Clarence Thomas Calls To 'Reconsider' Gay Marriage, Sodomy Rulings
The other justices declined to join him, but the future of the Supreme Court rulings on those matters remains unclear.
The other justices declined to join him, but the future of the Supreme Court rulings on those matters remains unclear.
The complaining student alleged the students' remarks were "harassing and threatening" him because of his conservative "political affiliation" and his "religious beliefs."
Plus: Abortion and free speech, Juul fights back, and more...
"We could not abandon ongoing representations just because a client's position is unpopular in some circles."
The new rules would drop live hearings, bring back the single-investigator model, and limit accused students' options.
Justice Breyer and others argue that gun regulations deserve special judicial deference because Second Amendment rights create risks to life. But the same is true of many other constitutional rights.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is defending expression on campus and off as the ACLU becomes a progressive advocacy group.
“Properly interpreted, the Second Amendment allows a ‘variety’ of gun regulations,” Kavanaugh writes, invoking Antonin Scalia
A 6–3 ruling undermines attempts to hold police accountable for misconduct.
The Biden administration just proposed new rules that would undermine basic fairness in college sexual misconduct disputes.
“Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms,” says New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Plus: Employers sue over Florida's Stop WOKE Act, how inflation erodes financial privacy, and more...
Looking back at how abortion advertising bans played out last century may give us some idea what the future holds for speech about abortion.
The legislation prohibits firearm sales based on juvenile records and subsidizes state laws that suspend gun rights without due process.
World journalists have been quicker than Americans to see danger in prosecuting the Wikileaks founder.
Despite its opposition to gun rights for individuals, the ACLU's drift away from its core mission resembles the NRA's recent trajectory.
Senators are mulling legislation that would expand the categories of people who are disqualified from owning guns.
You’d think drag brunches are why we’re paying $6 a gallon for gas.
When a judge hearing a protection order petition thinks the defendant is engaged in "harassment," which can include two or more statements the judge thinks is libelous, the judge can effectively criminalize future libels of the plaintiff by the defendant.
What happens when YouTube and Facebook can be held liable for their users’ speech?
Plus: Uvalde cops didn't check classroom door, Texas GOP slides further to the right, telemedicine deregulation in peril, and more...
Far from being somehow at odds with July 4 and the Declaration of Independence, Juneteenth celebrates the greatest achievement of the principles of the Revolution.
Students sued to protect their First and 14th Amendment rights.
The plaintiff alleged that the Wardlaw-Hartridge School had failed to comply with its own procedural rules in the Student-Parent Handbook.
But here the Iowa Supreme Court reduced the verdict to $3M, with an interesting analysis of the law of libel.
Qualified immunity denied in case alleging a probable-cause-less arrest based on plaintiff's (comedian Hannibal Buress's) speech "roast[ing a police officer's] ass."
The WikiLeaks founder faces espionage charges for publishing classified U.S. information, a prosecution with serious implications for all our First Amendment protections.
"We enforce our policies equally for everyone," said a spokesperson.
Plus: Fentanyl copaganda, the perils of antitrust populism, a January 6 meme is born, and more...
A Snapchat post containing this line and "a copy of the police report summarizing [a witness's] identification of [a person] as the shooter" leads to a four-year prison sentence for witness tampering; a New Jersey court says the post is a constitutionally unprotected true threat of violence.
Big rulings are coming soon on school choice, guns, and abortion.
and reverses a precedent that suggested that viewpoint-neutral speech restrictions in public K-12 schools are generally permissible.
One of the very few jobs where you'd get to litigate free speech law every day
They shot and killed a man they were trying to evict. Doesn’t the public have the right to know who they are?
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.