Man Pleads Guilty to Driving Car at "Stop Asian Hate" Demonstrators
The plea agreement recommends that he receive probation.
The plea agreement recommends that he receive probation.
even though the First Amendment doesn't itself provide such protection.
Idaho's Attorney General Raúl Labrador so opines, including a rousing defense of academic freedom, including in scholarship and teaching.
The Supreme Court considers whether and when banishing irksome constituents violates the First Amendment.
The controversy is similar to part of the controversy in Murthy v. Missouri (formerly Missouri v. Biden), which also involves allegations of government coercion aimed at interfering with speech.
Commercial speech enjoys First Amendment protections, whether politicians like it or not.
Hustler Magazine v Falwell comes to small town politics.
and a much more common rejection of plaintiff-side pseudonymity.
Q&A with the author of the book Elon Musk calls "an excellent explanation of why capitalism is not just successful, but morally right."
Joshua Garton spent nearly two weeks in jail for "manufacturing and disseminating a harassing photograph on social media." A First Amendment lawsuit quickly followed.
Passes are parabolas, "you've got to be a sorry mofo to steal from the lowest of the low" was hyperbole.
Whether Florida may order universities to derecognize Students for Justice in Palestine chapters would likely turn on whether there's evidence on sufficient coordination between them and the national SJP, and the national SJP and Hamas.
"Appellant wants the option to hide behind a shield of anonymity in the event he is unsuccessful in proving his claim, but he would surely identify himself if he were to prove his claims."
"While instructors enjoy considerable freedom and all individuals, when acting as private citizens, enjoy free speech rights, University policy does impose limits on using the classroom or one's course for purposes of political advocacy."
Repeatedly saying so isn't harassment under Florida law, court says.
“We've taught young people that any of their missteps or any of their heterodox opinions are grounds to tear them down. That's no way to grow up.”
“We've taught young people that any of their missteps or any of their heterodox opinions are grounds to tear them down. That's no way to grow up.”
Rikki Schlott and Greg Lukianoff discuss their new book, The Canceling of the American Mind.
Democrats and Republicans are united in thinking their political agendas trump the First Amendment.
Their proposal raises obvious free speech concerns.
Aside from narrowly defined exceptions, false speech is protected by the First Amendment.
The justices agreed to consider whether the Biden administration's efforts to suppress online "misinformation" were unconstitutional.
Douglass Mackey's case raised questions about free speech, overcriminalization, and a politicized criminal legal system.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression responds.
Even content creators outside of New York would feel its effects.
We'll give you an answer within 14 days, and we can publish them within several weeks, if you'd like.
A judge tossed two of the claims against Afroman, finding that "the issue appears to be the humiliation and outrage that the officers feel at having their likenesses displayed and mocked."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10