Trump, Reagan, and Why Republicans Flip-Flopped on Free Trade
The Donald is more like The Gipper on trade policy than you think. And not in a good way.
The Donald is more like The Gipper on trade policy than you think. And not in a good way.
More than 1,000 economists (including Nobel Prize winners) have penned an open letter to the White House, warning not to repeat mistakes of the past.
We restrict trade to punish our enemies. Why would we do the same to ourselves?
But working-class identity politics threaten to ruin everything.
You cannot advocate trade restrictions without also advocating state-bestowed privilege.
Some cities have warmed to them, but protectionist policies still oppress.
And they'll make lots of other things more expensive too.
Tariffs are an unnecessary step that will hurt American manufacturers and increase prices on a wide range of products, from cars to beer cans.
Meanwhile, tariffs pile up on products that lots of Americans actually buy.
The administration pushes harsh protectionist measures at the Montreal NAFTA talks.
The Jones Act drives up consumer prices by protecting U.S. companies from competition. Guess who insists it must be kept intact?
The escalating tit-for-tat over trade policy risks an all-out trade war.
A backwards, protectionist law mandating an obsolete job has been only slightly relaxed.
A judge suspends oppressive city regulations as too vague, but the fight's probably not over.
An old federal law demolishes the development of some domestic tourism markets.
Protectionism at play? Politicians say food trucks are "unfair competition" for restaurants.
Without American participation, everyone could end up worse off-particularly Americans.
Protectionist measures hurt American workers and consumers.
Hurricane Irma sheds light on the hidden costs of yet another protectionist measure.
The idea is sadly gaining steam.
Is it just more bluster from the White House? Let's hope so.
DHS ends waiver of protectionist shipping law that drives up costs.
Don't ruin it with protectionist trade policies.
Reason's Nick Gillespie, Katherine Mangu-Ward, and Matt Welch on the Las Vegas shooting, Trump's Twitter rage at Puerto Rico, and the Jones Act.
Anti-dumping tariffs don't lead to more fairness, they just lead to more tariffs.
A bankrupt Chinese-owned taxpayer-subsidized company that's asking for protection against Chinese imports.
Congress needs to vote to stop protecting shipping cartel from market competition.
If you can't change a single lousy law in the face of humanitarian crisis, how are you going to take on the tax code's thousands of special-interest blocs?
The president is doing everything he can do to alienate libertarians who believe in shrinking the size, scope, and spending of government.
John Stossel got an eyeglass prescription over the internet. "Bottleneckers" want that banned.
The EU can be quite protectionist, particularly vis a vis its eastern members.
American protectionism has repeatedly failed as an economic strategy.
How flag-waving nationalism provides cover for a destructive economic policy.
Truck operator: "I feel like this city is about nepotism, cronyism and favoritism."
A South Carolina Supreme Court decision rejects rules based on economic protectionism.
Steel imports are no more a threat to U.S. national security than imported sugar or lumber or tulips.
In a political sense, the issue is much like fighting climate change.
The Mississippi catfish cartel vs. the Chesapeake invader-eaters
Taxing automation would slow down progress and ultimately make most of us poorer than we would otherwise be.
Pietra Rivoli, author of The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy, talks to Reason about the politics of trade.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks