Hearing Examiner Recommends Approval of Women-Staffed Volunteer Ambulance Service for Orthodox Jewish Women,
but the New York City Regional Emergency Medical Services Council denied the application, by a 12-7 vote.
but the New York City Regional Emergency Medical Services Council denied the application, by a 12-7 vote.
Criminal charges were eventually dropped, and the civil lawsuit has just been thrown out.
That's the question in a First Amendment lawsuit, which a federal judge has allowed to go forward.
Vanity plates are private speech in a nonpublic forum, the court holds; restrictions on such speech must be viewpoint-neutral and reasonable.
Friday A/V Club: The 40th anniversary of Life of Brian's British debut—and of a legendary TV debate
But the technical nature of the decision might not stop future lawsuits.
Prof. Michael Broyde (Emory) responds to my post from a few weeks ago.
... as a condition of giving you a reasonable religious accommodation; quite right, I think, under Title VII religious accommodation principles.
An anthropologist examines secret societies, revolutionary movements, and esoteric ideas.
religious organizations' right to discriminate in some employment decisions, and federal funding conditions preferring local agencies that help federal immigration enforcement.
Snopes doesn’t seem to get the joke.
That's what flyers posted in Winchester (Massachusetts) say.
What’s at stake in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.
Justices rule that invitations are expressive speech and businesses cannot be compelled to write messages they oppose.
Harry Potter and the Baffling Return of Religious Panic
An economist and a science fiction author discuss cryogenics, mythology, philanthropy, fragmentation, and simulation.
Government officials fail to follow Supreme Court decisions at their own risk.
Activist Nury Turkel discusses the vast network of camps that may hold over a million Uighurs in western China.
The mysterious "hybrid rights" doctrine comes up again—but might not matter.
Editor in Chief Kyle Mann talks about being taken literally by fact checkers, whether any subject (even a mass shooting) is off limits, and the libertarian sensibility of his humor.
The viral clip was misleadingly edited, and stripped of important context
The long American spiritual tradition that gave us Marianne Williamson—and Donald Trump
The enrolled/participants requirement was part of a divorcing couple's custody agreement -- may a court interpret this as requiring the parent with Sunday custody to take the children to mass, or give up the relevant part of her parenting time?
So holds a Pennsylvania appellate decision.
Depends on how much of the face it covers, the California Court of Appeal seems to suggest.
So a New Jersey appellate court held today.
The U.S. Supreme Court had sent the case back down to be considered in light of the (narrow) Masterpiece Cakeshop decision.
By rejecting classical liberalism, Sohrab Ahmari and his ilk deny the dignity of the human person.
In which First Things throws a temper tantrum
Such a repeal wouldn't violate the Constitution, the opinion says (correctly, I think).
Not the sort of reasoning that's supposed to appear in American court opinions.
Director Penny Lane chronicles the rise of the Satanic Temple, a group that combines theatrical stunts with political activism.
The group takes its First Amendment crusade to a public park in Minnesota.
Director Penny Lane chronicles the rise of the Satanic Temple, a group that combines theatrical stunts with political activism.
He's promising voters protection from made-up threats instead of prosperity.
So holds the Third Circuit, though in a narrow opinion.
The Appellate Court of Illinois reverses a trial court decision that deferred to a Muslim divorce from India.
Is referring to someone as an "Easter worshipper" really an attempt to minimize their Christian identity?
A Pennsylvania court decision said they can (though relying on cases generally allowing restrictions on Public Trial Clause and First Amendment trial access rights in the interest of preventing embarrassment to witnesses).
The answer is no, despite conservatives' claims to the contrary. But that does not entirely resolve questions about the wisdom of the policy.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10