5 Years After Breonna Taylor Was Killed, 1 Officer Gets 33 Months
Brett Hankison was convicted of violating Breonna Taylor’s Fourth Amendment rights during a fatal no-knock police raid.

It's been over five years since the tragic death of Breonna Taylor, who was fatally shot during a no-knock police raid at her home in Louisville, Kentucky. On Monday, Brett Hankison, a former Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) officer, was sentenced to 33 months in prison and three years of supervised release for unlawfully using deadly force and violating Taylor's Fourth Amendment rights. Hankison, who was convicted in November 2024 on one count of civil rights abuse in a United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, had faced up to a maximum sentence of life in prison.
"We got something," Taylor's mother, Tamika Palmer, told WLKY, a local CBS News affiliate, following the hearing. "I don't think it was a fair sentencing, but it was a start."
On the night of the fatal police raid in March 2020, LMPD officers arrived at Taylor's home to conduct a no-knock raid based on a misleading and legally deficient search warrant linking Taylor, a 26-year-old EMT, to drug dealing based on receiving packages for an ex-boyfriend.* Standing outside, Hankison blindly fired 10 rounds into Taylor's blinds- and curtain-covered window and sliding glass door.*
Although none of those shots killed Taylor, Hankison was fired three months after the raid for having "displayed an extreme indifference to the value of human life" and "wantonly and blindly" firing his gun, according to acting Police Chief Robert Schroeder. In September 2020, the former LMPD officer was indicted by a Kentucky grand jury on three felony counts for endangering Taylor's neighbors based on bullets found in her adjacent apartment. But Hankison was acquitted in March 2022, after the jury unanimously found that he did not act with "wanton endangerment," despite the clear evidence that he acted recklessly and without regard to whether his gunfire would injure or kill Taylor, her neighbors, or even his fellow officers. As Reason's Jacob Sullum wrote following the trial, "that decision vividly illustrates how difficult it is to hold police officers accountable for using excessive force even in the rare cases where they face criminal charges."
However, five months later, Hankison was charged again, this time in federal court for willfully violating the rights of Taylor, her boyfriend, and her three neighbors based on his reckless conduct during the raid. He received two federal trials, with the first resulting in a mistrial. The second jury ultimately convicted Hankison for willfully violating Taylor's Fourth Amendment rights, endangering her life by unlawfully using deadly force.
In both trials, Hankison testified that he fired his gun to aid fellow officers, whom he thought were under sustained fire. In reality, the gunfire he heard was that of his fellow officers, who shot 22 rounds—one of which ended Taylor's life but was found to have been fired in self-defense—in response to Taylor's boyfriend's single shot at what he believed to be an intruder.
Hankison's sentencing hearing was originally set for April but was rescheduled multiple times. Leading up to the hearing, the United States Probation Office recommended a sentence between 11.25 and 14 years in prison. But on July 16, the Justice Department asked U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings to sentence Hankison to just one day in prison and three years of supervised release. Attempting to walk back Joe Biden–era police reform efforts, the filing argued the prosecution was excessive following a state acquittal—despite the state charges centering on Hankison endangering the neighbors, not Taylor—and a federal mistrial.
Hankison's legal team also filed a motion requesting a new trial because of "prosecutorial misconduct," which was denied on Friday. Jennings' ruling read, in part, that "the Court is frustrated by the nebulous and disjointed nature of the motion and corresponding briefs….This appears to be a circumstance of throwing everything possible at the Court and seeing what sticks."
Monday's sentencing marks an end to a long-fought battle to hold one LMPD officer accountable; he remains the only officer directly involved in the fatal raid convicted of a crime.* But in the five years since Taylor's death, police accountability remains elusive. Without strong reforms—like restricting the use of no-knock warrants and strengthening due process—Americans' constitutional right to be free from the use of excessive or deadly force by law enforcement officers will remain in jeopardy.
*CORRECTION: This article originally misstated the number of packages Taylor received, where Hankison fired, and the number of LMPD officers directly involved in the raid who have been convicted.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Black officer, in the Capitol, shooting and killing an unarmed white woman = promotion.
2.75 years isn’t horrible given he didn’t injure or kill anyone.
He was part of an illegal home invasion which resulted in murder.
If they didn't have badges all of them would have faced felony murder charges whether they shot anyone or even if they didn't fire their weapon.
Nobody else was convicted. And it doesn’t look like he entered the house. Given those circumstances, his shots all missed, and he has a badge the 2.75 years isn’t horrible (from a realistic expected outcome).
I agree other officers as well as the legal team should face more serious time.
Well sure, if you don't have a badge and you receive an apparently legal no-knock warrant, you're not allowed to break into the house.
But if you do have a badge and you receive an apparently legal no-knock warrant, then you are allowed to break into the house.
I think the guy who lied to get the warrant should do time, and the legislature could have a public policy discussion about whether the warrants do more harm than good, but I don't see how following an apparently valid warrant constitutes wrongdoing.
Unfortunately Kentucky had years earlier yielded to social justice activists and repealed its felony murder statute. Thus the officer who lied to a judge to get a warrant escaped any state level prosecution.
He is still facing federal charges, but Trump will probably order Bondi to drop them.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/current-and-former-louisville-kentucky-police-officers-charged-federal-crimes-related-death
Search warrants are illegal??
It wasn’t an illegal home invasion. They knocked then pounded on the door identifying themselves as police. They then forced open the door and the second officer in was shot in the leg by Kenneth Walker, Breonna’s boyfriend, lacerating his femoral artery. He fired 2 shots in the direction of Walker and hit Taylor in the arm then collapsed. Another officer returned fire killing Taylor instantly. Her aorta was hit. After the second officer was hit Hankinson went to an outside window and when he heard what he thought was more fire from Walker, fired through a window and no one was hit. The police department told the officers only Breonna would be home, which was incorrect info. The police officers claim their department did not stand up much for them and never tried to correct misinformation about Breonna; she was an EMT but was fired for unknown reasons with orders never to be rehired. She was in with Walker and was fully involved with his drug operation even renting a car in which a dead body was found in the trunk. She had all the drug money in her own accounts. It was a raid that ended the way no one wanted and Hankinson is the only police officer that has ever been convicted in US history of firing through a window and not hitting anyone. Jonathan Mattingly, the wounded officer, has a book out explaining their side; 12 Seconds in the Dark. You’ll be hearing much more about this in the next few weeks.
I was gonna say "Whatabout her holiness Saint Babbitt of the Church of Trump! Only radical leftists talk about police shootings without saying a prayer to her! Whatabout! Whatabout! Whatabouuuuuut!"
But someone beat me too it.
So Chumby's not on the list.
Reminder. Sarc supports blind shots for some officers.
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
Chuggernaut supports Team Blue
This should be a tough one for libertarians to figure out.
- Hankinson did not get convicted of killing Breonna Taylor based on the technicality that he did not, in fact, kill Breonna Taylor. In fact, none of his bullets hit anyone. He probably *should* have been convicted of unreasonably discharging his weapon and given whatever sentence a cop would be given for firing 10 shots in a panic and not hitting anyone.
- He was found not guilty at trial, presumably because the jury thought that once Taylor's boyfriend started shooting at cops, it was reasonable for Hankinson to return fire even if he couldn't see the target. You can definitely argue about that, but it's weird to see Reason celebrating retrying a guy who was found not guilty at trial.
- The article suggests that it's an injustice that more cops didn't do more time. It's hard for me to see how libertarians can want to see people punished if the things they did *were not crimes.*
(The guy who lied to get the no knock warrant should, IMHO, have done time, but unless I missed it, the article doesn't even *mention* him.)
They are satisfied with one cop scalp. Even if it is the one who was arguably least culpable in creating the situation that led to Taylor's death.
In the world of Reason's writers, police are undeserving of civil right protections.
The cop most culpable is the one who lied to a judge to get the warrant. He still faces federal charges. In many states, he would have been charged with felony murder.
Wxactly
If he copped a plea in state court I doubt the feds would have prosecuted
Its pretty easy. This isnt a federal issue. Violating 4th amendment rights shouldnt be a federal crime unless it applies to federal officials. If there was a crime, it was a local one.
As far as I'm concerned a lot more people should be in prison in this case and, barring an active shooter with a hostage, no knock raids are by definition excessive force. But we're also guaranteed that we won't face double jeopardy in this Republic. A jury was unwilling to convict and whether I agree or not with the verdict it's our accepted definition of justice. The federal government is outside it's jurisdiction here.
So the only LEO that got convicted essentially faced double jeopardy. Was not responsible for killing Taylor. And was the lowest guy on the police totem pole at the scene. No one who organized or authorized the no-knock raid gets any legal punishment.
Hankison appears to be the pawn sacrificed to protect the higher ups.
Sarc says this is all good because "Saint Babbitt!" or something.
As Reason's Jacob Sullum wrote
Reason citing themselves! *drink*
5 Years After Breonna Taylor Was Killed, 1 Officer Gets 33 Months
Outrageous. That's a despicable outrage.
He should have received zero months. And lost his job.
Not because Whatsherface Crime Girlfriend is dead, but because he illustrated extremely poor gun safety.
Rule #4. No responsible gun owner, let alone a cop, blind fires anywhere. If you don't have your target lined up, you don't pull the trigger. Period.
It wasn't a "4A violation" - and the fact that they scraped the barrel with that ludicrous charge the third time around should tell you as much. It was a mishandling of his service weapon.
Deserving of termination from the force, sure. Jail? Hell no.
This was a scalp hunt to feed the BLM, nothing more. Because they were never going to convict Cosgrove and Mattingly, because the suspect shot at them first having broken the same gun rule as Hankinson.
Such nonsense. If Hankinson gets 33 months, the boyfriend should get 330. He's the one that kicked off the whole thing.
The boyfriend who opened fire on the police did do with a legal firearm to protect himself against an absolutely illegal break in. Apparently the Libertarians don't think Black people have rights to protect their property or lives with firearms and the Second Amendment doesn't apply to White people.
He blindly shot the exact same way the cop did.
That's not self-defense. That's reckless firearm use.
If the cop gets time, the boyfriend should get 10x as much for instigating the entire thing and getting his girlfriend killed.
The police instigated the entire thing by lying to get the warrant, which was therefore invalid. The cop who lied would be serving a life sentence for felony murder had this happened in Virginia.
That's a chicken or egg argument. You're stretching the causality to an absurd degree.
The fact is that the cops on the scene reasonably believed, and had no reason to believe to the contrary, that they had a rightful and legal reason to be there. The suspect came out blasting blind, hit one of the cops, and they properly returned fire.
Hankinson fired blind. That's blameworthy. The other two cops - totally justified.
Unless you're trying to pretend that they somehow should have known that the warrant was falsified by someone not even on the scene, you're reaching. You're trying to blame individual officer conduct on policing in general. Which reveals the ACAB.
The guy who falsified the warrant was fired and is going to stand trial. The officers who relied upon it, with no reason to question it, should not. You're trying to blame Hankinson for Janyes' conduct. That's BS.
The only bad behavior from those on the scene was one guy's poor gun safety. Which was no different from the suspect's poor gun safety.
Suspect wrongfully came out blasting blind. He should be facing 10x what the idiot cop is now facing.
I agree, when you are talking self-defense, you need to consider the immediate circumstances. The police being shot at were probably justified in returning fire (though not the guy wildly shooting from outside). But I do think people get a lot of leeway when defending themselves in their own home. I don't know exactly how it went down, so I won't say that he was or wasn't reckless with any confidence. I do think people are quite justified in shooting at police, that they have no way of knowing for sure are police, who are trying to break into their homes. Just like with anyone else who breaks into your home.
Y'know, I keep a shotgun within reach of my bed. Buck slug buck slug buck.
The reason I stack it that way is so that I can punch a round through a wall or a door if need be.
Now, I don't have a teenager slinking in at odd hours that might make me grab and rack but, if I did, I'd be darn sure I know who's slinking in my house before I fire that first slug thru the wall.
He blindly shot the exact same way the cop did.
Nope. Walker knew where his friendly was, and fired once in the direction of the intruders. Officer McPanicfire shot ten times through drawn curtains without regard for who might be in the way.
(Amusingly, Walker was 1 for 1 for his shots hitting a target. The "trained professional" cops couldn't put 20% of their shots on target, and zero on the lone actual hostile. They'd make Imperial Stormtroopers look like sharpshooters.)
Walker knew where his friendly was
No he didn't. There were four friendly's on scene, as I count it.
He blindly shot in the direction of two of them.
Again, retard: Rule #4.
It is not unreasonable to assume that someone breaking into your home in the middle of the night is unfriendly. Rule #4 is a good and important rule, but is not the law. Police break it all the time with little consequence. When you are in a self-defense situation you have to make a judgement very quickly as to the risk benefit of being absolutely certain. And castle doctrine means you get to assume that someone breaking into your home is a deadly threat.
Police break it all the time with little consequence.
And now there's consequences. Why shouldn't they similarly - if not more heavy-handed - be applied to the initial shooter?
And castle doctrine means you get to assume that someone breaking into your home is a deadly threat.
It doesn't mean you get to blast carelessly at wherever you perceive a threat.
It doesn't mean you get to blast carelessly at wherever you perceive a threat.
The law apparently disagrees, since charges against Walker were dismissed with prejudice. And he fired one shot; the "professionals" fired 32, with at least 10 being blind panic fire, six hitting an innocent bystander, and none actually hitting the source of the threat against the cops.
The law apparently disagrees, since charges against Walker were dismissed with prejudice.
To feed BLM. When this SOB was just as much to blame as anyone else there.
with at least 10 being blind panic fire, six hitting an innocent bystander, and none actually hitting the source of the threat against the cops.
Then make the case for that. I've already made it clear I won't side with cops who dump their mags blindly. If you think they're poor shots, then say so. If you think they shot as blindly as Hankinson, then say so. If you think that return fire isn't an appropriate response to being shot at by a criminal suspect, then say so. Make the case. Make the argument. Stake out your position you little bitch.
But if you're just here to puke out ACAB vomit then do us all a favor and go stick your head in a toilet instead.
There were four friendly's on scene, as I count it.
Nope, retard, just him and Taylor. If it's unreasonable to expect the Keystone cops to be mind readers and know their warrant was illegally obtained, it's similarly unreasonable to expect Walker to read minds and know the people breaking down his door weren't criminals. SYHTFOTW, dimwit.
And the three cops.
Those involved in the warrant should be the ones facing time. Barney Fife shooting wildly into other people's apartment is bad and deserves punishment but that doesn't even touch the crux of the problem in this case; a warrant should never have been issued.
The officer who lied to get the warrant is still facing federal charges.
Joshua Jaynes was already fired and is facing federal criminal trial.
If you break down someone's door in the middle of the night, a claim of "self-defense" should not be allowed.
Yeah, people like to pretend that it's obvious when an intruder is actually police with a legal reason to be there. But there is nothing to stop a bad guy from yelling "police" before breaking into your house. Castle doctrine needs to be strong and police need to understand that regular people are allowed to shoot people who break into their houses. They are the ones who signed up to take on these dangerous situations and are supposedly trained to deal with them, not the people minding their own business at home.
Better yet, don't create these dangerous situations. Knock on the door at a decent hour. Or if that seems too dangerous, stake out the home until the suspect leaves and arrest him outside.