Journal of Free Speech Law: "Sober and Self-Guided Newsgathering," by Prof. Jane Bambauer
Just published as part of the symposium on Media and Society After Technological Disruption, edited by Profs. Justin "Gus" Hurwitz & Kyle Langvardt.
Just published as part of the symposium on Media and Society After Technological Disruption, edited by Profs. Justin "Gus" Hurwitz & Kyle Langvardt.
Properly crafted restrictions on displays of pornographic material where minors can see it are constitutional; but the court rules, among other things, that this restriction (1) discriminatorily targets drag shows, (2) lacks an exemption for minors escorted by parents, (3) applies even to venues that try to card attendees but are duped by a fake ID.
"We find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech."
Just published as part of the symposium on Media and Society After Technological Disruption, edited by Profs. Justin "Gus" Hurwitz & Kyle Langvardt.
The symposium was edited by Prof. Justin "Gus Hurwitz" & Prof. Kyle Langvardt, and will be published later this year as a book by Cambridge University Press.
The court had allowed her to litigate pseudonymously at earlier stages in the process, but just held that this doesn’t extend to trial.
The show's final season boldly declared that success requires putting yourself first and accepting the trade-offs.
The case had involved a doctor who had sued over his license being restricted based on allegations of mental incompetency.
The Missouri senator is once again pursuing misguided tech regulation.
Plus: Debt ceiling deal passes House, Congress wants to childproof the internet, lactation consultant licensing law is unconstitutional, and more...
The CEO of Open To Debate wants us to disagree more productively—especially when it comes to presidential debates.
How online “child protection” measures could make child and adult internet users more vulnerable to hackers, identity thieves, and snoops.
Whether the putative target is the "biomedical security state," wokeness, "Big Tech censors," or Chinese Communists, the presidential candidate’s grandstanding poses a clear threat to individual rights.
Laws against displaying Nazi-esque iconography are well-intended, but they pose a threat to free speech and the principles of a free society.
Freedom's Dominion argues Southern history was animated by "racialized radical anti-statism." The case is lacking.
Expect the very foundations of the internet to come under attack from politicians and the mainstream media.
The New York Times asked that their names, and information related to the bail hearing, be released.
"[W]e find no error by the trial court in finding that Father had mentally abused N. The circuit court concluded that N. was 'frightened,' 'scared,' and 'fearful' of his Father's anger and his Father's refusal to accept his sexual orientation."
A new report calls for policy makers to take action when none is required.
A case stemming from a "Holocaust revisionist's" expulsion from a conference on "Mennonites and the Holocaust."
violates the First Amendment, holds the Louisiana Court of Appeal.
The student had “posted a screenshot of a friend with a cosmetic mud mask on her face with the caption ‘when he says he’s only into black girls’ on her Instagram account.”
Plus: A new lawsuit in Montana over the state's TikTok ban, the economic realities of online content creation, the rights of private companies, and more...
Plus: Americans are increasingly changing religions, court pauses rejection of "free" preventative care mandate, and more...
Anger about social media censorship should be directed at repressive governments, not the companies they threaten.
Democrats spent tens of millions of dollars last year's midterms meddling in Republican primaries. Republicans may now be borrowing a page from their playbook.
Why the businessman launched a long shot campaign for the presidency.
A demand letter states that the Uvalde school district is infringing on Adam Martinez's First Amendment right to criticize the government.
He either doesn't understand or won't admit why this violates the First Amendment.