Stanford Prof. Michael McConnell on "Who Is a 'Minister'?"
Can the Supreme Court draw the line?
Can the Supreme Court draw the line?
While governments are shutting down religious services and fining pastors who defy those orders.
So a Maryland appellate court held last month, I think quite correctly (and consistently with the broad trend in other states):
The Obamacare contraception mandate continues to cause legal trouble.
The court concludes that it likely violates the Kentucky Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause, chiefly because the Governor's order has many exceptions for various allowed services.
On the same day Brooklyn’s Hasidic Jews came out for a funeral, hundreds were gathering elsewhere in New York City to watch a military flyover.
While denying Donald Trump's dictatorial impulses, William Barr notes that public health emergencies do not give governments unlimited powers.
A federal judge defended religious freedom by blocking a misguided ban on drive-in Easter services.
So holds a New York appellate court.
Did Louisville actually purport to ban drive-in church services, or was it just asking people to voluntarily refrain? And what notice did the City have about the temporary restraining order request?
Plus: Signal will leave the U.S. market if EARN IT passes, Justin Amash blasts Michigan shutdown orders, and more...
If people are allowed to go to bars, restaurants, libraries, schools, and factories (with suitable social distancing), should they also be allowed to go to church?
A federal judge blocks the Louisville ban on drive-in church services.
A "drafting snafu" with the Legislature's concurring resolution, which endorsed the Governor's initial emergency order, is casting many things in doubt.
That violates the Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and probably the freedom of assembly and association.
The annual retelling of the Exodus story reminds us not to take freedom for granted.
My guess is that these are quite unusual, but still noteworthy.
Religious liberty, public health, and the police powers of the states
I'll say it again: "Trust in Allah, but tie your camel."
... for violating New York City ban on gatherings of 50 people or more.
The restrictions are less dangerous precisely because they are so broad and onerous.
An interesting site, run out of the University of Pisa, covering breaking developments in many countries with many articles in English.
The Illinois Appellate Court's decision interprets the Illinois version of the RFRA, and the separate Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act (which bans all discrimination "because of [a] person's conscientious refusal to receive, obtain, accept, perform, assist, counsel, suggest, recommend, refer or participate in any way in any particular form of health care services contrary to his or her conscience").
The prison's actions satisfied the strict scrutiny test, a federal court just held, so the inmate loses.
State lawmakers want to override local zoning codes to let churches and other nonprofits build affordable housing on their own land.
Trump's failure to speak out against Modi's reign of lawlessness and terror is an epic abdication of responsibility.
The Supreme Court is about to tackle the issue.
The Supreme Court will decide whether three Muslims who refused to be informants can sue for damages under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
They want to scrap the citizenship rights of Indian Muslims because America helped Soviet Jews and Christians.
The Chinese Communist Party confiscated a sacred meteorite from Muslim herders. They're suing to get it back.
The courts may not strike it down. But it remains both illegal and deeply unjust.
How can prosecuting a black woman for slapping Jews in 2020 be authorized by the constitutional amendment that abolished slavery in 1865?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10