Trump Bragged About Lower Gas Prices. Then He Bombed Iran.
You can have low gas prices or war in the Middle East, but not both.
You can have low gas prices or war in the Middle East, but not both.
Lawmakers are refusing to acknowledge what is increasingly looking like a big, long war.
Supporters of Trump's actions want to create an aura of necessity to shield the president from urgent criticism.
The article explains why the war requires congressional authorization,and why this requirement is important.
Plus: Congress shrugs, a cat cafe unionizes, and Liz Wolfe checks in, and more...
The president has no lawful authority to launch a war absent a congressional declaration of war.
Plus: Congress is reluctant to assert its war powers, the Pentagon brands Anthropic a national security threat, and a listener asks whether regime change is ever morally defensible.
Trump and his team can’t get their story straight on why they started this war, how long they plan to fight it, and whether they'll put boots on the ground.
Plus: 3 Americans killed in retaliation, former President Bill Clinton testifies about Jeffrey Epstein, and more...
The administration was wrong to unilaterally and unconstitutionally commit the U.S. to war.
Khamenei's rule was marked by a combination of cruelty and incompetence. His death may have unfolded much the same way.
"And Congress is on the hook as much as the president."
Trump's attack on Iran is obviously unconstitutional. The moral and policy issues are a closer call.
OpenAI has entered a contract with the Defense Department allowing all lawful use of ChatGPT after Anthropic refused to remove its restrictions on domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems.
The war is aimed at regime change, has spread across the Middle East, and was started without the consent of the American people.
Dario Amodei penned a public letter explaining the danger of the Defense Department's request to remove certain constraints from Claude, and refusing them outright.
Pete Hegseth has threatened to invoke the Defense Production Act to force Anthropic to come around.
Plus: the same ole hawkish lies, a familial connection to Barry Goldwater's nomination, and the future of media is prediction markets on Substack.
A grand jury and a federal judge rejected the president’s vendetta against legislators who produced a video about the duty to refuse unlawful military orders.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon notes that Sen. Mark Kelly's comments about unlawful military orders were "unquestionably protected" by the First Amendment.
Our Afghan allies deserve better treatment from the Trump administration as many live under uncertainty during a visa pause.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Spurred by a hostile U.S. president, Europe struggles against stagnant economies to rearm.
Maintaining a uniformed domestic security force is pricey in terms of life, liberty, and dollars.
The legal rationale for bombing suspected drug boats in the Caribbean doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Prof. Josh Braver questions the conventional wisdom on this issue.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
The problem is not that revolution is bad or that some cultures can’t rule themselves—it’s that social engineering is hard.
The president's son also claims destroying cocaine boats somehow reduces fentanyl overdoses, echoing his father's confusion.
This foolish, unnecessary, bellicose idea is running up against the "Lizardman's Constant."
The unrest started with a merchants' strike, escalated into a bloody crackdown—and might become an American war.
By deposing Maduro but keeping his brutal regime in power, the U.S. implicitly endorses its crimes.
When we use our military and roll the dice with the fate of nations, the consequences play out in a much longer time frame than social media trends.
Polar War demonstrates how difficult it is for armies to operate in the high north—and just how far America is behind Europe in Arctic warfare.
If an indictment is enough to justify military action, why bother seeking congressional approval?
His explanation for why the Trump administration attacked Venezuela without congressional authorization does not stand up to scrutiny.
Nicolás Maduro’s removal should be welcomed by anyone who values liberty. Yet data show Americans—led by the youngest adults—are turning noninterventionist.
When asked who would be in charge, Trump said: “We’re designating those people.”
The strikes against Venezuela and the capture of Nicolás Maduro might be popular or defensible. They were not legal.
Uniformed and armed men and women can be seen all over the city wielding leaf blowers, hoses, and brooms as they do municipal chores.
Even as the president blows up drug boats, the government routinely declines to pursue charges against smugglers nabbed by the Coast Guard.
Plus: the limits of Zohran Mamdani's ability to ruin New York, Trump's National Guard withdrawal, and a deadly New Year's blaze in Switzerland
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
The decision is a preliminary "shadow docket" ruling. But it strongly suggests the majority believes Trump's use of the Guard is illegal.
The justices suggested the president is misinterpreting "the regular forces," a key phrase in the statute on which he is relying.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks