Biden's Attempts To Forgive Student Debt Were a Disaster
While the administration was fighting for debt forgiveness in court, it was also rolling out a broken FAFSA application form.
While the administration was fighting for debt forgiveness in court, it was also rolling out a broken FAFSA application form.
This week's House Budget Committee hearing showed bipartisan agreement about the seriousness of America's fiscal problems.
Everyone loves lower taxes, but cutting them without reducing spending is bad news for the national debt.
There's a good reason Biden eventually stopped saying Bidenomics. Americans didn't like the results of his economic policies.
A rate cap could leave millions scrambling for alternatives in an increasingly cashless economy.
Ambitious budget cuts will meet political reality in Trump’s second administration.
It would take nearly $8 trillion in budget cuts merely to stabilize the national debt so it does not grow faster than the economy.
Congress and the president show no interest in cutting government. Maybe outsiders can get it done.
Even before the pandemic spending increase, the budget deficit was approaching $1 trillion. The GOP has the chance to embrace fiscal sanity this time if they can find the political will.
The former president says the government should be funded like it was in 1890. So where's the plan to reset spending to 1890s levels?
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
The former president's increasingly lopsided economic policy proposals have the feel of throwing spaghetti at the wall.
This election is all about pursuing short-term political highs while willfully ignoring long-term problems. What could pair better with that than a cigarette?
When they entered the White House, the budget deficit was a pandemic-influenced $2.3 trillion, and it was set to fall to $905 billion by 2024. It's now twice what it was supposed to be.
According to recent data, people work less—and actually end up deeper in debt.
Spending increased by 10 percent last year, while tax revenue increased by 11 percent. Interest payments on the debt shot up by 34 percent.
Federal investigators say police in Lexington, Mississippi, used illegal searches, excessive force, and kept residents in jail when they couldn't pay off old fines.
If the former president wins the 2024 race, the circumstances he would inherit are far more challenging, and several of his policy ideas are destructive.
The budget could be balanced by cutting just six pennies from every dollar the government spends. It used to require even less.
Both party leaders are selling the idea of a sovereign wealth fund, but it’s more political fantasy than fiscal fix.
As conservatives push for cuts, lasting reform will require closing accountability gaps and restructuring entitlements.
Vice President Kamala Harris would add about $2 trillion to the deficit.
Both campaigns represent variations on a theme of big, fiscally irresponsible, hyper-interventionist government.
Lawmakers must be willing to reform so-called "mandatory spending," Pence's nonprofit argues in a new document.
The campaign promise from Donald Trump sounds nice, but it would be disastrous when considering the program is already racing toward insolvency.
Facing an economic downturn in the 1990s, Japan racked up debt. America should not repeat that mistake.
Should we blame Biden and the politicians applauding him for their unwillingness to address our looming fiscal disaster?
It's good to hear a candidate actually talk about our spending problem. But his campaign promises would exacerbate it.
The candidate supports gun rights, wants to privatize government programs, and would radically reduce the number of federal employees.
Reason's Emma Camp attended the Republican National Convention to ask attendees if they still believe in the power of free markets.
This week left no doubt that the GOP's current leadership wants the government to do more, spend more, and meddle more.
We asked delegates at the Republican National Convention whether a second Trump term would address America's debt problem.
There seems to be general bipartisan agreement on keeping a majority of the cuts, which are set to expire. They can be financed by cleaning out the tax code of unfair breaks.
Both parties—and the voters—are to blame for the national debt fiasco.
Opening night of the Republican National Convention programmed a central issue with a Trumpian twist: "Make America Wealthy Again."
Both parties—and the voters—are to blame for the national debt fiasco.
The Biden administration's $60 billion expansion of the IRS has netted $1 billion in new revenue so far.
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
The U.S. has successfully navigated past debt challenges, notably in the 1990s. Policymakers can fix this if they find the will to do so.
Those three presidential candidates are making promises that would have bewildered and horrified the Founding Fathers.
The national debt has become an alarm bell ringing in the distance that people are pretending not to hear, especially in the city that caused the problem.
Biden's incoherence and Trump's comparatively cogent lies demonstrate just how poorly the two-party system serves supporters of small government.
The candidate who grasps the gravity of this situation and proposes concrete steps to address it will demonstrate the leadership our nation now desperately needs. The stakes couldn't be higher.
Plus: A listener asks if there are any libertarian solutions to rising obesity rates.
The Congressional Budget Office reports the 2024 budget deficit will near $2 trillion.
We could grow our way out of our debt burden if politicians would limit spending increases to just below America's average yearly economic growth. But they won't even do that.
The president has tried to shift blame for inflation, interest rate hikes, and an overall decimation of consumers' purchasing power.
Reasonable options include gradually raising the minimum retirement age, adjusting benefits to reflect longer life expectancies, and implementing fair means-testing to ensure benefits flow where they're actually needed.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10