Prospective Legal Challenges to Trump's Section 338 Tariffs Against Canada
A guest post by Georgetown legal scholars Peter E. Harrell and Jennifer Hillman.
A guest post by Georgetown legal scholars Peter E. Harrell and Jennifer Hillman.
It's been more than eight years since Trump's first aluminum tariffs were imposed. How long do we have to wait before calling this a failure?
"There is no domestic alternative" for peppercorns grown in Zanzibar or herbs from the south of France, says Ori Zohar, the former Shark Tank contestant taking the administration to court.
The president’s protectionism has constituted the largest tax increase since 1993.
The president's latest round of broad import taxes, like the previous two, treats his statutory authority as an afterthought.
Economist David Hebert highlights an underappreciated danger of Trump's tariff mania. It's a serious problem, but one that can at least be mitigated.
The BLT—a delicious celebration of the power of markets—exemplifies political attacks on the free movement of goods and people.
It was filed by several businesses, including Learning Resources, Inc., which was also involved in the IEEPA tariff litigation.
The complaint explains why the tariffs violate the requirements of Section 301, and also run afoul of the major questions and nondelegation doctrines.
The Section 301 tariffs announced on Thursday overstep the powers granted by Congress and likely run afoul of the major questions doctrine.
Plus: House votes on war powers as Trump enters Iran war "revenge mode," Ted Cruz worries about AI, Marvel movies are planned through 2042, and more...
The new policy is based on sham investigations, and runs afoul of the major questions and nondelegation doctrine.
The U.S. economy is not a reality show. The Trump administration should stop acting like it is.
From rent control and Medicare for All to tariffs, politicians left and right are embracing policy ideas that have been repeatedly shown to not work.
The trade war caused exports to Canada to fall. Now, Trump is pointing to that fact to justify more tariffs.
The 50% tariffs on many Canadian imports are based on the long-defunct Section 338 of the notorious Smoot-Hawley tariff act.
Plus: new tariffs on Brazil, Trump's primetime address on election security, and the growing popularity of democratic socialism.
The idea is simultaneously harmful and illegal.
It's almost like there is no real underlying principle guiding the Trump administration's tariff policies.
From executive power to civil liberties, what to make of a momentous year at SCOTUS?
Important progress has been made on repaying illegally collected tariffs. But serious problems remain, including some caused by the Trump Administration's efforts to keep some of the illegally collected loot.
The Federal Reserve reports that small businesses were less likely to be able to avoid tariff costs during 2025 and are more pessimistic about employment and revenue in 2026.
The conservative justice pushed for greater executive authority even in cases in which Trump won.
Three different VC bloggers were among the speakers: Jonathan Adler, Keith Whittington, and myself.
Why Trump lost big in the Supreme Court cases he cared the most about
Free trade is "a direct affront to our Founding Fathers," President Donald Trump said during his first presidential campaign.
The decision not to renew the USMCA is less dramatic than it might appear. Even so, Trump is exchanging stability for more uncertainty.
The White House quietly repealed tariffs on Moroccan fertilizer this week.
Economist Soumaya Keynes discusses Trump’s tariff policies, how China changed the global economy, and why trade wars require restraint.
When businesses in other countries produce more goods than their domestic markets can use, is that a conspiracy against America? Of course not.
A guest post by Georgetown legal scholar Peter E. Harrell.
The ruling is flawed on both substantive and procedural grounds.
The president has repeatedly argued that courts have no business deciding whether his actions are legal.
The ruling relies in part on the Supreme Court's decision in the tariff case.
The administration has paid $20 billion in refunds. Now, it is asking a federal appeals court to limit which businesses will get the rest.
They appear to be yet another illegal power grab, one that should be challenged in court.
Even as the White House backs away from its foolish tariff plans, the Trump administration keeps revealing why it should never have had these powers in the first place.
The Great American Cotton Plan will shell out millions in taxpayer funds, continuing the Trump administration’s pattern of paying off industries harmed by the president’s economic policies.
The only winning move is not to play. But if you must, a new book offers some suggestions.
They claim the injunction requiring refunds cannot be universal, and can only apply to those businesses who filed lawsuits seeking recovery.
The U.S. Treasury is trying to fight the kind of trade embargo that it usually imposes on other countries.
Though some of their products may have been redirected elsewhere, American farmers are likely eating most of the losses.
He famously said the Founders had created "a republic, if you can keep it." How have we kept it? And can we continue?
I gave the talk earlier this week.
They cost each American household roughly $1,000 in 2025, with more coming in 2026.
The decision means the injunction blocking collection of the tariffs will not be blocked while litigation continues.
Johan Norberg discusses what makes societies prosperous, why protectionism and nostalgia keep returning, and how populism feeds cultural decline.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.