Kamala Harris Promotes Federal Pot Legalization As a Boon to Black Men
Although the framing is a transparent political ploy, it is reassuring to see that the vice president has not abandoned her opposition to the federal ban.

Kamala Harris, the first major-party presidential candidate to support repeal of the federal ban on marijuana, is presenting that step as part of her "agenda to give Black men the tools to build wealth and achieve financial freedom, lower costs for themselves and their families, and protect their rights." Whatever you think of that framing, which is a transparent ploy to lure African-American voters who might be tempted to vote for Donald Trump, it is reassuring that the vice president has not abandoned her advocacy of national legalization, which she backed as a California senator in 2018 and 2019.
Unlike President Joe Biden, who touted his "marijuana reform" but resisted the idea of descheduling cannabis, Harris promises to "legalize marijuana at the federal level to break down unjust legal barriers that hold Black men and other Americans back." That position also sets her apart from Trump, who has endorsed recreational legalization in Florida but has not said anything about resolving the conflict between state and federal marijuana laws.
Harris' proposal is short on details, but it sounds like her legalization plan includes expungement of marijuana-related criminal records and "social equity" provisions that aim to assist would-be cannabis suppliers from communities disproportionately harmed by the war on drugs. Both of those were elements of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act, a bill she introduced in 2019.
That bill would have created "an automatic process" for "the expungement, destruction, or sealing of criminal records for cannabis offenses." It also would have created "a trust fund to support various programs and services for individuals and businesses in communities impacted by the war on drugs," using revenue from a 5 percent federal tax on cannabis products.
Harris envisioned a Community Reinvestment Grant Program, which would provide grants to "administer services for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs," and an Opportunity Trust Fund, which would "assist small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals." The latter fund also would have supported state and local "equitable licensing" programs aimed at "minimiz[ing] barriers to cannabis licensing and employment for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs."
Expungement would be a welcome complement to legalization. During his 2020 campaign, Biden promised to "automatically expunge all prior cannabis use convictions," and he later claimed he was "expunging thousands of convictions." But that was not true, since expungement of federal records would require new legislation.
"Equitable licensing," by contrast, is a well-meaning but misguided concept that unfairly puts qualified applicants at a disadvantage, distorts the cannabis market, and delays the rollout of legalization. Harris says her current plan will create "opportunities for Black Americans to succeed in this new industry." While working with Congress to legalize "the safe cultivation, distribution, and possession of recreational marijuana," she says, she will strive to ensure that "Black men—who have, for years, been overpoliced for marijuana use—are able to access wealth and jobs in this new market."
According to a Gallup poll conducted last October, 70 percent of Americans—including 87 percent of Democrats, 70 percent of independents, and 55 percent of Republicans— support marijuana legalization. As relevant here, Gallup put support among "people of color" at 72 percent. A Pew Research Center poll conducted in January found less support for recreational legalization: 57 percent overall. Notably, support was especially strong among black respondents, 65 percent of whom said marijuana should be legal for both recreational and medical use.
In a roundup of cannabis industry reactions to Harris' stance, Forbes writer Iris Dorbian quotes Ethos Cannabis CEO Gibran Washington, who welcomed the candidate's plan as a "landmark shift that will catalyze both industry growth and scientific advancement." Anthony Coniglio, CEO and president of NewLake Capital Partners, which serves marijuana businesses, was more cautious, noting that legalization will require politically iffy congressional action. "While we applaud Harris' commitment to addressing the harm caused by the War on Drugs and the disproportionate impact of mass incarceration on communities of color," he said, "it remains unclear if there will be enough bipartisan support to fully realize her reform proposals."
Sundie Seefried, CEO of SHF Holdings, which provides financial services to the cannabis industry, noted that "states have developed their own regulatory frameworks over years, and forcing them to adjust to federal standards could create substantial complications." Although "the intent is good," she said, the "significant challenges" posed by reconciling state and federal regulations could "delay progress for the industry."
Will highlighting her support for federal legalization help Harris with wavering black voters? If Trump is worried, there is a straightforward way to neutralize any advantage the issue might give her. He could reinforce his avowed support for marijuana federalism by joining her in opposing the main obstacle to it.
[This post has been updated with additional discussion of expungement and "social equity" programs.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
She plagiarized this too?
She has no original thoughts. At least nothing coherent comes from that little retarded nugget between her ears.
VP Harris queefs a lot
Has she thought about giving out rims, watermelon, fried chicken? Why stop at just one stereotype?
Trump has had bullshit charges filed against him, has kids with multiple baby mommas, and survived a shooting. His street cred will help fortify the urban males intending to vote for him.
The mug shot did more harm to his opponents than it did to Trump.
And for someone that oversaw the prosecution that imprisoned marijuana users, her statement might ring hollow for some.
Pretty sure it's spelled "hypocrite", but don't tell Sullum.
Yeah, how much hot sauce does she have in her purse?
right? No one on her campaign thought linking black men and recreational weed might not be the best optics? I'm all for legal weed but this is just stupid.
this is worse than "they wanna put y'all back in chains"
"yo, my black homies, you love da chronic doncha"
Unbelievable
She authored the opposition to the California legalization proposal.
1900 black men were charged with pot possession during her reign as DA. Far more than the DA's preceding and succeeding her.
I'm sure that they now all feel comforted by the fact that she has "evolved".
Bro, don't be weird. Her values haven't changed.
She's just unburdened by what has been.
She doesn't want people to spend time in prison for marijuana, unless of course she needs them to fight wildfires for 10 cents a day. In which case they need to stay in prison past their parole dates.
A "boon to black men"? Is a boon some sort of ghetto thing? Or slang?
Let’s assume it was racist. So now Reason has to fire Sullum.
did you call me a boon?
Skin color is the most important thing.
Make the enemy play by his own rules.
Yes. A boon is very similar to hitting a dinger.
Glad I could help.
"Kamala Harris Promotes Federal Pot Legalization As a Boon to Black Men."
What a bunch of racist bullshit.
Most of the pot growers and distributers are not black.
Harris pandering to black voters, but I'm sure most of them recognize she's in dire need of an enema.
You think this might blackfire and there will be some blacklash?
She will not eliminate the black market.
This is a black eye on the situation.
“Hey my Black brothas, you wanna get hiiiiiiiiiiigggggghhhhhh?”
"You're the worst character ever, Kammie."
She’s such a towel.
idk how you can seriously believe the Ruling Class favors a federal ban on anything ever ... maybe free speech & guns, but weed?
No mention of he accompanying $20K "forgivable" loans for blacks only?
Well, that would require a libertarian site to unabashedly disqualify her as a voting option. And we can't have that. This is the most election of our lifetime.
It's time for another good idea bad idea.
Good idea: Kamala Harris Promotes Federal Pot Legalization...
Bad idea:...As a Boon to Black Men
https://youtu.be/2dJOIf4mdus?si=Fu4SRdyJHgqk_RSb
Kamala Harris Promotes Federal Pot Legalization As a Boon to Black Men
*looks around room*
So... As long as marijuana remains a "black thang", we're all for relaxing the prohibition?
This rather reminds me of a little incident in England where they introduced some kind of crazy-pants LGBTQI2MAP+ education module thingy in the classroom and then, after a very intense boycott from huge swathes of schools that were in largely Muslim areas, the British school officials raced– and I mean raced to yank the program. Some clever commenter here wrote something I’ve never forgotten: If you want your political issue to get attention, make damned sure the spokesperson for your grievance is a woman in a hijab…
So, “Black men could get ahead if not for all the marijuana prosecutions.” is the pro-legalization narrative we’re going with?
Good to see we’ve abandoned the anti-racism. Seems like I’ve seen a number of ‘police misconduct’ here on Reason recently and virtually none were explicit to MJ. I’m sure the concerns about the community centers in low income neighborhoods being overrun by immigrants* and how that might be holding them back as well will go up in a puff of smoke.
*Clarification for the retarded: This is just one example, as with homelessness, virtually never are there just one or two policies dragging down lower-class communities, if the policies themselves are responsible at all.
This is what happens when black men have had enough of being held back... one working Black Man did more in 10 minutes to tear down the Seattle CHAZ protest than the entire city leadership could do in weeks.
Trigger warning: If there's any confusion about who's who, who's on which side, just look for the people wearing the not-just-talismans vs people who aren't as a guide...
Another guide is to look for those that appear to love nature, but spend very little time in it.
That Indian woman really, really hates black men.
Only half the time
and this from the gal that claimed some her bones were made jailing potheads. you can't make this shite up! i say she makes snood dogg her ganja czar. that way there will be at least ONE black in the admin
"While we applaud Harris' commitment to addressing the harm caused by the War on Drugs and the disproportionate impact of mass incarceration on communities of color," he said, "it remains unclear if there will be enough bipartisan support to fully realize her reform proposals."
Is this disproportionate impact on "communities of color" (JFC if there was ever a late-stage political bullshit list of phrases, this one would be very near the top) the same as the 'disproportionate impact' that enforcing child buggery laws we're told has on LGBTQI2MAP+ communities?
To address the problem of The Black Community getting ahead, I will eliminate the criminal regulation of pot. Now black men are free to achieve equally at the level of your average white pot smoker without fear of prosecution.
The racial aspect of this is just too hilarious. It almost overshadows the hilariousness of the fact that she has to do policy proposals via online update/press release because she’s not functionally literate enough to communicate them any other way.
Way to ruin a real issue by making it about race.
Kamala made it about race, you half wit.
I think that's what Sarcasmic was talking about. I *think* he was criticizing Kamala.
Of course I was. The woman is a disaster. Up until this one issue, all of her policy proposals have been ridiculously stupid. Finally she comes up with a decent one, and then has to make it about race. She could fuck up a wet dream.
"She could fuck up a wet dream."
...
Well, for damn sure no democrat would ever suggest removing the devil weed from schedule one because it has proven medicinal uses and it is therefore ILLEGAL for it to be on schedule one.
Get rid of the FDA and the DEA, then get back to me.
I propose, once again, the eternal question with her campaign: Why aren’t they doing it now?
They’ve conducted multiple coups against multiple sitting Presidents, forcing the most recent one to step aside. Marijuana legalization should be a blindfolded slam dunk on the Fisher-Price Adjustable EZ-score hoop.
I've had more than one canvasser and cold-caller tell me about what Kamala's "going to do" - and every time I say, "They're in power now. They could literally do it right this minute. Why don't they do it now?"
*click*
They aren’t serious about what they say.
I propose, once again, the eternal question with her campaign: Why aren’t they doing it now?
It’s the previous administrations fault!
Oh wait…
Cue: The Joy of Unburdening Soundtrack.
The Democrats are super pissed that they're losing the black vote in droves, so they figure if they can get and keep them high...
What an act of desperation. And make no mistake she will NEVER follow through on this stunt. And she'll somehow blame her inaction on Trump. There's no basement in Kamala Harris' world, no depth to low to plunge for such a bottom feeder.
Obama's second campaign, Reason got all giddy about 'gay rights' and 'pot legalization' when he said he wasn't against gay marriage and pot any more.
Did he do anything when elected? No, not a fucking thing. But they were all on board with him then.
>Although the framing is a transparent political ploy, it is reassuring to see that the vice president has not abandoned her opposition to the federal ban.
Sullum. *Jacob* - the woman bragged about throwing Black men in cages over pot.
She's as 'against the federal ban' as she was 'for criminal justice reform'. She'll say anything to get elected. Once in office she's not going to do anything.
Finally - if the President *can't do anything about a topic*, like, say, abortion, then why the fuck do we care what they think about the topic? Who cares what her stance on changing the drug laws is when multiple Presidents have said that only Congress can change the law here?
You think even if the President has the authority to reschedule a drug that *Kamala Harris* would be the one to do that? Really? *Really?*
Also, Sullum, let's say she does do this. Let's say that she does remove marijuana from the Schedule - how does this change anything for the person on the ground?
In most of the country possession and use aren't illegal anymore - only dealing.
So . . . the low-level dealers and users the feds weren't going after in the first place can breathe a smidgen easier?
Finally, Sullum, why aren't you asking why she hasn't been talking about this for the last three years? SHE IS THE INCUMBENT!
No longer reluctantly. Kamala says "marijuana legalization", Sullum says "Vote for Kamala!"
I'm glad to have Trump setting the pace, pointing the way.