Trump Campaign Sues TV Station for Running 'Defamatory' Coronavirus Attack Ad
The lawsuit is the latest in a string of frivolous suits the president's reelection campaign has filed against media outlets.
The lawsuit is the latest in a string of frivolous suits the president's reelection campaign has filed against media outlets.
Plus: Judge rejects Gabbard's Google lawsuit, Bloomberg drops out, and more...
Plus: Maybe Buttigieg didn't win Iowa? Vermont considers decriminalizing prostitution. Customs and Border Protection gets a status change. And more...
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is filing a defamation suit against Hillary Clinton
The lawsuit might be good politics, but it's bad for free speech.
By complaining to Yale about Bandy Lee's violation of the Goldwater Rule, Dershowitz lets her portray herself as a brave dissident.
Justice Alito dissents from the denial of certiorari in National Review v. Mann
"Your statement is defamatory, and we demand that you retract it immediately," Gabbard's lawyer wrote in a letter.
The former vice presidential candidate's revived defamation suit against The New York Times highlights the hazards of us-versus-them thinking.
While the teenager has a legitimate beef about coverage of his encounter with Native American activist Nathan Phillips, that doesn't mean he has a legal cause of action.
Nicole Prause and Donald Hilton, longtime opponents on the subject of pornography, are now facing off in court.
A local bakery accused the college of defamation after students launched a public campaign against the store for racial profiling. Oberlin mounted a free speech defense.
An allegedly bogus dossier on plaintiff was sent by defendant to a third party in 2003 -- and then hit the news in 2017. Can plaintiff sue for libel?
Thomas thinks the Supreme Court may have erred in its 1964 NYT v. Sullivan ruling.
The Supreme Court, though, has suggested that such laws, if narrow enough, are constitutional.
Arkansas Supreme Court Justice Courtney Goodson was trying to block ads that criticized her and allegedly defamed her.
The president, who routinely threatens to sue people for saying things he does not like, deployed an anti-SLAPP law in his own defense.
The op-ed's claims are harsh, but they're also true.
The New Jersey Supreme Court answers.
After an initial hearing, Stanford's Mark Jacobson thinks better of pursuing a scientific disagreement in court.
When it comes to "opening up" the First Amendment, the president's bark is worse than his bite.
"In our case, he stepped on the wrong people's constitutional rights because we knew our rights."
The ruling shows how carelessly the paper peddled nonsense about Republican rhetoric and mass murder.
'Trump hasn't even taken office and it's already becoming easier to sue people for defamation.'
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks