White House Says it Wouldn't Force Reporters to Destroy Computers
Or rather, it finds it "difficult to imagine a scenario" in which they would.
Or rather, it finds it "difficult to imagine a scenario" in which they would.
20 al Qaeda leaders allegedly participated
Since they wanted information about inconvenient journalism
Even after they were told the data was backed up around the world
They already said there are no privacy concerns
How about some on theirs, too?
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
Applying a little pressure over spying revelations?
To refuse to serve the state is the highest crime
The president and congressional leaders are proven liars
For lying to Congress about spying
Can't have oversight when overseers aren't given information
Provide generic info when asking for permission to surveil from FISA court
And yes, they've accessed content
The snoops aren't going to like this
Why is Bloomberg afraid to equip New York City police with body cameras?
Congress not provided with important information prior to Patriot Act renewal
Look elsewhere for privacy
It would be a bit of a conflict of interest
A review of the NSA's surveillance managed by the executive branch can't really be called "independent"
Heading off the surveillance state
XBox One due out in November
How the president uses language as a cover for the abuse of power.
"Who's ever heard of this information being misused by the government. In what way?"
Fears of surveillance cause change of plans
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.