What 'Rights' Do We Have When We're Talking About Our Private Online Data?
Defining terms is tricky, particularly when governments with bad track records on privacy want to call the shots.
Defining terms is tricky, particularly when governments with bad track records on privacy want to call the shots.
The Reason Roundtable analyzes an establishment smear against a foreign policy heretic, and laments the bipartisan panic against online speech.
"Antifa and the Far Right," he adds, are "good for nothing."
For once, the Trump administration is on the right side of a debate with Congress over trade.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal would give journalists special federal protections that they don't need.
James called Trump a "bum," but he won't utter a single bad word about China's authoritarianism.
"University of Louisville [current and former] students ... asserted a claim that the publication of Katina Powell's book Breaking Cardinal Rules: Basketball and the Escort Queen resulted in a tortious diminution in the value of their University of Louisville education."
Nah, the senator's still wrong about Internet free speech, argue the editors on the Reason Roundtable podcast.
But they might be mad at mom for writing about them in The New York Times.
Plus: Trump murder meme makes waves, California requires abortion pill at public universities, and more...
Are parents liable for defamation by their minor children?
"Mumbai’s cyber police department seeks to remove content [containing obviously PhotoShopped images of Prime Minister Narendra Modi] hosted on this [Northern Ireland] blog, BuzzFeed, Google Blogger, Amazon CloudFront, Tumblr, and Flickr."
As always, the best answer to bad speech is more speech, not censorship.
This week's demonstrations at NBA games are a refreshing reminder that Americans won't just "stick to sports."
"The logical conclusion of Plaintiff's argument is that whenever someone sues for defamation because of potentially embarrassing comments, the plaintiff should be allowed to sue anonymously and with the case under seal."
The gaming company suspended Chung Ng Wai for a year and confiscated his prize money after he said "Liberate Hong Kong."
Apparently the NBA's kow-towing to Communist China is not limited to groveling press statements.
A Maine court said this would violate the private investigator's First Amendment rights, even if the police concluded the statements were false, unless they were also found to have been knowingly or recklessly false -- but should even a finding of knowing falsehood be enough?
The Court of Appeals concluded, I think correctly, that the statute went beyond punishable threats of violence, and beyond punishable blackmail, to cover constitutionally protected demands.
Reason editors discuss vaping deaths, the impeachment inquiry, and the resurgent conservative war on porn.
"You gotta lower your ideals of freedom if you want to suck on the warm teat of China."
The 2018 Uniform Crime Report contained bad news for pessimists but good news for everybody else.
"We are confident that all members of the university community will demonstrate the highest ideals of our university."
Plus: Why you think all your friends get their news on Facebook, the trade-offs that come with higher minimum wages, a modest proposal for AOC, and more...
Is there room for the entire world on this slippery slope?
Although San Francisco's supervisors urged city officials to punish contractors with ties to this "domestic terrorist organization," they say they did not really mean it.
If people think cancel culture sucks now, just wait until the government gets involved.
"Go try to be funny nowadays with this woke culture."
The Commission on Human Rights is likely running afoul of the First Amendment.
So holds a federal district judge, rejecting the defendant's motion to dismiss (though of course without resolving, at this early stage in the lawsuit, who is telling the truth).
It's apparently happening in Tennessee -- but it's clearly unconstitutional.
Under Chinese authoritarianism, they'll have neither.
religious organizations' right to discriminate in some employment decisions, and federal funding conditions preferring local agencies that help federal immigration enforcement.
The case vividly illustrates how hate crime laws punish people for the views they express.
In a new book, Peter Boghossian, one of the perpetrators of the "grievance studies" hoax, outlines how ideological opponents can reach common ground.
The company's Chinese ownership may have something to do with it.
When online privacy faces off against portability
A Texas judge issued the temporary restraining order before any trial on the merits, and apparently without the ex-girlfriend even showing up -- and it seems inconsistent with Texas law and likely the First Amendment/
Supervisor Shamann Walton thinks he can use restrictions on commercial speech to suppress political speech.
An attempt to seal a key document in a libel / breach of contract case filed by a former communication strategist for Julian Assange against a former lawyer for Edward Snowden.
That's what flyers posted in Winchester (Massachusetts) say.
A new book tries and fails to make a case against freedom of expression.
It took a jury 26 minutes to decide that Jonathan Vanderhagen wasn't guilty.
The populist senator's campaign against social media addiction is unscientific and anti-freedom.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.