What Would Bill Buckley Do?
The National Review founder's flexible approach to politics defined conservatism as we know it.
The National Review founder's flexible approach to politics defined conservatism as we know it.
I coauthored the article with four other legal scholars from across the political spectrum.
A feisty, cancel-culture provocation that isn't willing to commit.
A joint statement and a solo analysis of the Compact's problems
It is forthcoming in Academic Freedom in the Era of Trump, (Lee Bollinger and Geoffrey Stone, eds., Oxford University Press).
The lack of intellectual pluralism undermines the truth-seeking function of the university.
Interesting results from a survey of undergraduates at two universities.
University Presidents are divided on how to respond to pressure from the Trump Administration. Are their concerns too little, too late?
The university's president has maintained that Harvard will not risk losing its academic freedom, and it may delay any settlement negotiations until after a final court ruling.
My new article in the First Amendment Law Review's symposium on campus free speech
My new article on diversity statements in faculty hiring and the First Amendment
To reinstitute $400 million in federal funding, the university agreed to implement plans to combat antisemitism and to appoint an independent monitor to oversee changes.
Plus: City-run grocery stores, Peronists for prison, California can't figure out how minimum wage hikes work, and more...
Universities should be wary of adopting practices or policies that "discourage curiosity and reward narrowness of thought."
Under the bills, homeschooling curricula would have to meet state learning standards and students would be required to complete annual wellness checks.
The appeals court vacated a preliminary injunction that had been based on her First Amendment rights
Matthew Finkin dissects how the American Association of University Professors has abandoned a principle defense of academic freedom.
Even if the president was joking in both cases, he already has used his powers to punish people whose views offend him.
Under new State Department guidance, having private or no social media presence "may be reflective of evasiveness and call into question [a student visa] applicant's credibility."
A conversation with Eugene Volokh on the First Amendment issues of the Trump administration's actions
Trump is wielding the state against a school whose politics he doesn't like.
An explainer from Cass Sunstein
Can Trump do that, and what would it mean?
The Harvard psychologist discusses recent gains for free speech at Harvard, growing political and ideological threats to academic freedom, and the importance of shared knowledge in sustaining truth and progress.
The administration's demands extend far beyond its avowed concern about antisemitism and enforcement of "civil rights laws."
Plus: Democrats visit El Salvador, Taiwan invasion possibilities, Hayek on rule of law, and more...
Apparently freezing $2 billion in federal funding wasn't enough.
Brown is violating its code of conduct, which guarantees community members’ right to petition the university.
A lawsuit brought by universities could potentially be much more effective than leaving individual students to fend for themselves.
A conversation with David Cole
Border officials reportedly barred the academic from visiting Texas after finding anti-Trump messages on his phone.
Is the experiment over?
Just eight colleges had official neutrality policies before the attack. By the end of 2024, it was almost 150.
The podcast relaunches with a conversation with Cary Nelson
New guidance makes explicit what should have been clear already: Standard 208 obligates law schools to embrace First Amendment principles.
Officials allegedly retaliated against a professor who expressed politically controversial statements about the best treatments for gender dysphoria among youth.
Conforming speech policies to the First Amendment would serve private universities well, legally and otherwise.
Officials ordered schools to review all courses with descriptions or syllabi that contain words such as Israel, Palestine, and Jewish.
A new survey from the Knight Foundation found that more than 1 in 4 college students agreed schools should prohibit "speech they may find offensive or biased."
A Harvard Dean suggests universities can and should limit controversial speech.
Harvard is taking steps away from politicization. Will other schools follow?
Following months of campus protests over the war between Israel and Hamas, the university has announced that it will no longer weigh in on current events.
You Can't Teach That! is in fine bookstores now
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks