The Academic Freedom Podcast is Back!
The podcast relaunches with a conversation with Cary Nelson
The podcast relaunches with a conversation with Cary Nelson
New guidance makes explicit what should have been clear already: Standard 208 obligates law schools to embrace First Amendment principles.
Officials allegedly retaliated against a professor who expressed politically controversial statements about the best treatments for gender dysphoria among youth.
Conforming speech policies to the First Amendment would serve private universities well, legally and otherwise.
Officials ordered schools to review all courses with descriptions or syllabi that contain words such as Israel, Palestine, and Jewish.
A new survey from the Knight Foundation found that more than 1 in 4 college students agreed schools should prohibit "speech they may find offensive or biased."
A Harvard Dean suggests universities can and should limit controversial speech.
Harvard is taking steps away from politicization. Will other schools follow?
Following months of campus protests over the war between Israel and Hamas, the university has announced that it will no longer weigh in on current events.
You Can't Teach That! is in fine bookstores now
The bill would allow the Education Department to effectively force colleges to suppress a wide range of protected speech.
DEI statements are political litmus tests.
Plus: A listener asks if there is any place libertarians can go to start their own country or city state.
"If we can't trust ourselves as a culture to accommodate ideas we don't like," the novelist said at the Library of Congress, "then our ideas lose their value as well, because they become authoritarian."
A member of Congress weighs in, and the university president speaks out
An Israeli minister demands that Princeton University prohibit a professor from assigning a controversial book
A response to Porter v. North Carolina State University
State tries to bar Stanford researchers from testifying against it
Professor suspended for criticizing policies of Texas lieutenant governor
Texas A&M placed a professor on paid leave for criticizing Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick in a lecture on the opioid crisis.
Blame university administrators.
Political appointees should have no role in faculty hiring decisions.
Is "intramural" professorial speech protected by the First Amendment?
But Chris Rufo bragged about breaking the law anyway.
Doctor sanctioned for comments to journalists about transgender athletes
James Madison University's debate team says that "free speech should not extend to requiring us to platform or amplify ideas that are exclusionary, discriminatory, or hostile."
Martha Pollack rejects the pernicious premise that universities should protect students from offensive ideas.
How bad is that divisive concepts bill?
Legislative showdown looming on tenure and academic freedom
North Dakota attack on tenure barely defeated
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
A poorly drafted and conceptually ambitious upending of norms of state university independence
Some of the proposals pose real threats to free inquiry
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
"My artwork is unapologetic," said the artist. "Sometimes it can be very political. Sometimes it can be very controversial."
Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Aaron Snyder argue that we should not kid ourselves about the threat university DEI bureaucracies pose to academic freedom, but is there a better way?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10