IMF Report: Trump Trade War Will Hurt Both U.S. and Global Economies
Predictions for U.S. and global economic growth are down since January.

Since his second term began, President Donald Trump has imposed double-digit tariffs on nearly every nation, sending markets into turmoil. Trump said it was necessary, posting in all caps on Truth Social, "Will there be some pain? Yes, maybe (and maybe not!)." But "it will all be worth the price that must be paid."
In a new report this week, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) found Trump's trade war would negatively affect both the U.S. and global economies.
"Following an unprecedented series of shocks in the preceding years, global growth was stable yet underwhelming through 2024 and was projected to remain so in the January 2025 World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update," the IMF wrote in the executive summary of the April 2025 WEO report. "However, the landscape has changed as governments around the world reorder policy priorities."
It did not mince words assigning blame. "A series of new tariff measures by the United States and countermeasures by its trading partners have been announced and implemented, ending up in near-universal US tariffs on April 2 and bringing effective tariff rates to levels not seen in a century. This on its own is a major negative shock to growth," not to mention "the unpredictability with which these measures have been unfolding."
In short, the IMF found, "the swift escalation of trade tensions and extremely high levels of policy uncertainty are expected to have a significant impact on global economic activity."
To the extent the report could make a prediction, it was rather negative: "Global growth is projected to drop to 2.8 percent in 2025 and 3 percent in 2026." As recently as January, the WEO had predicted 3.3 percent growth each year; the change constitutes "a cumulative downgrade of 0.8 percentage point, and much below the historical (2000–19) average of 3.7 percent."
The prognosis for the U.S. was even worse: "Growth in the United States is expected to slow to 1.8 percent, a pace that is 0.9 percentage point lower" than the prediction in January, it found. "The downward revision is a result of greater policy uncertainty, trade tensions, and a softer demand outlook, given slower-than-anticipated consumption growth. Tariffs are also expected to weigh on growth in 2026, which is projected at 1.7 percent amid moderate private consumption."
The report put the odds the U.S. would experience a recession this year at 37 percent—up from 25 percent odds in October 2024.
Economic growth will likely be lower than expected as a result of Trump's tariffs and restrictionist trade policy. Inflation is likely to get worse as well—both here and abroad.
"For advanced economies, the inflation forecast for 2025 has been revised upward by 0.4 percentage point since January," the report notes. Compared to the January 2025 prediction, the U.S. "inflation forecast has been revised upward…by 1.0 percentage point….This reflects stubborn price dynamics in the services sector as well as a recent uptick in the growth of the price of core goods (excluding food and energy) and the supply shock from recent tariffs."
It predicted the U.S. inflation rate would rise to 3 percent by the end of the year, but put the odds that it would "rise above 3.5 percent" at "more than 30 percent, compared with 13 percent back in October." The annualized inflation rate hit 3 percent in January but declined in the following two months.
Last week, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said there was a "strong likelihood" Trump's tariffs would cause prices and unemployment to rise in a manner that would be difficult for the Fed to address without exacerbating one problem or the other.
The IMF's chief economist warned in October that tariff increases like then-candidate Trump floated were "a policy that is harming basically everyone."
"Trump's plan to lower prices will be impeded by his support of broad-based tariffs on consumer goods and manufacturing inputs," Reason's Jack Nicastro wrote in January, the day after Trump's inauguration.
Trump owes his victory in November in large part to consumer dissatisfaction with the persistently high levels of inflation during Joe Biden's presidency, and he explicitly campaigned on lowering prices. "I will immediately bring prices down, starting on day one," he pledged in August 2024.
Now, Trump's tariffs are making things more expensive and making Americans poorer—and will have negative effects across the entire world.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Predictions have always been accurate.
oh no! predictions!
why don't you guys just go with 48-point bold THE SKY IS FALLING! everyday instead of working?
The trade war will hurt both the IMF *and* the ACA/Medicare/Medicaid/Big Pharma/Education *and* H1B Vibe-coding-dominated US economy? OH NOEZ!
Because there were exactly zero foreign tariffs against the U.S. before March of 2025...
Those were the right tariffs. And they convinced a lot of idiots that free trade was those sets of tariffs.
We can only control our own economic pain. And if, as you claim, the tariffs do actually create less tariffs worldwide (free-er trade than now), we’re going to lose more mass-production manufacturing jobs.
So is that what you want? I would be very happy if that were to happen because I know free trade is beneficial to everyone involved, but it doesn’t seem like you share that opinion.
Because you're a fucking moron Nelson.
What we have is not free trade. You seemingly even admit that.
The plan laid out by Bessent and Trump to induce a global reduction of tariffs to make them more fair. 14 countries have reached agreement. 34 more up this week. The goal is to reduce GLOBAL tariffs.
Yet you and your other leftist globalist retards push the status quo which you admit is not free trade. Your plan is to remain the same advantaged markets that benefit global corporations. Your plan is one that supports large managed trade bills that enshrined these advantages.
My goal is zero tariffs and a free market. I just understand what that is.
A tit for tat strategy can induced this goal. This has been shown in economic trade simulations for decades at this point. But you choose ignorance and narratives. You want managed central globalist trade packages. Not a free market. Because you're a fucking leftist dumbass who is easily fooled by narratives.
My goal is zero tariffs and a free market. I just understand what that is.
If you really understood that, you would realize that your idealized world has never, and will never exist. You stupid fuckers want to go back to some romanticized version of the past that only exists in the nostalgic fever dreams of your parents. Sadly, you will fuck up a lot shit in your foolish pursuit. You (or anybody) don't even know which goal Trump is pursuing; zero tarrifs, or onshore manufacturing. They are not the same and work against each other. Explain that one to me, asshole, unless it's not in your book.
No, as this article points out, we can control a lot of other countries' pain also.
“ Because there were exactly zero foreign tariffs against the U.S. before March of 2025...”
The tariffs that others have on our products don’t impact the prices in America, so foreign tariffs on us don’t make a bit of difference to us. They only matter to the country that imposes them. They raise the price of American goods for consumers in that country, but since there is enough worldwide demand for American goods if the tariffs are too high, the American company just sells their products somewhere else. That has zero impact on our economy, since we were killing it under the old structure (because we are, after all, the richest and most powerful nation in the world largely because of our economic success). Their tariffs can’t stop American business success, but Trump’s can.
Trump’s tariffs raise the prices that Americans pay for goods in America. They impact the profit margins of American companies that produce things overseas (which is virtually every company that makes things), but will never be high enough for long enough to get any noticeable number of jobs back. So American companies will lay people off because they have to cut costs, but there won’t be many new jobs coming to replace them. Guess what happens when a lot of people get laid off and there aren’t new jobs for them to fill?
So tariffs will inevitably cause inflation and unemployment. We had high inflation and high unemployment once before in our history, in the 70s. It’s called “stagflation” and it was brutally difficult to fix once it began.
Are you willing to accept the high interest rates it took to get stagflation under control again? Are you willing to pay 17% on your mortgage? For your car? For your HELOC?
How much economic pain are you willing to accept? And what results would make that pain worth it?
The tariffs that others have on our products don’t impact the prices in America, so foreign tariffs on us don’t make a bit of difference to us.
Wrong from the very first sentence. Lol.
Does IRAD and R&D get distributed as a cost based on number of goods sold, yes or no?
If i spend 1M in IRAD to develop an item and can sell 1M domestically, that cost is 1 dollar per unit. If I can sell another 1M internationally, the cost is 50 cents, reducing costs.
You know Jack shit about economics dumbass.
You know Jack shit about economics dumbass.
Maybe you can lend us your book Jesse, or point us to one of the 'schools of economics' that agrees with anything you spam here daily that is not the 'JesseAz Upstairs University of Economics'?
Foreign tariffs make no difference to Americans - but American tariffs affect foreigners?
How does that work only one way?
Globalists report globalist economics system they set up and profit from will be hurt by not remaining in the globalist system. - Reason.
Ignore the costs associated with the current system from an ever increasing welfare state and unemployment. Subsidizing of labor is a good thing. - Reason.
So, the world economy only prospers if all other countries ass rape the United States with bad trade deals. Good to know.
The US has favorable trade deals. It is a MAGA lie that we don't.
You keep saying blatantly false things. Ovrt all there are much higher tariffs in the US than there are on them.
All hail the central bankers!
Surprised they haven't deleted these.
https://reason.com/2024/12/18/imf-offers-a-glimpse-at-the-perils-of-central-bank-digital-currencies/
https://reason.com/2014/08/01/international-monetary-fund-proposes-car/
https://reason.com/2010/08/12/did-imf-say-usa-is-doa/
Some fun predictions from the IMF.
https://reason.com/2012/10/03/am-links-gary-johnson-running-in-2016-us/
https://reason.com/2009/03/09/world-economy-set-to-shrink-fo/
True patriots scoff at higher prices because they know it’s for their own good.
I will keep repeating the fact you have demanded higher income taxes for the last few years.
You actually joined shrike in calling Bidens economy good despite 21% inflation over 3 years.
You defend mass illegal immigration subsidized with taxpayer money putting upward pressure on housing costs.
You have zero room to talk about costs. Lol.
I mean, at some level, yes.
This is the point that I try to acknowledge when someone advocates for bringing lower skill manufacturing back here or stopping the export of white collar jobs to 2nd and 3rd world countries. Those policies will inherently mean higher prices for the consumer, at least in the short run. You know, because we don’t pay people $0.25 an hour.
I stopped reading at IMF.
This is pointless. The only thing that is known is that the US economy going forward is entirely on Trump. And the magic trade deals (x China) will mostly benefit the Trump family businesses.
Thanks maddow!
the IMF wrote
lol, going with that are you?
>IMF Report: Trump Trade War Will Hurt Both U.S. and Global Economies
1. Yes. We know that.
2. This is quite a change from last week's 'tariffs are just punching yourself in the face' isn't it. It's almost like you're coming to the realization that tariffs may not be an end in themselves but are being used as tools to change policies across the world.
Tariffs are being used as tools to change policy around the world
Haha. How's that going so far? Trump's done nothing but surrender every time markets vomit his babble. Supposedly, one aim re China was IP theft of tech. So what does Trump do when Apple is too dependent on China supply -- suspends tech tariffs. So what's the leverage re the policy I stated above? Or is the goal to reshore manufacture of Tshirts and Xmas tree baubles to the US?
Japan (probably the most important deal needed outside the China/Canada/Mexico trio) met with the US and the US couldn't even state their objective. They just asked what are you offering?
This is clownville. On the bright side - your ilk still has no clue that this is clownville. So you got four more years of painful learning experience ahead of you
Yes, we have all been exposed to your “wisdom” over the years.
Sure follow the "science". Trust the "experts". There is currently no "trade war" and if there were none of these regime mouthpieces has any idea about what would happen.
Hurts the Foreign Goods Tax-Exemption.
Which allows sensible Tax-Cuts on the Domestic US economy.