Trump will have at least one less federal district court vacancy to fill.
He’ll be around to protect our freedom for a few more years.
A recent website "upgrade" is not an improvement.
Another interesting aside in the Royal Canin oral argument.
An amusing and potentially revealing exchange in a recent oral argument.
Remembering the first time a partisan Senate minority blocked a judicial nomination that enjoyed majority support.
A panel examining what is in store for October Term 2024.
An interesting question divides a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
A prominent appellate practitioner responds to recent attacks on the justices and the Court.
Could a panel of lower court judges evaluate ethics complaints against Supreme Court justices?
A new empirical study assesses the "quality" of Trump's judicial nominations.
In the same week that Jack Smith refiles his Trump Indictment, Justice Jackson talks about the SCOTUS decision that made refiling necessary.
The justices are hearing future cases, but that has not sped up their work.
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
Thanks to C-Span, video is now available.
Joan Biskupic reports that the justices were initially inclined to back Idaho in the EMTALA case, until they realized the case was messier than they had thought.
Candid end of term comments from one of the Court's progressive justices.
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel comes for the "censorious" Judge Tim Grendell
The decision agreed with Trump that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed, which could have positive downstream effects for the rest of us, as well.
Activists and politicians look for almost any excuse to claim that judges should withdraw from cases. Their calls for recusal may be frivolous, but it gives them an opportunity to criticize judges they don't like.
That some legal commentators are surprised by Justice Barrett may say more about Court commentary (and the way she was caricatured when nominated) than it does about Justice Barrett.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
Although critics say the Court’s current approach is unworkable, it has been undeniably effective at defeating constitutionally dubious gun regulations.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
The Court's grant of certiorari is limited to only one of the issues in this litigation.
The justices are rushing to close out the term before the end of June.
The justices still have over one-third of the term's cases remaining.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10