Florida Couple Fined $50 Per Day for 'Illegal' Treehouse on Their Own Property
Cited for building the treehouse without a proper permit, the family must now file for permits to tear it down.
Cited for building the treehouse without a proper permit, the family must now file for permits to tear it down.
House to vote on a bill that would codify unwarranted searches of Americans' communications.
The former California attorney general has a long history of hostility to Second Amendment rights.
Fired chemistry professor is suing the school.
Texas alone bans 10,000 books, including The Color Purple and Where's Waldo?
"This use of secret evidence may be occurring regularly in cases throughout the country."
Motel 6 sued for passing names along to ICE.
Politicians cast attacks on them as attacks on democracy. How self-serving.
Their attempts on the dark web had a less than 25 percent success rate
Should the U.S. join other countries in regulating certain speech? Can people even agree on what 'hate speech' is?
The President shut down the commission because numerous states refused to turn over voter data, citing concerns about privacy and state sovereignty.
With abortion pills easily accessible online, the issue could be a big one in coming years.
An amicus brief we recently filed in an interesting and important New York high court case.
Do we need a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to drive?
The federal government has no business using information gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act against Americans.
It isn't just parents. Cops, schools, reporters, bureaucrats and busybodies got in on the action this year.
An interesting incident from England, as reported by the Sunday Times.
Yes, said San Antonio police officers, arguing that a bar's license shouldn't be renewed -- "those remarks show what kind of people Bottom Bracket's owners really are and that they should not be allowed to operate a bar."
But there's no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment.
In the Huffington Post, not usually a source of positive views on guns.
The government's theory would equally criminalize insulting posts on a NRA page, or on a pro-Trump organization's page, or on a Communist Party page.
Two recent stories in the news, plus a third item about Malaysia.
A separate holding from today's Klein v. BOLI (Sweetcakes by Melissa case), from the Oregon Court of Appeals.
The Oregon Court of Appeals upholds a $135,000 damages award imposed on Sweetcakes by Melissa for its owners' refusal to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.
Nobody calls himself a censor anymore in the 21st century. We've got better words for it.
The city's goal is to curb "unconscious bias." But the policy is based on dangerous premises, and is likely to harm tenants more than it benefits them.
A woman is injured in a car accident supposedly because of bad roadway design decision (a dangerous cut in the median) -- so she sues business that had lobbied county to make that decision.
Short extension of FISA snooping powers shoved into temporary spending bill.
The crew of The Post celebrates leaking the Pentagon Papers but gets all touchy when Obama's secret surveillance is mentioned.
Free speech is increasingly triggering.
Will you soon be ordered to subject yourself to even more intrusive surveillance if you travel out of the country?
Jia Yueting got an injunction from a Washington state court, forbidding critic Gu Yingqiong from "publish[ing] any posts or [online] commentary concerning" Jia.
Accountability starts at home.
So held a federal court in New Jersey yesterday (GJJM Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Atlantic City).
Bruce Perens' claimed that Open Source Security's license violates the GPL open-source license agreement; that's protected opinion, the court said.
A Federal district court grants a preliminary injunction in V.A. v. San Pasqual Valley Unified School District.
The Justice Department's attempt to prosecute six anti-Trump protesters falls flat on its face, but it says more trials will follow.
The New Jersey Supreme Court narrowly construes a ban on annoying conduct to avoid First Amendment problems.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks