Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Department of Justice

Bye-Bye, Bondi 

Plus: pro-tech media sells to big tech, Trump's new tariffs, jobs numbers, and more...

Peter Suderman | 4.3.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Attorney General Pam Bondi | Photo: Pam Bondi, February 27, 2022; Joe Marino/UPI/Alamy Live News
(Photo: Pam Bondi, February 27, 2022; Joe Marino/UPI/Alamy Live News)

Bondi out. Yesterday, after months of private complaints and rumors of tension, President Donald Trump ousted Attorney General Pam Bondi, saying that she will be taking a job in the private sector. It's not clear what the new job will be. Bondi's deputy, former Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, will take over the Justice Department in an acting capacity. Environmental Protection Agency chief Lee Zeldin is reportedly being looked at as a possible replacement. 

The most straightforward way to understand Bondi's departure is to return to an unusual Truth Social post by Trump from September of last year. The post, directed to "Pam," was reportedly intended as a private direct message, and it gives an idea of what Trump was thinking and saying behind the scenes. The post urged the then-A.G. to move more quickly to prosecute Trump's political enemies, including Sen. Adam Schiff (D–Calif.) and New York Attorney General Letitia James. "We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and credibility," Trump wrote. "They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!" 

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Bondi used Justice Department muscle to pursue investigations into Trump's enemies, but it wasn't enough for Trump. As Politico notes, "Trump's second term has been marked by an unprecedented assertion of executive power. But that hasn't translated into the cascade of criminal prosecutions Trump has long demanded against his enemies." 

The president saw Bondi as "weak and ineffective," according to The Wall Street Journal, because she hadn't successfully prosecuted his foes. Trump views the Justice Department as a vehicle for his personal grievances; he felt Bondi wasn't aggressive enough in driving that vehicle. 

As Reason's Joe Lancaster wrote yesterday, Bondi's handling of the Epstein files was also a factor.  

But even if you set aside her efforts to pursue Trump's personal grievance agenda, Bondi was not exactly a champion of American freedom, especially on issues related to speech.

She suggested that it was legal to prosecute an Office Depot employee for declining to print flyers for a Charlie Kirk memorial vigil. She made utterly bogus claims about hate speech. She once suggested that "domestic terrorists" could be characterized in part by "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment." 

Bondi was simply unmoored from any sort of coherent constitutional view of freedom of expression. That's worrying for any law enforcement official, and especially dangerous when that person is the attorney general. Federal officials should be in the business of protecting American rights and freedoms, not misconstruing them. 

Tariff man. Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of what Trump once referred to as "Liberation Day"—the start of his sweeping, and often shifting, tariff regime. The initial justification for those tariffs was struck down by the Supreme Court, but Trump has plowed forward with new (also dubious) legal arguments—and new tariffs. 

Yesterday, he announced that he would place tariffs up to 100 percent on some brand-name drugs, and would make further adjustments to existing tariffs on steel and aluminum. These are the first significant changes to Trump's tariff regime since the Supreme Court ruling in February. 

The details are somewhat complicated. As The Wall Street Journal reports, "the consequences of the tariff changes will vary widely depending on the product." It's an understatement to say that the words "consequences" and "will vary widely" are not exactly what businesses want to hear right now. 

It is worth reiterating that the sheer confusing complexity, combined with the uncertainty of constantly shifting policies, of these tariffs has been a big part of what has made these levies so costly and burdensome. When tariff policy changes repeatedly and without warning, it's very difficult for businesses to plan.

Higher costs get passed off to consumers, and trade pipelines slow down or break down. America is deeply enmeshed in the global economy; Trump's trade policies have mostly served to gum up the works. 

Tech bro$. Tech industry-focused podcast TBPN sold to OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, for an undisclosed sum. The Financial Times reports the sale was in the "low hundreds of millions." Reports say the deal allows TBPN to maintain full editorial independence. 

The podcast, which began in 2024, broadcasts live for three hours every weekday. It has a relatively modest audience but has become influential inside the world of frontier, big-money tech, in part because it's perceived as more friendly to new tech and business building than other tech-focused outlets. 

It's boosterish at times, but it's also fun, informative, and most importantly, optimistic—not just about tech, but about business and capitalism more generally. 

I'm a casual fan and admirer of the show, and it's pretty clearly a response to the militantly anti-tech, anti-business attitude that so many tech-and-business-focused publications have taken over the last 15 years or so.

The show's core premise is: What if we covered technology—but didn't utterly loathe technology and everyone who makes it? Sounds crazy, but it works. 


Scenes from Washington, D.C.: In January, a D.C.-area sewer line failed, resulting in a massive spill of untreated wastewater into the Potomac. D.C. Water, the utility responsible for the pipe, had previously noticed corrosion and applied to fix the sewer line.

But a Washington Post investigation finds that the project was delayed multiple times "as federal officials studied potential environmental impacts, including risks to a blue wildflower and an endangered bat species." In short, a prolonged and politicized environmental review process made it impossible to prevent an environmental disaster.


QUICK HITS

  • In March, U.S. employers added 178,000 jobs, according to this morning's jobs report. The unemployment rate ticked down to 4.3 percent. It's a strong result for an economy that has recently struggled with hiring. 
  • The White House wants $1.5 trillion for defense spending. If approved, according to The New York Times, that would be the highest amount in modern history.
  • Roughly a quarter of Americans are so-called "double haters" who view both parties poorly. But when it comes time to vote, many of those haters still end up making a choice. A new CNN poll finds that "voters in that group prefer the Democrats in the upcoming midterms by 31 points."
  • Is big tech shifting from software to hardware?
  • Trump is reportedly frustrated with other members of his cabinet, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. 
  • A planning commission approved Trump's White House ballroom plans, but there are still legal hurdles following this week's judicial ruling that Congress must approve further construction. Also, the ballroom apparently sits atop a giant military bunker. 
  • Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth fired the Army's top general, along with two others.
  • The photos coming out of the Artemis II space mission are pretty incredible.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Republican Plan To Nationalize Elections Is Performative Nonsense

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

Department of JusticeTrump AdministrationAttorney GeneralDonald TrumpEnvironmentalismMediaTechnologyTariffsPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (169)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Yesterday, after months of private complaints and rumors of tension, President Donald Trump ousted Attorney General Pam Bondi, saying that she will be taking a job in the private sector.

    Does he even say his signature catchphrase anymore?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   3 months ago

      More importantly, will a judge give her the job back?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        I think that's reserved for those not hired by Trump.

    2. mad.casual   3 months ago

      I'm 50/50 on whether we get an exposè from Reason about how Trump's use of a "You're Fired!" button is the same as an autopen.

    3. Vernon Depner   3 months ago

      She'll be dealing blackjack at Marilago.

  2. Idaho-Bob   3 months ago

    As Politico notes,

    Quoting Politico is just another new low

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

      But they have sources familiar with the matter. Makes it true. Just dont read below.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

      Along with "...according to The New York Times,..."

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

      It’s still better than “as Reason’s Autumn Billings notes”. They’ve done that too.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    The post, directed to "Pam," was reportedly intended as a private direct message...

    Private because Trump is known for being coy and demure.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

      Don't forget subtle.

    2. Bubba Jones   3 months ago

      I like the idea that he's using TRUTH SOCIAL to manage his cabinet members.

      Totally secure.

      lol.

  4. Idaho-Bob   3 months ago

    In March, U.S. employers added 178,000 jobs,

    Reason told me just a few days ago, the economy was doomed. DOOMED!!!!!

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

      Not one job was found when a single wine bottle was tracked. Eric wins again.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

      And that Trump never fires anyone loyal to him!

  5. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    Politico had an article with 6 sources familiar with the prepared trump speech, common these days. Turns out the 6 sources familiar were wrong. Also common these days. Wh mocks them.

    https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/wh-blasts-politico-preview-trump-speech-example-why-americans-should-not

    1. Idaho-Bob   3 months ago

      Sarc Manchu will be along soon to dispute Leavitt's commentary because reasons.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    ...the cascade of criminal prosecutions Trump has long demanded against his enemies.

    If only we had a clue where he learned those tactics.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

      Hitler?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

      This framing is completely disingenuous. Claiming they are simply 'enemies' glosses over all their wrong doing. But we all know it is (D)ifferent when it is done by the Dems.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   3 months ago

        If there is no accountability for what they did to Trump before/during/after his first term, he will spend the rest of his life in a courtroom and or prison.

        The question is does Reason not understand that, or are they ok with it?

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

          They are okay with it. They cheered on every attempt by Garland and ither dem AGs outside the property valuation case. The latter solely because NYT was against it.

        2. Social Justice is neither   3 months ago

          More than OK with it, it's their preferred outcome. Democracy is when Democrats win by any means necessary and Reason is 1000% on board even if they frame it as reluctantly ant strategically (and consistently).

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

            Perhaps much of the Reason staff should be in prison.

    3. Moonrocks   3 months ago

      What happened to nobody's above the law? Is that just a forgotten relic of the bygone era that was 2024?

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 months ago

        The same thing that happened to #MeToo in 2020 when Brandon was accused of assault.

        No longer useful.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

          To be fair, it was "believe all women" that went out the window then.

  7. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    Act Blue seems to finally be in trouble. Even NYT has to write about how Act blues own lawyers think Act blue lied to congress and accepted fraudulent donstions.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/us/politics/actblue-democrat-fundraising-foreign-donations.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

    1. Ajsloss   3 months ago

      And then nothing happened?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

        Something may happen this time! They gave the NYT the go ahead to write about it!

      2. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

        A few high-level rats have fled the ship.

    2. Not an Economist   3 months ago

      According to ActBlue, the people in that article, including ActBlue's lawyers, are lying.

    3. mad.casual   3 months ago

      Well, yeah, they accepted all that money from a bunch of transgendered, right-wing, Republican school shooters.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    She suggested that it was legal to prosecute an Office Depot employee for declining to print flyers for a Charlie Kirk memorial vigil.

    "Just bake the damn cake."

    Honestly, she was the worst AG since the previous one.

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   3 months ago

      The time-line where Garland was appointed to SCOTUS is the one that all the time travellers came back to prevent.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        Never a chance. The Supreme Court is populated solely by the greatest legal minds in the country.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

      Glad I checked...came to say "Just bake the fucking cake!" myself.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        Thanks for not having me on mute.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        Buy that precedent, ENB can be prosecuted for not making the fucking sandwich.

  9. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    After 11 years, the legal take down of the journalist who exposed Planned Parenthood selling aborted fetus parts is over.


    David Daleiden

    @daviddaleiden
    As promised, the final charge has been DISMISSED and the case completely expunged—

    —after a couple months' administrative delay, and a truly bizarre last-minute "April Fool's" attempt by
    @PPFA
    and
    @NatAbortionFed
    to overturn the State's agreement.

    A case coordinated between Kamala and PP fully on political grounds. A case reason all but ignored. 11 years of political prosecution.

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   3 months ago

      Persecution by prosecution. The process is the punishment.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

        Due process?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

          And THEN some!

    2. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

      Kamala didn't have to fire the AG for not going after her enimies.

    3. mad.casual   3 months ago

      11 years of political prosecution.

      11 yrs. of political prosecution in a case of 'Selling baby parts v. Free Speech'. But we got 30 fucking articles defending Priscilla Villarreal for using her police contact to dox dead people.

      And they (don't) wonder why the media is less popular than pretty much any section of politics and/or the government you want to slice.

  10. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    Bulwark goes Molly+10.

    https://www.thebulwark.com/p/america-lost-iran-won-trump-shat?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

    1. Idaho-Bob   3 months ago

      It is true, as the president said last night, that the Iranian navy and air force have been almost eliminated.

      But we lost. And America is a "hockey country".

      The Bulwark seems to be cheering the genocidal Islamists.

      1. Michael Ejercito   3 months ago

        I wonder why.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

      More treason and sedition.

  11. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    Best meme of the KBJ jurisprudence from the birthright case.

    https://x.com/Shanghaibeast/status/2039576552330183086

    1. Ajsloss   3 months ago

      Look at me. Look at me! I am the shogun now.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

      https://babylonbee.com/news/in-compelling-argument-for-birthright-citizenship-justice-jackson-eats-entire-stick-of-glue

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

      KBJ is the first Idiocracy SC Justice.

      1. mad.casual   3 months ago

        This one is to the point that I'm almost dubious.

        "I'm not a biologist." vs. "So, what you're saying is, if you get arrested by someone with a penis, that makes you a man?"

        She may not be a biologist, but she is a lawyer. She knows what a deposition is. If she doesn't know about birth certificates, a historic, first Black former President should pick up the phone and give her a call.

        Not abject stupidity, rehearsed stupidity like a Manchurian Candidate to, rather than assassinate a head of state, poison collective intelligence/AIs.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

          It like she’s a female black version of Benny Stulwicz that got DEI hires and promotions that went way too far.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Yesterday, he announced that he would place tariffs up to 100 percent on some brand-name drugs, and would make further adjustments to existing tariffs on steel and aluminum.

    He's in danger of beginning to maybe tax the benefit of the doubt I'm giving him on tariffs.

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   3 months ago

      I am not a fan of tariffs. But as the rest of the world is finding out right now about oil, some industries are, in fact, vital to national security and require protection. We will need US steel and aluminum production to survive what is coming.

      Sure, we can get to the moon, but the enemy is already within our borders.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        Yes, many democrats are within our borders.

  13. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    Colorado bans lawyers who work with federal immigration authorities feom state legal system under penalty. This seems illegal.

    Ian Speir
    @IanSpeir
    Colorado is now requiring lawyers in the State, as a condition of logging into its court e-filing system, to promise not to cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing federal immigration law.

    Please understand:
    - I do not practice immigration law.
    - I do not practice criminal law.
    - Nothing about my civil practice has anything to do with this.

    And yet because I cannot log into the State's official e-filing system without saluting The Resistance, I now cannot represent my clients, file lawsuits, access cases, file documents in existing cases, etc.

    If I click "Decline," it kicks me out of the system. I must click "Accept" to access the system and continue representing my civil clients -- again, in cases that have absolutely nothing to do with immigration law or policy.

    I've read SB 25-276 (the law referred to below). It does not regulate me as a private attorney or any of the clients I represent in civil matters. This is outrageous draconian overreach.

    I have ethical obligations to my clients to represent them competently. My existing cases have running deadlines that I must attend to. Judges issue orders in my cases that I must follow. If I don't click "Accept" in order to access the State's e-filing system, I will harm my clients, torpedo my practice, and probably commit malpractice. So, I have no choice.

    I'm clicking "Accept" under protest.

    https://x.com/IanSpeir/status/2039724650150994362

    1. BYODB   3 months ago

      Colorado is absolutely nuts, and they've put every lawyer in the state into a strange bind where they have to promise not to follow the law in order to be allowed to be a lawyer.

      That's...some fine reasoning there Colorado. Way to put every lawyer in the state into Federal crosshairs for obstruction of justice.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

        After 10 years in Colorado, and seeing the increasing shit that Democrats dump on us, I have to get out of here.

      2. Michael Ejercito   3 months ago

        How did they become so nuts?

        This never happened under Richard Lamm nor Roy Romer.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   3 months ago

          A bunch of leftists moved there from California.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

            And Austin.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

          First to legalize pot. Brought the liberals in droves.

        3. BYODB   3 months ago

          It's because Denver wags the entire state with population and a bunch of idiot kids of successful rich business types choose to live in the Denver area since it's largely a vacation state. There are entire towns run by people who don't really live there, after all, but those are the super rich.

          Legal pot may have been partially to blame too, but pot isn't new to the state either. If we're going down that road, you might as well blame John Denver hippies that moved here...which now that I think about it is pretty much what happened to Boulder. Hmm...

    2. Idaho-Bob   3 months ago

      This is a tactic to pursue a possible perjury charge in the future.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

      Ian Speir should get a lawyer to file suit against the State.

    4. Social Justice is neither   3 months ago

      Sounds like a situation for no knock raids on every signatory of that law, the system administrator and every person who facilitated this sedition and act of secession.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Tech industry-focused podcast TBPN sold to OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, for an undisclosed sum.

    What kind of weird money laundering shit is going on here?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

      Ask chatGPT.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        Skynet is why I can't afford to buy server memory at work. I ain't asking it dick.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

          Feel the pain. Memory pruces have doubled for us too, especially for HPCs. The the Nvidia cards are all going to 4 bit/16 bit. We need double precision for a lot of shit so emulating those calculations.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

            How long will it take memory chip manufacturing to catch up?

        2. mad.casual   3 months ago

          +1 for simultaneous cogency and future-history "Old Man Yells At Cloud"/"They only had yellow onions on account of the war."

          Have you considered trans-dental electromicide?

  15. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    Hospice fraud prosecutions in California have started.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/04/fbi-raids-home-of-california-couple-accused-of-7-million-hospice-fraud/

    1. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

      Slaps on the wrist incoming!

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        Indexed based on skin color, Islamic status, and if the defendant is a Party member in good standing.

        White Christian male republican: 50 years, no parole

        Arab Muslim Hamas member and democrat donor: Case dismissed

  16. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    (((Harry Enten)))
    @ForecasterEnten
    Congressional Dems' numbers with Dems are atrociously awful. (Even worse among all voters.)

    Most Dems (55%) think their party has the wrong priorities!

    Unlike 2006 or 2018, Dem leaders have a negative net approval with Dems!

    Schumer is on thin ice to hold his job next year.

    https://x.com/ForecasterEnten/status/2039725975760470049

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

      "Most Dems (55%) think their party has the wrong priorities!"

      Not insanely progressive enough?

      1. Super Scary   3 months ago

        That's the sentiment I am seeing in some parts of the internet; the current democrat party is too moderate for them. Shooting political figures and promising lawfare as soon as they have any amount of power at all isn't enough for that 55%.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

          You should see the Seattle Reddit. A more wretched hive of scum and villainy I’ve never seen. One of the Marxists posted a picture of an electronic sign showing $15 toll road/bridge fares. The Marxist was whining about it. I pointed it that this comes from the people he voted for, so it was his own fault.

          Within an hour I had over a hundred downvotes with angry threatening replies. These people have absolutely no self awareness.

  17. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

    RNC Research

    @RNCResearch
    Democrat Rep. Shomari Figures tries to fearmonger about voter ID and it backfires

    FIGURES: “How many people in here do not have ID?”

    *no one raises their hands*

    FIGURES: “Everybody has ID…so I thought something a little bit different…”

    https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/2039354337244139844

    1. mad.casual   3 months ago

      I like the "I'm from a different generation." like even 50 yrs. ago, 20 yrs. after "The Little Rock 9", 10 yrs. after MLK's assassination, it still made sense to say "Lots of black people sign their name with an 'X'." like a bunch of old toothless '49ers.

      Edit: FFS, Thomas has been on the bench for 35 yrs.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

      The guy is a bigoted racist.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    In short, a prolonged and politicized environmental review process made it impossible to prevent an environmental disaster.

    The nation's capital drown in the literal shit that it metaphorically wallows in.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

      That's not quite right but whatever.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

        We still appreciate your scat.

    2. Social Justice is neither   3 months ago

      So now they're finding out that their shit does in fact stink.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        Let that fact stink in.

  19. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   3 months ago

    Suderman is what raging TDS looks like. Liz and Robbie are the only staffers who are even moderately capable of controlling their biases.

    I just come here because I can still post and the commentariat is interesting.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

      They’re killing the commentariat too. Volume is way, way down in recent months. Although we have shaken off some of the leftist filth, and the Neo Nazi.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    The White House wants $1.5 trillion for defense spending. If approved, according to The New York Times, that would be the highest amount in modern history.

    Federal spending figures have lost all meaning because that sum doesn't sound like the highest.

    1. BYODB   3 months ago

      The reader is left to wonder if that's inflation adjusted 'highest amount in modern history' or if it's just that the dollar has lost that much value.

    2. Vernon Depner   3 months ago

      When numbers get that big, they're just pretend.

      https://youtu.be/CPDr9wGNEfg?si=kcujN6hWymQ5kHam&t=266

      1. Zeb   3 months ago

        Just ask for $1 zillion and be done with it.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        Like the Alex Jones judgement?

    3. Social Justice is neither   3 months ago

      Also, is it that high because it includes requests that normally they would bring forward separately?

  21. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Roughly a quarter of Americans are so-called "double haters" who view both parties poorly. But when it comes time to vote, many of those haters still end up making a choice.

    Duh. You vote against the side you hate more.

    1. Ajsloss   3 months ago

      Well, I believe I'll vote for a third party candidate!

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        I routinely hate them the most, largely for their ineffectuality.

        1. Ajsloss   3 months ago

          largely for their ineffectuality

          Come on, we know the real reason you didn't vote for Chase.

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   3 months ago

            I heard he was gay.

            1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

              WHO TOLD YOU THAT I WAS GAY

              1. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

                Lol

          2. Vernon Depner   3 months ago

            At what age should you tell your child that he's gay?

        2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   3 months ago

          You just hate them because they're gay! And don't know what a leppo is.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    It's a strong result for an economy that has recently struggled with hiring.

    PRESIDENT TRUMP ACCEPTS YOUR APOLOGY

  23. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Trump is reportedly frustrated with other members of his cabinet, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

    Taking a cabinet position in general must be so lucrative as to override the downside of working for Trump.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

      But we've been told loyalty is all that matters. Was the narrative wrong??

  24. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Also, the ballroom apparently sits atop a giant military bunker.

    You know who else...?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

      Some guy with room for only one ball?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

        Awww.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth fired the Army's top general, along with two others.

    Did they refuse the jab?

    1. Social Justice is neither   3 months ago

      He misheard somebody say they were a drag.

      1. mad.casual   3 months ago

        3 Generals, all tops. DADT.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

          His akita approves.

  26. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

    The photos coming out of the Artemis II space mission are pretty incredible.

    NASA ACCEPTS YOUR APOLOGY

    1. Fist of Etiquette   3 months ago

      I wonder how many Muslims have gone un-outreached-to because of this loss of NASA focus.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

        And Peruvian trans-gender opera companies.

      2. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

        Allah lives on the moon. Greatest. Muslim. Outreach. Ever.

        NASA had to us a rocket. All the winged horses where occupied.

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

    'The most straightforward way to understand Bondi's departure is to return to an unusual Truth Social post by Trump from September of last year.'

    And what is the most straightforward way to understand Reason's interpretation of Bondi's departure? Or their treatment of anything Trump does?

    1. MasterThief   3 months ago

      Bondi has been inept and her communication was atrocious. Teen Reason focuses on some childish loyalty narrative and a social media post that highlights the already obvious point that she butchered key tasks.

    2. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

      It was the best evidence that fit their preferred narrative.

  28. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

    'Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of what Trump once referred to as "Liberation Day"—the start of his sweeping, and often shifting, tariff regime.'

    And yesterday was also an orgy of Reason ranting about tariffs. I guess the orgy is not over.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

      We are all lucky to have surived the tariff apocolypse.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 months ago

        I can't even afford silk ties anymore.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

          Jeffy and Shrike can barely afford to have little brown boys trafficked to their homes by South American cartels anymore. Amd Jeffy might have to cut his monthly delivery of 55 gallon fed drums of ice cream by a barrel. Tariffs are really hitting them hard.

  29. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

    'The show's core premise is: What if we covered technology—but didn't utterly loathe technology and everyone who makes it? Sounds crazy, but it works.'

    Hmm, what if a website covered liberty and libertarianism, but didn't loathe liberty and everyone who promotes it? Would that be crazy?

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   3 months ago

      Heh. TDS means never having to self-reflect.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        A lack of self reflection is a cornerstone of being a democrat.

    2. mad.casual   3 months ago

      but didn't utterly loathe technology and everyone who makes it

      I mean, where else in this market are you going to get your arms-length, tech-optimist takes?

      Sounds less like any sort of real news or tech media source and more like a yes-man hallucination to sell to tech billionaires, like MSNBC, CNN+, or The Washington Post.

  30. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   3 months ago

    Now that the artimis 2 has launched, we have 8 days to get every one on earth a planet of the apes costume and pull off the greatest prank ever

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 months ago

      Love it. I volunteer to be caged with Nova.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        Yes it would give you something to do in the cage. Her.

      2. Ersatz   3 months ago

        My personal favorite part of the movie

  31. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 months ago

    'Roughly a quarter of Americans are so-called "double haters" who view both parties poorly. But when it comes time to vote, many of those haters still end up making a choice. A new CNN poll finds that "voters in that group prefer the Democrats in the upcoming midterms by 31 points."'

    No confusion. How many double haters hate the Democratic Party because it is not progressive enough?

    1. MasterThief   3 months ago

      I hate the Republicans because they don't represent their conservative constituents and allow Democrats to drive the agenda regardless of the congressional make up

  32. Spiritus Mundi   3 months ago

    Dear morons at Reeeeason, read a book sometime.

  33. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

    WSJ:

    U.S. Hiring Defied Expectations With 178,000 New Jobs
    U.S. job growth blew past expectations last month

  34. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

    So many illegals dropped out of school...enrollments are way down and funding is plummeting.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ice-raids-caused-enrollment-to-drop-now-districts-are-paying-the-price/ar-AA1ZZxyV

    Community members packed a high school auditorium in Chelsea, Massachusetts, last month to oppose the school board’s plan to cut 70 positions, including reading coaches, special education staff and counselors.

    The layoffs will help reduce an $8.6 million budget deficit, due in part to the loss of 350 students.

    Sarah Neville, a board member in the Boston-area district, knows one reason enrollment is down. Under federal law, districts can’t ask whether students are U.S. citizens, but almost 90% of the 5,700-students are Latino and 47% are English learners. The state education agency estimates that the population of English learners in Massachusetts schools has dropped by 7,000 since 2024. Officials from Chelsea and other metro-area districts say absenteeism increased as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducted raids in Boston last fall.

    “We’re low hanging fruit for ICE because so many of our folks are undocumented,” Neville said.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

      Gov't schooling; the asswipe can't spell "illegal".

    2. mad.casual   3 months ago

      plan to cut 70 positions, including reading coaches, special education staff and counselors

      So with all the future doctors, scientists, engineers, and tech entrepreneurs just waiting to fuel to our economy like gasoline on a campfire, they weren't overstaffed in math, science, health, and economics teachers?

      Huh.

  35. I, Woodchipper   3 months ago

    I hate both parties. I hate Democrats because they are basically Bolsheviks and I hate Republicans for not fighting them hard enough.

    1. proprietist   3 months ago

      Democrats are not even remotely "Bolsheviks." Even the radical "democratic socialist" Democrats like AOC or Mamdani or Bernie have nothing whatsoever in common with the Bolshevik's vanguardism, "dictatorship of the proletariat" or support for violent revolution against capitalism, and they don't represent the mainstream Democrats who are almost all centrist neoliberal pragmatists.

      Note "centrist" doesn't not mean "in the center between wherever the ruling parties lie" - it means balancing multiple values necessary to building a stable society without radicalism in any one direction.

      Most Democrats are not calling for ending capitalism - in fact, it is just the opposite - they want to save capitalism from its own worst impulses through preventative regulation, progressive taxation, monetary policy and strong safety nets so it does not get eliminated in a democracy due to the unpopularity of child labor, monopolism, environmental destruction, the failure of critical needs being met and wild instability.

      We have witnessed such a capitalism historically and chose the path that has led to stable growth for decades now - a more balanced society with a safety net, striving towards meritocracy.

      Republicans and right-libertarians seem to prefer a more dystopian capitalism, and have done everything they can to fight the very measures keeping voters in a democracy from throwing out capitalism altogether and embracing socialism a century ago.

      This is the paradox of libertarianism and why I no longer consider myself a libertarian: there is no faster route to socialism than embracing plutocracy, oligarchy and de facto government by might-makes-right. Public health care, education and other basic needs that are not met by private markets and in fact run contrary to the incentives of private markets without heavy government subsidization are the salve that keeps people from revolting (either democratically at the polls, or violently if they can't vote.)

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   3 months ago

        ""Most Democrats are not calling for ending capitalism"'

        Almost every democrat I know would disagree.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

          Same. He should really go to DNC convention, or an antifa riot. They might open up his eyes.

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 months ago

        “..,,.they want to save capitalism…..,, through ……regulation…… taxation…….”

        Haha. Good one. I almost thought you were being serious for a second.

      3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

        "...there is no faster route to socialism than embracing plutocracy, oligarchy and de facto government by might-makes-right..."

        Exactly what nearly every D proposes and what you are entirely too stupid to understand.

  36. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

    "Trump calls on 'God Squad' to override endangered animal protections"
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-on-god-squad-to-override-endangered-animal-protections/ar-AA1ZQZYp

    Good. The EPA needs some oversight.

  37. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

    "No Kings Protesters Explained"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBe8XbXK-yw

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   3 months ago

      A king is coming. There will be no protests.

      https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/king-charles-pay-state-visit-us-uk-seeks-mollify-trump-2026-03-31/

  38. proprietist   3 months ago

    Pam Bondi had an impossible job which she performed without honor or competency.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

      She didn’t destroy enough democrats. Or go after any of their judges.

      We need a real wartime AG to battle the democrat party.

  39. Medulla Oblongata   3 months ago

    "The photos coming out of the Artemis II space mission are pretty incredible."

    My FB feed is virtually all flat-earthers and "moon-landing is faked" posts. Good lord, I'm not sure how some of these folks can even manage enough brainpower to breath, let alone post shit on FB.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   3 months ago

      I have a friend that went flat-earther. I said really dude? It's 2025. There is more than ample evidence it is round. The amount of denial they will do to try to keep the flat earth faith is amazing. If the world was flat we would have video evidence of that.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

        How does the idiot explain all the satellites orbiting the globe?

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   3 months ago

          I threw that at him, and he denies them, it's a conspiracy. That's part of the level of denial I referred to.

          It's been a while since I talked to him. Maybe he grew out of it because you have to deny the existence of so many things.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

            That’s next, next level denial. There are currently between 10-12k satellites in orbit. Does he also think Sandy Hook never happened too?

            Also, why does no one ever fall off the edge of the planet? What about magnetic poles? Physics????? Air travel?

            There’s so MUCH that blows up his Luddite theory.

            1. Vernon Depner   3 months ago

              There were in fact bizarre aspects to the Sandy Hook incident.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

                Absolutely. Obama even classified it. But it definitely happened. I know a guy who is fairly intelligent and a private commercial pilot that is convinced it didn’t. Everyone is a crisis actor and in on it, according to him. He won’t listen when I explain that this would require swearing over a thousand people relatively unrelated to each other to secrecy, forever. Which would never work.

                My guess is that Obama had LE lie about the weapons used and some other facts so he could better push for gun control. But I can’t prove that.

                1. Vernon Depner   3 months ago

                  I agree with the gist of what you're saying. The shooting did happen, but there were aspects of it the feds wanted to cover up. The clumsiness of the coverup created strange aspects to the story that were noticed but that could not be explained without revealing the coverup.

                  1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

                    Yep, pretty much.

      2. mad.casual   3 months ago

        Flat-earth always bugged me as to why. The Moon landing and Young Earth at least have some plausibly implausible justifications behind them. Even if you don't believe in an all-powerful God, you could understand that if you believed such a thing existed, fudging the fossil record to keep that specific belief makes sense. We faked the Moon landing as a psyop to one up the Soviets actually isn't that implausible (even if I don't believe it). But flat Earth, what do you lose if the Earth is round? Why all the (impossible) added complexity (from Aristotle and Eratosthene's shadows to GPS and satellite technology) to generate the illusion that the Earth is round? If you had to give it all up in order to "win" the Flat Earth argument, would you? What's the figurative pot of gold, fountain of youth, or arcane knowledge or whatever that's on the other side of the Flat Earth that we had to invent a deliberately contrived version of GPS and satellite TV in order to keep people from trying to find it?

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   3 months ago

          A: Pretend the earth is a sphere when it’s actually a flat plane.

          B: ??????????????

          C: Profit!!!

  40. MWAocdoc   3 months ago

    "a prolonged and politicized environmental review process made it impossible to prevent an environmental disaster."

    What will entrenched bureaucrats learn from this? "The beatings will continue until private enterprise morale improves."

  41. YuckFou   3 months ago

    The Epstein files was a "bridge too far" to hang on Bondi - she couldn't possibly have enough staff to redact the names of the innocent from the millions of documents. Maybe if she had talked to Elon about using Grok to filter the stuff...
    Most libtard media and mental midgets don't understand how poisonous those files are to the innocent..
    Bondi didn't have management experience for a task this size - i.e. cleaning up after the Shit-stain administration.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

      Did you have a point other than blathering? Didn't see it.

  42. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   3 months ago

    "Flat-earth always bugged me as to why..."
    Not the only woo bleefs.
    Normally, you can find someone making money, but (similar to all of us taking down clocks and changing the settings twice a year) who in hell is profiting?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Did Congress Vote To End the Iran War After It Finished?

Matthew Petti | 6.24.2026 5:00 PM

Darializa Avila Chevalier Will Be This Congress' First Campus Radical

Robby Soave | 6.24.2026 4:40 PM

Supreme Court Ruling Offers Hope to an Iowa Marijuana User Who Got 4 Years for Owning Guns

Jacob Sullum | 6.24.2026 4:18 PM

DOJ Says Equal Opportunity Officials Pressured Employers Into Race-Based Discrimination

Alison Somin | 6.24.2026 4:04 PM

Elizabeth Warren Wants To Raise Taxes and Give All the Money to Senior Citizens

Eric Boehm | 6.24.2026 3:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks