Feds Arrest 'Occupy ICE' Protesters in Portland
Officers in riot gear made their move Thursday in an attempt to reopen Immigration and Customs Enforcement headquarters in Portland.
Officers in riot gear made their move Thursday in an attempt to reopen Immigration and Customs Enforcement headquarters in Portland.
More than 100 Republicans voted against the GOP's "compromise" bill.
Comparing the records of two right-of-center justices.
The op ed outlines some of the grave flaws in today's Supreme Court ruling.
Some preliminary comments on a badly flawed ruling.
Anti-immigrant fearmongers of demographic doom proved wrong in the 19th and 20th centuries, and today's will be no different.
"The Government has set forth a sufficient national security justification to survive rational basis review."
The U.S. has nearly unlimited power to decide when foreigners are admitted to the country, even based on factors (such as ideology, religion, and likely race and sex) that would be unconstitutional as to people already in the country.
In a narrow, 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction against Travel Ban 3.0, while also declaring Korematsu has been overruled.
Reason editors grapple with disassociation etiquette, family separation, third-party legal doctrine, health association plans, and the existential despair of Fozzie Bear
The political advantages of the president's zigzagging on family separation and the "Muslim ban" are not obvious.
"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant...you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them."
It is well-established that everyone within the United States, even those who may have entered illegally or over-stayed a visa, are entitled to Due Process.
No pesky Romulans, Klingons, Ferengis or Vulcans to get in way of Terran colonization of the galaxy
"There's no constitutional authority for [ICE]," says Dale Kerns. "There's really no need for them, either."
Misleading claims about people smuggling serve only to justify the government's already bloated surveillance and law enforcement powers.
Thirty years of data show "refugee burden" is a myth: Migrants to Europe have been a significant economic benefit
He seems to be backing away from criminally prosecuting all unauthorized border crosses
The company has no legal obligation to let alien hunters harass its customers unless they have a warrant or probable cause.
The ruling also raises questions about the future viability of "Chevron deference."
The great negotiator acts like a mafia boss
Trump's approach has been a model of brutality, inflicting unspeakable horror on children and parents.
The administration says it will continue its "zero tolerance" approach to illegal immigration.
People who supported Trump's policy justified it by falsely claiming that today's critics never cared about Obama's detention facilities.
An unsatisfying answer to the question of why Trump country seems unfazed by immigrant family separation.
Improving smuggling efforts isn't ideal, but it's better than just watching kids get torn from their families.
Mike Pompeo celebrates World Refugee Day by bragging about America's "leadership" on the issue, but the numbers tell a different story
Trump can't escape responsibility for the predictably cruel consequences of his "zero tolerance" immigration policy.
Nazi analogies do not strengthen the case against forcibly separating illegal border crossers from their children.
ICE claimed tattoos are evidence of gang activity, grounds for deportation.
Kris Kobach suffers legal, factual, and professional humiliation at the hands of a federal judge, though his conspiratorial cause still lives on at the White House.
Reason editors discuss what anti-immigration fantasy looks like when translated into policy, and how education diversity goals lead to discrimination.
We'd be outraged by the unnecessary pursuit if Americans had been killed.
The president's policy of separating families at the border is wrong, but he's enabled by a lack of legislative action dating back decades.
Plus: More evidence emerges that Harvard University discriminates against Asians.
The main justification for the Trump administration policy of forcibly separating immigrant children from their families is that it is supposedly mandated by law. This claim is both false on its own terms, and an inadequate defense even if it were true.
Zero tolerance enforcement against illegal border crossings turns Wal-Marts into essentially jails for kids.
Ripping kids from migrant parents is both lawless and cruel.
The decision is legally dubious. But it also highlights the arbitrariness of rules that exclude victims of horrible injustices just as severe as those luck enough to qualify.
Congresswoman says asylum seekers are denied 'basic human rights,' abused by Border Patrol.
Guerrillas forced the applicant to cook and clean for them, after killing her husband.
In the name of punishing minor border violations, his administration has become lawless
The ruling is the latest in long line of defeats for the administration's efforts to cut federal grants to sanctuary jurisdictions. It breaks new ground by showing how the recent Supreme Court ruling in Murphy v. NCAA helps sanctuary cities.
We should be increasing legal immigration and making it easier than ever to work here.
The Supreme Court's ruling was based on state officials' apparent hostility to the bakers' religious beliefs. There is far stronger evidence of such hostility in the travel ban case.
Civil import violations carry penalties tied to either the value of the article itself or to the taxes you would have been assessed if you'd declared it.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks