Lawsuit Argues That School Choice Is a First Amendment Issue
Nebraska plaintiffs say the state can’t mandate education and also control what kids are taught.
Nebraska plaintiffs say the state can’t mandate education and also control what kids are taught.
"Beginning in the summer of 2020, the school began to change its curriculum to focus on politicized issues of race and gender identity. At some point, the Turpins learned that the school was teaching their sixth-grade child various polarizing concepts such as 'Republicans are white supremacists.'"
A federal appeals court ruled that Curtis Whateley's anti-police vanity plate was private speech protected by the First Amendment. Virginia says it will seek review from the Supreme Court.
The Oregon senator's "For Our Republic Act" would check many of the president's abuses while preserving the powerful federal state he commands.
Press groups are suing Trump Media over the scheme, calling it “profoundly corrupt.”
The decision turns on the particulars of the scheme for federal enforcement of Title VI.
Meta is on trial for fomenting "FOMO," among other things. It sounds silly, but the playbook used here could work against religious groups, fast food, and much more.
The court is unmoved by plaintiff's claims that defendants' coverage of the underlying dispute led to people threatening her.
"is just too damned long"—no, actually, it "includes the kind of extraordinary level of extraneous detail that necessitates repleader."
Jane and I examine the Robby Starbuck v. Google decision, one of the first major court opinions arising from generative AI "hallucinations."
"But the mental-health effects of litigation are, in a sense, the cost of doing business."
A free speech organization sent a letter to the police department last week, calling its anti–hate speech post unconstitutional.
Did he make a true threat? Or was this just hyperbolic ranting about bad policy?
The court rejects the argument that the prosecution should be dismissed on the grounds that it's "vindictive."
New details emerge regarding the Trump administration's surveillance dragnet cracking down on its online critics.
A new Hawaii law reclassifies corporate political speech as a "power" the state can revoke at will.
Dissent: "We judges can write all we want, but this public voted with its eyeballs."
The Senate’s funding bill stops the Trump administration from handing political appointees control over federal grants, but Congress isn’t eager to rein in spending.
The law is written so broadly it could punish services that let you fake an image of yourself in a swimsuit.
UPDATE: Though this opinion was handed down just two weeks ago, it turns out to be a slightly revised version of an opinion from July 2022; my apologies for not noticing this at the outset.
"Suing individuals because they have a homeowner's insurance policy or are collectible defendants is not a proper purpose for a lawsuit."
Oklahoma's highest criminal court reverses a 3-year sentence for "posting a video rant about [defendant's] ex-wife."
Trump opposes foreign influence in American politics, but his State Department is offering millions of dollars to promote Western identity and opposition to “mass migration” abroad.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.