Interesting Public Records vs. Academic Freedom Case Related to Animal Research
UPDATE: As predicted, PETA has moved to intervene. FURTHER UPDATE: The court has indeed allowed PETA to intervene.
UPDATE: As predicted, PETA has moved to intervene. FURTHER UPDATE: The court has indeed allowed PETA to intervene.
It all started with a stolen PlayStation 5.
One judge would have held that threats to injure reputation are criminalized by the law, but the other two disagreed.
The case stems from defendant's claims that plaintiff, a comic book writer, said racist things to her at a comic-book-business social function.
Such laws, which allow redundant prosecutions based on defendants' bigoted beliefs, supposedly are authorized by the amendment that banned slavery.
Will this follow-up to the famous wedding cake case finally decide if this is mandated speech violating the First Amendment?
"You'll have a bunch of people who plead to avoid trial or go broke trying to vindicate their rights."
The plaintiff, Frank Gogol, and the defendant, Malissa White, are both comic book writers.
So holds the Eleventh Circuit, as to dieticians, viewing itself as bound by an earlier decision involving interior designers.
on remand, jury must be instructed that it has to determine (among other things) whether the defendant “reasonably believed the conversation was not confidential.”
even though the video includes a brief appearance by a minor (a friend of plaintiff's).
But the claims against Donald J. Trump, Jr. and Rudy Giuliani are dismissed.
Kokomo officials agree not to enforce ordinance banning “obscene, indecent, or immoral” signs against flag that says “Fuck Biden and fuck you for voting for him.”
According to a former federal prosecutor, the seemingly redundant case sends "the message that the Justice Department won't tolerate this type of racist hatred."
In the new book Free Speech, the Danish activist defends radical self-expression from Socrates to social media.
"The jurors repeatedly assured the Court's law clerk that these notifications had not affected them in any way or played any role whatever in their deliberations."
Plus: Trafficking visas, a new no-fly list?, and more...
"He hath no more law than [a monkey/bull/goose]" vs. slight mischaracterization of legal advice.
N.Y. appellate court reverses the order.
The conservative think tank identifies some genuine concerns about tech companies, but gets the prescription wrong.
The ad was an ad for a college that he had attended.