A D.C. Man Was Arrested for Mocking National Guard Troops with Star Wars' 'Imperial March.' Now He's Suing.
Sam O'Hara went viral for playing "The Imperial March" behind groups of National Guard soldiers in D.C. He also says it led to him being illegally detained.
A Washington, D.C., resident who was handcuffed and detained in September for mocking National Guard soldiers by playing "The Imperial March" from Star Wars on his cellphone is suing the soldiers and police officers for their stormtrooper-like behavior.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of D.C. filed a federal lawsuit today on behalf of Sam O'Hara, arguing that his detention violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights by cutting off his peaceful protest.
"The law might have tolerated government conduct of this sort a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away," O'Hara's lawsuit states. "But in the here and now, the First Amendment bars government officials from shutting down peaceful protests, and the Fourth Amendment (along with the District's prohibition on false arrest) bars groundless seizures."
After President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops to D.C., O'Hara began following National Guard soldiers around playing "The Imperial March" on his cell phone as a form of protest. His lawsuit says O'Hara wanted "to encourage the public to view the deployment as a waste of tax dollars, a needless display of force, and a surreal danger."
According to his lawsuit, on September 11, O'Hara was tailing four Ohio National Guard soldiers and doing his usual bit.
"Less than two minutes after the protest began," the lawsuit says, "Sgt. [Devon] Beck turned around and said, 'Hey man, if you're going to keep following us, we can contact Metro PD and they can come handle you if that's what you want to do. Is that what you want to do?'"
O'Hara allegedly did not respond but continued to follow, at which point the Empire decided to strike back.
Beck called the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) of Washington, D.C. The lawsuit claims that shortly after several MPD cars arrived. The MPD officers allegedly accused O'Hara of harassing the soldiers, and they detained and handcuffed him.
When O'Hara argued that he was engaged in protest, one of the MPD officers allegedly responded, "That's not a protest. You better define protest. This isn't a protest. You are not protesting."
However, recording and mocking law enforcement are both firmly protected by the First Amendment, as long as one doesn't interfere with their duties.
Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote in 1987, in a ruling striking down a Houston ordinance that made it unlawful to oppose or interrupt a police officer, that "the freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state."
To put it another way, if you act like an autocratic villain when someone compares you to an autocratic villain, you just might be an autocratic villain.
According to his lawsuit, O'Hara was released after 15 to 20 minutes without charges.
"Armed National Guard should not be policing D.C. residents as we walk around our neighborhoods," O'Hara said in an ACLU of D.C. press release. "It was important to me not to normalize this dystopian occupation. Instead of respecting my right to protest, police officers handcuffed me so tightly my wrists were still marked and sore the next day. This shows the danger of deploying troops onto American streets: it puts all our basic rights at risk."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Dude sounds like quite the cunt.
No wonder CJ and the ACLU are fond of him,.
Yeah, this dude is like the worst kid in school. So desperate for attention and in serious need of a beating.
That said, you can't arrest people for being twats. Partly because of the importance of free speech, and partly because we don't have nearly enough prisons to hold them all. All with the caveat that there's a very high chance that isn't actually what happened here.
Yeah, it is not illegal to be a cunt, you are correct. I also am not one to just assume we are getting the full story.
Detainment and Terry Stops hold up in court. The LEOs will need to articulate the reason why.
As the commentariat is fond of saying , " FYTW" . Though, that has less (but not zero) chance of holding up in court.
They should have shot him in the face so lefties like you could support the LEOs since murdering protesters is something you all cheer.
If you said that about Charlie Kirk you'd be doxxed by right-wingers.
But saying that about Ashli Babbit gets cheers from lefty shit-piles. Lemme guess that would be you.
No doxxing needed when morons did those videos under their own names. Fuck the lot of them.
Charlie Kirk wasn’t in the middle of protesting…
He made the mistake of trying to speak to progressives.
This guy was protesting the government. That means, according to Trump and Johnson, he was an ANTIFA terrorist so he has no rights. After all, free speech is only for people who agree with the government.
Just as retarded as when sarcmaddow does it.
After all, free speech is only for people who agree with the government.
Sucks when the boot is on the other foot, isn't it?
Did he have permission from the copyright holder to play the music in public?
That's a civil offense. The PRO would have to sue.
>>... handcuffed me so tightly my wrists were still marked and sore the next day.
guess who isn't into bondage?
Pretty sure dude's not even into sex. At least not with humans.
lolproblynotno
He forgot to shout, “I CAN’T BREATHE”?
What an idiot. The Imperial March is *Vader's* theme, not the stormtroopers.
>To put it another way, if you act like an autocratic villain when someone compares you to an autocratic villain, you just might be an autocratic villain.
The Guard, hanging out like a bunch of security guards, are 'autocratic villains' now?
Also, dude wasn't arrested for playing music. Not saying he should have been arrested but stop with the ridiculousness.
"Man in vagina costume arrested at protest!"
What was he doing?
"Lying prone on a rooftop with a rifle aimed at ICE agents, with shell casings inscribed with "bella bella ciao"
Obviously a free speech violation l
Authorities are stumped as to a motive since during interrogation, the suspect’s lips were sealed.
>"Armed National Guard should not be policing D.C. residents as we walk around our neighborhoods," O'Hara said
Why though?
What is the problem? DC is federal territory, the local cops are swamped, and the *locals* mostly seem to welcome it? It's the outsiders and people from the rich parts of DC that don't like it.
We need the troops to protect K Street lobbyist? Troops aren't police, police aren't social workers; stop asking your plumber to rewire your house.
Tourist advisory: Don't travel to DC, instead travel to say Gettysburg and tour the battlefield or countless other nice locals that have historical significance without the crime.
Annapolis is interesting, too.
Gettysburg is a good reminder what happens when team D goes too far.
This ^
Troops are security guards. Their mere presence stops a lot of shit from happening.
I eagerly await The Rest of the Story.
The part not written by a TDS-addled pile of shit.
When we find out what he was really doing.
So... is Reason going to write a 500 word piece on every arrest made during a protest? Because if that's what we're doing, I can think of around ~1583 more articles that you could wring out.
That wasn’t a protest, it was an insurrection!!!1!1!1!!1!1!
They certainly aren’t going to write articles when illegal alien ralefugees rape and murder Americans nor any article for when an illegal alien rapefugee raped a corpse on a NYC subway. They pen CUCLL fluff.
The hardest part of being a libertarian is having to put up with rightoids like you because you’re not wanted in any space that has any limits on free speech.
Yes, we realize how much your side hates getting a dose of its own "liberating tolerance."
Viva la raza!!!
LOL, goddamn, son, you really love stalking my posts.
Sorry, I’ll leave you alone mi hermano.
Correct. Being a little L libertarian, I have been booted from online forums that have limits on libertarian speech. To date, these have mostly been woke progressive newspapers and socialist forums. All those places had severe limits on speech that did not support their globohomo, collectivism, war bonering to push their broken paradigms on other cultures aka team D philosophies.
I find all this "people's action" against the various standing armies a refreshing return to 1770. Two flaws, though:
1. The people protesting are the criminals and the criminal abettors.
1a. So were the 1770 smugglers and stamp tax protestors. But they had tried the courts and been told to eff off because it was a parliamentary decision, and tough luck they had no parliamentary representation. These modern day protestors either lost their election or are not citizens.
2. They will forget this principle the instant the electoral pendulum swings the other way.
1. Really, they're criminals? Did you go to a no kings rally? Lots of average people there - middle aged dudes with kids, grannies, etc. Seemed like a random slice of America.
2. Yes, very few people have real principles. The ones complaining about being censored are now censoring. The power Trump is abusing will be abused by Dems. That's why we should push for a government with checks and balances and with dispersed power, not concentrating power at the top.
Lots of average people there - middle aged dudes with kids, grannies, etc. Seemed like a random slice of America.
LOL, yeah, a shitlib slice that doesn't even like the country, but will take on the trappings of patriotism when they aren't bitching about what a racist, unequal shithole the US is.
The National Guard wasn't in DC to 'protect' it from the "No Kings" national temper tantrum thrown by a few million brainwashed Kamala-supporting zombies who only get their daily civics lessons from The View and Rachel Madcow. But be patient - the carjackings, murders and overall drug-addicted insane gutter slime will return when you get your preferred D back in 2029.
No Kings was mostly middle and retirement age white people. Millions of them. Not even close to reality to say they’re all criminals or illegal aliens cmon now.
The part you are probably mostly right on is that they lost election, but that’s the inherent trait of protesting. It’s a critique of power.
You two missed my point. I should have been clearer that I was talking about the anti-ICE rioters. After all, that's the main point of the National Guard deployments.
"Armed National Guard should not be policing D.C. residents as we walk around our neighborhoods," O'Hara said
I agree. Unfortunately, you insufferable twats keep voting in Democrats who have stripped you of your right to self defense.
Unlike the galactic Empire, I suspect the Guard are better shots than the Imperial stormtroopers.
Hilarious how they think playing Vader's music doesn't make the Nasty Girls seem more badass.
Utterly predictable responses from the cultists - "yes, we know that in theory you have a 1A right to free speech, but in practice you're not supposed to exercise it against the Regime, and only a supporter of Goldstein would do so, so fuck him".
Utterly predictable response from the simps--"Yes, we know the left went out of its way to suppress its political enemies over the last 15 years, but we must wring our hands when their enemies decide to apply their own standard to them."
Aaand "whatabout" strikes again.
Because Obama might have asked then IRS to look into right-wing non-profits, therefore a citizen exercising 1A rights should be arrested.
What a fuckwit you are.
No, but no one takes you seriously when you start whining about it *now* when you defended it in the past.