Privacy Board: Domestic Surveillance Guidelines Haven't Been Updated in 30 Years
Last revision 1984?
Will be publishing details about NSA's cooperation with UK intelligence
After secret court ruled NSA violated Constitution in 2011
Despite what we've been told
Ran in The Independent, not The Guardian
Result of FISA court demands to better separate domestic communications
Did he even read the part where the FISA court didn't know how certain processes worked for years?
Intercepts data that is shared with American intelligence services
Except that, today, it's worse
Interesting response to a local spying scandal
Constantly finds its old lies outdated and superseded by the need for new lies
So, basically, all of the official denials have been lies
FISA Court memo release shows the overseeing agency didn't know all the details of how surveillance actually worked
Even though destroying hard drives didn't destroy the widely disseminated data
Heavily redacted, but still somewhat readable
More than has been publicly acknowledged
Or rather, it finds it "difficult to imagine a scenario" in which they would.
20 al Qaeda leaders allegedly participated
Since they wanted information about inconvenient journalism
Even after they were told the data was backed up around the world
They already said there are no privacy concerns
How about some on theirs, too?
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
Applying a little pressure over spying revelations?
To refuse to serve the state is the highest crime
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.