17 Ways Politicians Can Make Things Cheaper, Starting With Food, Health Care, and Appliances
A real affordability agenda would unleash free markets, not constrain them.
"Affordability" is the hot new policy frame in American politics. Zohran Mamdani won the New York City mayoralty vowing to slash the cost of living with rent freezes, "free" buses, and city-run grocery stores. Mikie Sherrill coasted to New Jersey's governorship promising to cap electricity bills. Those Democrats' success has now caught the GOP's attention. "It's all about prices," Republican strategist Doug Heye told Reuters. "People are furious when they go out and spend money at the grocery store, and they can't believe what they are spending."
This poses an awkward policy challenge: Can politicians actually do anything to assuage voters' annoyance with high prices? Sure, everyone wants cheaper housing, food, and health care. But most of the discontent stems from a burst of inflation that has had cash prices jumping 20 percent to 30 percent since 2020. This can't be wished away. Wages rose faster than prices for most of this year, which should have eased discontent. Yet the griping hasn't stopped, despite this "affordability" improvement. What people really seem to want is their 2019 price levels back.
That's not going to happen—and shouldn't. Inflation and deflation are macro beasts, driven by the imbalance between the growth in the money supply and real output. The only way to claw prices back to 2019 levels would be to crush demand by squeezing spending across the board, thus triggering a deep recession.
Yet "nothing can be done" and "just wait it out" doesn't win elections, so bad ideas are filling the void. When voters demand action, politicians oblige with quick fixes like Mamdani's rent caps—the kind of intervention that reliably spawns shortages, black markets, and chaos—or a flood of subsidies that merely shift costs around, while piling on new regulations that inflate prices further.
There is a better response, though not necessarily a simple one. Back in the 1970s, public frustration over rising prices helped pave the way for deregulation that actually brought transportation costs down. A smart, market-friendly response to today's affordability angst would be to tell local, state, and federal officials to follow the same playbook. Forget price controls, subsidies, and stimulus gimmicks. If you're serious about affordability, focus on lowering production costs. Do it by tearing down the barriers you have imposed that are choking the supply of essential goods and services.
Americans spend almost 70 percent of their budgets on shelter (20.1 percent), transportation (17 percent), food (12.9 percent), health care (8 percent), utilities, fuels, and public services (6 percent), and household furnishings (3.2 percent), according to the 2023 Consumer Expenditure Survey. Every single one of those is tangled up in supply-choking regulation. To lower costs, officials should cut the red tape that inflates these prices. Here are 17 actions, across six categories, they can take to do so:
Food
1. End Sugar Quotas
Food is ground zero in affordability politics. Inflation has driven food spending up 29 percent since 2019, with lower-income families now spending more than $1,000 a month on groceries. While economic conditions explain the bulk of this (egg prices, for example, soared in early 2025 because avian flu culled 11 percent of America's egg-laying hens, before falling again), bad policies raise certain food prices structurally—starting with the sugar program. Sugar quotas and tariff-rate quotas have doubled U.S. sugar prices against world prices since 1982, costing consumers between $2.4 billion and $4 billion annually. Repeal would slash costs, providing cheaper cereals, candy, baked goods, and soft drinks. Ethanol mandates and milk pricing schemes deserve the same treatment.
2. End Tariffs on Food
New tariffs from President Donald Trump act as a further grocery tax. When the administration briefly slapped 40 percent duties on Brazilian coffee and other foods this year and then abruptly removed them, global coffee prices fell between 1 percent and 3 percent in a day. Want to cut supermarket costs fast? Start by scrapping tariffs on beef, sugar, and juice too.
3. Expand Agricultural Immigration Visas
Immigration crackdowns also drive up food prices. A 10 percent drop in farm labor can shrink fruit and vegetable production by 4.2 percent. With 42 percent of the crop workforce at risk of deportation or exit, today's enforcement push is a recipe for labor disruption and higher prices. Expanding agricultural visas and ending the deportation merry-go-round would do the opposite: boost labor supply, keep crops from rotting, and take the edge off produce prices.
Health Care
4. Expand the Scope of Independent Practices
Washington has spent decades turning health care into a mess of subsidies and third-party payments. Transforming it into a functioning market requires a comprehensive set of supply and demand reforms. But if Congress won't strip away subsidies in the near term (the immediate effect of which would make health care less affordable for many), there are some clear ways to boost the supply of care and start bending costs down, whoever pays them. Out-of-pocket spending climbed to about $1,514 per person in 2023, making up roughly 11 percent of national spending on health consumption. Letting nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and clinical psychologists practice independently boosts access and lowers prices. Full-practice states provide significantly more health services than other states and have better overall health. Random assignment between medical doctors and nurse practitioners had no detectable differences in clinical outcomes, even as medical doctors charge 34 percent more than nurse practitioners for low-risk primary care doctor visits.
5. Allow More Over-the-Counter Medicines
Making safe meds—such as birth control and, eventually, GLP-1s—available over-the-counter increases access and lowers costs. When Opill, an over-the-counter birth control pill, launched at $19.99 per month, most women said they'd pay only between $1 and $10, showing how sensitive customers are to price.
6. Recognize Foreign Drug Approvals
Automatic approval for drugs and medicines approved by trusted foreign regulators (think the European Union, United Kingdom, Japan, Australia) would flood the market with more competition and me-too drugs, lowering prices further.
Household Appliances
7. Scrap the Tariffs
Furnishings and durable household gear make up 23 percent of durable goods spending and 8 percent of all goods. These home-related costs spike by $7,000 when people buy a new home. Regulations set in Washington have been hiking the bill. In June, steel and aluminum tariffs doubled from 25 percent to 50 percent, jacking up costs on fridges, washers, dryers, ovens, and dishwashers. As of June, appliance prices were already tracking nearly 4 percent above pre-2025 trends. We've seen this movie before: Trump's 2018 washer tariffs hiked washer prices by 12 percent, with even prices for untariffed dryers rising as manufacturers spread the pain. Consumers ended up paying an extra $1.5 billion annually. If you want cheaper appliances fast, scrap the tariffs.
8. Relax Licensing Requirements for Repairmen
Of course, you need people to install and fix appliances. HVAC and plumbing work is heavily licensed; more stringent requirements raise prices without obvious safety benefits. Excessively stringent state licensing requirements raise prices significantly for consumers in need of general home repair. Comparing the most to least stringent regulatory regimes, prices are over 15 percent higher for $200–$500 jobs when more stringent, and over 50 percent higher for jobs over $1,000—exactly the range for air-conditioning repairs or a water-heater install. Easing burdensome licensing for routine HVAC tasks and relaxing it for basic plumbing, in favor of simple registration and insurance requirements, would increase competition, shorten wait times, and push down the cost of keeping the kit in your home running.
Housing
9. Release Land for Building
We know how to make housing cheaper: allow more to be built. That starts with releasing more land in the West and also relaxing arbitrary urban growth boundaries around such cities as Portland, Oregon; San Jose, California; Honolulu, Hawaii; Virginia Beach, Virginia; and Knoxville, Tennessee.
10. Upzone
States and localities should tear down zoning codes that ban dense development, height limits that stifle building up, and mandates for parking spots and staircases that add thousands to unit costs. Upzoning alone increases local housing supply and living space by about 9 percent within a decade, dampening rent as a "viable policy for increasing housing affordability," one recent Journal of Urban Economics study finds. Even in places where rents don't fall significantly with land-use reform, more housing improves mobility, letting people move to where the jobs are and boosting real wages.
11. More By-Right Permits
Sweeping zoning reform takes time and requires assembling political coalitions. But states can slash costs right now by adopting "by-right" permitting for already-zoned projects. Making approvals automatic, unless the government can quickly prove why builders shouldn't go ahead, would lower costs by thousands of dollars per home and mitigate developers' risks. Pairing by-right rules with strict permit "shot clocks" and real judicial review can cut delay risk further, encouraging more new construction today.
Energy
12. Approve More Pipelines, More Quickly
Energy is another budget drainer. The average household spends about $1,730 a year on electricity and $2,700 on gasoline. Power prices are up 35 percent from 2020's average. This is mostly because of inflation and rising demand. But surging demand requires flexible supply to avoid price surges. And governments create bottlenecks here. In New England, constrained gas pipelines mean wild price spikes when cold weather hits. During January 2022's historic blizzard, New England's day-ahead electricity prices blew past $100 per megawatt-hour 25 times. Approving more pipes, and forcing faster federal and state approvals, could mean the end of losing your shirt to pay your heating bill every winter.
13. End Tariffs on Goods Needed for Electrical Grids
We could also stop taxing grid buildouts through tariffs. Section 232 duties on imported steel, aluminum, and copper jack up the cost of poles, wires, and substations. The International Energy Agency estimates that materials comprise more than half of a new transformer's total costs. Removing those duties would offer immediate relief while we reconsider reforming thornier climate regulations on power plants.
14. Repeal the Jones Act
Then there's the Jones Act's impact on energy transportation. That law's requirement that cargoes between U.S. ports use U.S.-built, -owned, and -crewed vessels drives up the cost of transporting fuel. A 2023 working paper from economists for the Becker Friedman Institute for Economics found that eliminating the Jones Act would have cut East Coast gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel prices by $0.63–$0.82 per barrel in 2018–19, delivering $770 million per year in consumer benefits.
Driving
15. End the 'Chicken Tax'
Want to cut transportation costs? Start by abolishing the 25 percent "chicken tax" on imported light trucks. Doing that, and resisting copycat auto tariffs, would show up directly in far lower sticker prices. Congress could also kill the kludgy Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. These complex rules, intended to improve fuel efficiency, add cost and complexity to vehicles, raising prices. Furthermore, regulators impose laxer standards on trucks and SUVs as a sop to American automakers, essentially punishing companies for making smaller, cheaper cars (one reason such vehicles have largely disappeared from the market). Fortunately, the CAFE standards have recently begun resembling a dead letter. The One Big Beautiful Bill removed financial penalties for noncompliance, and the Trump administration recently relaxed the stricter targets previously set under President Joe Biden.
16. Allow Direct Sales
State dealer-franchise laws ban direct-to-consumer car sales, forcing buyers to buy from local monopolies. Economists have found that this hikes prices between 2 percent and 9 percent. The government should let automakers sell straight to drivers. While we're at it, clear out the remaining taxi-cartel rules and greenlight driverless cabs, putting further downward pressure on local transport prices.
17. End or Ease Buy American Rules
The federal government should kill Buy American laws too. These rules force transit agencies to use U.S.-made steel, buses, and rail cars, even when imports are cheaper. The Federal Transit Administration now demands more than 70 percent domestic content, and it won't grant a waiver unless U.S. parts push costs up by more than 25 percent. Those extra capital costs don't disappear—they resurface as higher fares, steeper local taxes, or both. Add in endless environmental review delays, and you've got a recipe for overpriced infrastructure.
What Else?
Those ideas aren't the full menu. A serious affordability agenda would take aim at child care, clothing, and dozens of other essentials. Even in the areas covered here, there's more that could be done. The guiding principle is clear: Trade liberalization and deregulation can unleash supply, expand consumer choice, and improve affordability—sometimes through lower prices, sometimes by making room for cheaper, lower-frills options. Even when prices don't drop much, greater efficiency boosts wages.
In the long run, what people care about is how far their money goes. This requires economic growth. But after an inflation shock has jacked up prices, consumers aren't in the mood to wait. Officials should respond by letting markets work, not by stumbling into price controls and costly subsidies.
And maybe next time, Washington could try not overstimulating the economy through reckless monetary and fiscal policy in the first place.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Shut down the USDA.
You might like this from a few years back.
https://reason.com/2012/06/30/the-sickening-nature-of-many-food-safety/
Isn't reusing the same poker still standard?
I don't know. The whole process sounds like "does a witch float". It assumes the inspector can jab the poker into diseased areas to start with, and that diseased areas have distinctive smells. Does he only jab once per cow?
Depends on the woman.
There it is, the shilling for 'we need a permanent underclass we can exploit for their labor to maintain out standard of living' policy proposal.
18. Allow Slavery
A strange set of proposals. None will pass; the entrenched beneficiaries have too much at stake. Yet all are proposed as if they are somehow the more attainable ways of reducing government meddling.
If I were wishing for the unobtainable-yet-still-legal, it would be much simpler:
* Trim government back to its enumerated powers.
* Stop pretending that "general welfare" means "do anything".
* Undo all reinterpretations of the Constitution that are de facto amendments in violation of Article V.
* Allow individual people to convene juries who have the final say in whether laws, regulations, and actions pass muster; the ultimate veto, with no government involvement: no judges or prosecutors, no appeals courts.
In short, no economic meddling, no minimum wage laws, occupational licensing, land zoning, building codes, anti-trust, none of that. No §230 excuses for butting in, nothing.
So...anarchy.
Libertarian is just a bit to the left of Anarchy but not even half way to the center. Where the USA was founded.
Do you know what §230 is?
Can you try for just once to stop pretending to be so stupid?
It’s not pretending.
Excellent ideas except...
"This requires economic growth." Absolutely Correct. (hut hum; production)
And you've got a contradiction there.
How is the US production-economy suppose to grow while tax-exempting/pushing-for JUST importing everything (0% tariffs)?
You can't. The US Nazi-Empire has created a debt that has to be dealt with. Which is 90% of your inflation hurdle. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
Zero tariffs are a good idea. Industries that need protection from competition need to die.
Fool fool fool
You're right.
So why are you trying to protect 'imports' from domestic competition who has to pay taxes?
Say what? How do 0% tariffs prevent domestic production?
Good god that's an ignorance even more profound than Trump. You are saying that 0% tariffs mean ...
1. We import everything and produce nothing domestically.
2. Because we produce nothing, we export nothing except dollars.
3. Foreigners collect all those dollars from us buying their production.
4. Foreigners burn those dollars, because the only other use would be buying stuff from the US, but the US produces nothing, so there's nothing for foreigners to buy.
5. Foreigners in effect are gifting us everything we buy from them, since they have no use for the dollars we send back in exchange for all those imports.
It's a real simple proposition. Dollars out have to equal dollars in.
* If we send more dollars out from buying imports than we receive from selling exports, then foreigners can either buy more of our exports to use those dollars, or burn those excess dollars.
* If we receive more dollars from selling exports than we send from buying imports, then foreigners have to either sell us more imports to collect more dollars, or they have to buy fewer of our exports because they have fewer dollars to buy them.
There’s another option for foreigners with surplus dollars besides buying our exports — invest in the US, which they do.
Ah, dollars in. What, you think those dollars don't count as dollars in?
Besides which, his basic premise is that the US produces nothing domestically. Pray tell, what would those foreigners be investing in?
Food trucks?
Buying the US landmass right out from under us...
As-if that hasn't been all over the news lately.
YES. Everything you stated is more true than not.
Except No. "Dollars out have to equal dollars in."
Which is precisely where DEBT resides.
Mostly good ideas, but there's a much simpler way:
Abolish the income tax. Everyone would have more money, and it would cost less for companies to make stuff.
repeal the 16th!
That would be the BEST idea ever; short the verge-of-bankruptcy DEBT.
States and localities should tear down zoning codes that ban dense development, height limits that stifle building up, and mandates for parking spots and staircases that add thousands to unit costs.
Yeah, who wants to have enough parking near where they live? And who doesn't mind a new high rise apartment building going in next door to them, after they bought in an area that previously banned them?
And who needs staircases? If the new buildings have enough floors, I guess you could just parachute or hang glide off them if there's a fire.
I would not mind a highrise next to me. There is already an elevator building across the street.
That’s because you live in a city. Not everyone wants to live in a crappy noisy dirty city.
There are plenty of people that do want to live in crappy noisy cities and that is why housing prices are so high. Why do people want to live in crappy noisy dirty cities, because that is where the jobs are located.
What makes you think capitalists spending their own money care so little about investing wisely that they would build houses and stores that no one wants to buy?
Once again, with feeling: people with skin in the game make much better decisions than third party bureaucrats.
Better decisions for themselves. For other people, not so much.
Providing things customers want us selfish.
Bezos, Musk, and even Gates and Ellison didn't get rich by providing what customers didn't want.
I have seen several studies which show that society benefited far more from their companies than the innovators did; their personal gain amounted to 1-2% of what society gained.
You apparently have a problem with that.
Except the current people there with skin in the game, they don't count for some strange collectivist reason.
Sadly this writer did not include the fact that during Covid supply and demand was abused.
Forcing the shut downs and cutting off supply did not increase demand, it shut off supply feigning high demand.
Then when some of the supply was allowed to return the demand was again exaggerated as being higher than normal.
Disgustingly prices were increased under the guise of high demand and when the supply chains were finally active again the prices were never reduced.
Similarly when energy prices were artificially skyrocketed as Obama said they needed to be for the fundamental transformation of America to occur, prices climbed.
Now energy prices are reduced yet the prices have not come down. Companies will keep the transportation cost savings.
And of course with AI coming along and massive server farms being built rapidly, electricity is in high demand and the home owners will pay through the nose while the corporations pay less. Blackouts will be contained to residential areas and not the precious server farms.
Businesses will use the higher electricity prices as reason for inflating prices.
There's no way prices will come down. There's no way for prices to return to lower levels.
The progressives ensured this because on top of the aforementioned, Biden and the democrats pushed through abhorrent spending bills for absurd programs and projects and the fraud and abuse of the democrats will never be recouped.
The only way for affordability to become a reality is wage growth advancing higher than inflation and the quantitative easing of the Fed even with reductions in interest rates and deregulation.
Good luck with any of that.
Attempting to paint tariffs as the problem or the only way to affordability is disingenuous and nonsense.
Also suggesting illegal immigrant labor is a requirement to affordability is horrible.
"Forcing the shut downs and cutting off supply did not increase demand"
Nothing kills demand like mass death. Without the shutdown there would have been millions more dead.
+8 on the walz scale
I think your a on the Trump+++++ dementia scale. You really don't even remember what it was like during the early times in the Covid pandemic. Maybe if you had spent a month on a ventilator you might have more sense.
Absolute 100% bullshit once again. Do you even have an honest bone in your body?
1. End every government program not specifically mentioned in the consitution.
That is it.
Like the Air Force, and immigration restrictions. Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government allowed to restrict immigration.
Funny no originalist ever mentions this about immigration.
Keep dreaming selfish-entitled leftards.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 (the enumerated powers)
"To" ... "repel Invasions"
"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Keep playing ignorant to the parts of the Constitution you don't like.
Ya know like National Defense (BORDER Defense)!
FFS what do you think the whole reason a 'Union of States' was even created for?
Armed-theft of the citizenry for those who identify as *special*?
...With 42 percent of the crop workforce at risk of deportation...
Replacing illegal workers with legal ones that require minimum wage, payroll tax, health insurance, OSHA rules, etc. will not make anything cheaper.
The concept of illegal worker is not in the Constitution at all.
More BS.
"To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization"
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of *citizens* of the United States"
Course you know you're spreading self-interest BS; everyone does.
Bring back slavery!
>>"Affordability" is the hot new policy frame in American politics.
affordability is a feeling.
Executive summary: There is ONE, and ONLY ONE way the government can make anything less expensive. GET OUT OF THE WAY.
Want things to be more affordable? Make sure you provide increasing value to your customers or employer so your income grows faster than inflation.
1.) Health care: OTC drug reform is all you could come up with? How about letting medical assistants perform more routine work for dental/health care? Reform the medical schools: Requiring far too many years bottled up in training, too few schools.... and in the end forcing us to import 3rd World doctors anyway?
2) Cheap immigrant labor: Yeah, get more cheap labor to pick strawberries you get cheaper strawberries. Except you ignore the wisdom: Cheap labor is expensive. Look, if Walmart employees and military families require welfare, what do you think armies of 5 child families with zero skills and one bread winner will require? Answer: A lot of stinking welfare. Great for the corporations. Bad for everyone else. You shut down the welfare industrical complex? Ok then we can talk about open border. But not before.
You wrong because the Walmart employee and military families are citizens. Immigrants, documented and undocumented, don't get welfare.
A big part of the problem is that so many have vested interest in maintaining the status quo that it stops needed reforms. Sugar producers want their subsidies. NIMBY is strong in so many locations. People want cheap food and services but they don't want the immigrant labor necessary for the food harvests and services. People also think the government can turn back the world economy with tariffs. The country has turned it back on people of vision for the blinders of populism.