New Anti-Trump Ads Highlight Sexual Assault Allegations, Portraying Him As an Admitted 'Serial Predator'
Although the Republican presidential nominee has denied those accusations, he has also bragged about strikingly similar behavior.

A new ad campaign sponsored by George Conway's Anti-Psychopath PAC features two women, Natasha Stoynoff and Jessica Leeds, who say former President Donald Trump sexually assaulted them. More than a dozen women have described similar encounters with the Republican presidential nominee, and their accounts are consistent with the behavior that Trump bragged about in the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced the month before the 2016 election. One of those women, journalist E. Jean Carroll, obtained a $5 million civil verdict against Trump last year after a New York jury concluded it was more likely than not that he had sexually assaulted her in 1996.
With the exception of the Carroll verdict, all of this information was available to voters in 2016. They nevertheless elected a man who had been credibly described as a sexual predator—by himself as well as his accusers. It therefore seems doubtful that reminding voters of all this will make a difference in this year's election. Yet the crimes that Carroll et al. allege are far more troubling than Trump's 34 felony convictions, which Trump's Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, highlights by depicting the race as a contest between a prosecutor and a felon.
Trump's status as a convicted felon is based on bookkeeping offenses that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg converted into felonies via a convoluted, legally iffy theory that combined several interacting statutes with questionable assumptions about Trump's knowledge and intent. The victims in that case, Bragg said, were American voters, who supposedly had a right to hear porn star Stormy Daniels' account of consensual sex with Trump before they cast their ballots in the 2016 presidential election. According to Bragg, that purported right was violated by the nondisclosure agreement that Trump paid Daniels to sign.
The allegations of sexual assault, by contrast, feature specific, identifiable victims whose rights Trump indisputably violated if these accounts are true. Unlike the 2006 tryst that Daniels described, these alleged encounters were decidedly not consensual.
Stoynoff, then a writer at People magazine, interviewed Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 2005. "At one point," she says in one of the new TV spots, "Melania went upstairs to change her clothes for the next photo shoot, and Trump said to me, 'I want to show you this beautiful painting, this beautiful room.' He leads me to this room, pushes me against the wall, and starts kissing me forcefully. I tried to push him. He kept coming back at me. I was in shock and smothered. He had his hands here, against my shoulders. I felt sick inside. I felt horrified."
According to Stoynoff, the assault was interrupted when "a butler" entered the room. Later, she says, as "Melania was approaching," Trump said, "You know we're going to have an affair, don't you?"
Leeds, a former stockbroker, says she encountered Trump during a 1979 airplane trip. After a flight attendant told Leeds a seat was available in first class, she says in another ad, she found herself sitting next to Trump. "The airplane took off," she says, "and all of a sudden Donald Trump started groping me. He was trying to kiss me, and I'm trying to push him away. He was basically overpowering me. When he started putting his hand up my skirt, I got out of the seat, grabbed my purse, and went back to my original seat. I certainly was shook up by the whole thing."
Two years later, Leeds says, she saw Trump at a fundraiser: "He looked at me, and he said, 'I remember you. You're that cunt from the airplane.'"
Trump denies these accusations and all of the others. But he described strikingly similar behavior in his 2005 conversation with Access Hollywood host Billy Bush, which was recorded by a hot mic while both men were off camera. "I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]," Trump said. "I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait." When "you're a star," he added, "they let you do it. You can do anything.…Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.'
Trump dismissed that conversation as "locker-room banter." He averred that "Bill Clinton has said far worse to me on the golf course" but added, "I apologize if anyone was offended."
The problem, of course, was not that Trump had uttered the word pussy. It was that he had boasted about sexually assaulting women. And unlike the women he described, who supposedly let him "do anything" because he was "a star," women such as Leeds and Stoynoff say they physically resisted, which did not seem to faze him.
If you are determined to vote for Trump, none of this will faze you either. You can dismiss all of Trump's accusers as politically motivated liars. You can discount a New York jury's verdict against him, which included a judgment that Trump had defamed Carroll by insisting that she made the whole thing up, for similar reasons. But if you are on the fence, disinclined to vote for Harris because you disagree with many of her positions but not too crazy about Trump either, the argument that he is an admitted "serial predator" who "views women as for his entertainment" and has "said it, point blank" (as Leeds puts it) might give you pause.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The duopoly is putting on quite the clown show.
Sanders and Cheney. Together at last.
Listen to what they say abt each other, then listen to Chase Oliver. LP spoiler votes are what repeal bad Kleptocracy lies.
BS:dr
What does BS:dr mean?
BullShit;Didn't read?
That or a typo for "Jacob Sullum; didn't read". If that's not a difference without a distinction.
I don’t always agree with Jacob but at least he brings up topics others don’t have the courage to discuss.
You say "agree with Jacob" and "discuss" like he isn't an insane person ranting against the voices in his head whether you agree or not.
As I (and others) indicate below, he can't hold a consistent principle throughout the article *and* the whole idea assumes an unrealistic or unintelligible set of sexual mores that nobody, or society, could uphold even if they wanted to.
You might want to see a mental health professional for a few weeks to help you work through your feelings, son.
Reason should sponsor a group therapy session for H&R commentors.
A cry for help if I ever heard one.
I would be happy to facilitate the group. Maybe we can get a few of the turd sippers, er, chippers to participate.
Be sure to set out enough chairs for all of shrike's sock names.
"Reason should sponsor a group therapy session"
Say Buttplug, why did Reason permaban your original account?
So we can address your pedophilia?
I'm sorry your education has left you without critical thinking skills and the impression that I'm the one who's ranting about feelings here, but you might want to see a third grade reading teacher about your reading comprehension, son.
Regardless of my, yours, or anyone's feeling, Sullum hops between "letting" and "assault", highlighting the difference and then insisting on the similarity, without any sort of evidence or logic one way or the other.
Maybe in the reality you live in, this is some sort of well-reasoned argument or informal adjudication of the 'facts' or implication of guilt of... something, but in the reality the rest of us share, Sullum's 'piece' is, at best, an insane, rambling, rant.
Do you need an explanation of why "no means no" was abandoned as a useful slogan decades ago?
I didn’t ask. Are you telling us you’ve abandoned ‘no means no’ and that you don't believe in it even as a slogan, let alone an actual standard?
Yeah. There’s a complete dearth of anti Trump articles out there,
This is a libertarian mag. We have our own candidate, neither a nazi nor a communist (for a change). Vote for coercion and guess what you get?
... Ten seconds Incontinente...
Willful ignorance.
So you’re finally admitting it?
It means if mine eye offendeth me...
Same. Sullum is a piece of shit. And I’ll bet he furiously masturbated while he wrote it.
Let’s get back to the DeSantis articles.
George Conway's Anti-Psychopath PAC
Catchy name.
Holds the same weight as "Anti-Racist".
Racists are created, while psychopaths are just born that way.
Anti-racists, anti-psychopaths, and anti-fascists are all what they claim to oppose. All leftist hypocrisy.
Do you oppose racists, psychopaths and fascists? Yes? Well then. You are what you oppose you racist, fascist, psychopathic leftist hypocrite.
People call you a racist, psychopath and fascist because of shit like this, Sarckles:
sarcasmic 10 hours ago
Screw being humane. Whip out a machete and swipe off the head, then laugh as it runs around with blood squirting up into the air before landing on the heads of screaming children. I’d register to vote for that guy.
sarcasmic 13 mins ago
I had CPS called on me because I said sometimes dragged my kid’s feet off the bed to get her to get up. CPS said it was reported that I was “Laying hands on my child in a concerning way.”
sarcasmic
June.7.2022 at 12:19
Girls who dress slutty and get passed out drunk at parties shouldn't be surprised if bad things happen.
sarcasmic 1 year ago
LET JESSEAZ AND FRIENDS CUT AND PASTE TO SHOW IM A LIAR ABOUT COCAINE AND CAN’T BE TRUSTED ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE
QUOTE IT BITCHES!!!!
sarcasmic
January.22.2022 at 9:05 am
Nothing says liberty like sucking down a scorpion bowl or two while driving home from getting takeout.
sarcasmic
September.9.2021 at 11:59 am
I’M EVERYONE AND EVERYWHERE!!!!!!! I DONT EAT OR SHIT OR PISS OR FUCK OR NOTHING!!!!! ALL I DO IS POST UNDER MULTIPLE NAMES 24/7!!! I HAVEN’T BEEN TO THE BATHROOM IN WEEKS!!!!
Sarc has imaginary friends:
sarcasmic
September.28.2021 at 7:08 pm
But please keep projecting. My lurker friends get a good laugh out of it.
sarcasmic 9 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Nice use of the weasel word “actual.”
Prep. Sarc is a pretty fucked up piece of work. And a worthless degenerate drunk.
No links or context from a crybaby who cries like a baby whenever anyone does the same thing to Victim Trump the crybaby.
Get a new hobby.
Like getting blackout drunk every day and ranting about how much you hate Trump?
"No links or context"
Wait, you want me to post the links, Sarckles? Bold and risky move, but your bluff failed:
https://reason.com/2022/11/21/sam-bankman-fried-journalism-funding-crypto-fraud-media/?comments=true#comment-9803861
https://reason.com/2022/06/07/drag-shows-for-children-under-fire-in-texas/?comments=true#comment-9531636
https://reason.com/2022/06/07/drag-shows-for-children-under-fire-in-texas/?comments=true#comment-9531636
https://reason.com/2021/09/13/house-democrats-tax-bill-lavishes-subsidies-on-local-news/?comments=true#comment-9100935
https://reason.com/2022/01/22/new-yorks-liquor-store-lobby-fights-against-to-go-drink-sales-by-bars-restaurants/?comments=true#comment-9318314
https://reason.com/2021/09/09/california-is-set-to-outlaw-unannounced-condom-removal/#comment-9091932
https://reason.com/video/2021/09/28/why-you-should-fear-big-government-more-than-big-tech/#comment-9129090
https://reason.com/2022/11/14/bankrupt-crypto-exchange-ftx-under-investigation/?comments=true#comment-9792529
Bonus:
https://reason.com/2022/12/30/new-york-city-mayor-eric-adams-wants-you-to-love-big-brother/?comments=true#comment-9855537
Will sarc continue his White Mike sea lion cos play?
I'm rubber, you're glue, has evolved.
Like the extra votes for Biden, this one was mailed in.
All well known. Nothing to see here.
Now that bromance with Vlad? That needs to be publicized.
What happened to your original account?
Trump's bromance with vlad includes that time he got caught on hot mic saying he'd have more leverage after the election, right?
No no, it's the time he let Putin just run over to a nearby country to try and take it.
No, it's the time he called Vlad the brave president of Ukraine.
Remember when Putin publicly endorsed Trump for presi...
Oh wait, that was Kamala.
3D Chess, Comrade.
Its a tragedy that despite Trump being a man of low moral character and incredible flaws, we would be better off under his administration than under Biden/Harris.
Really? You prefer the guy, Trump, who took a good economy and ran it to a dep recession to the guy, Biden, who brought the economy back? Trump is incompetent that why he was fired in 2020 and you hire him back rather than vote for a woman.
F. You're not even trying anymore.
F-
Parody.
"Biden, who brought the economy back?"
Do these bot accounts actually think we can't remember the Covid lockdowns?
Little yellow bus territory.
Everything you wrote is total bullshit. Democrat fan fiction.
You’re a lying sociopathic deviant. No wonder you’re a democrat toadie.
Oh, and refuted.
Really who refuted the fact that Trump trashed the economy, sowed chaos, and was fired?
Everyone here, including myself. Dozens of times, and directly to you.
M’kay bitch?
Yeah, sure, the COVID virus out of Wuhan China and the over-reaction mandates by CDC shutting down the U.S. education and economy for two years were the fault of Trump's economic policy. I guess a Democrat economic policy would not have allowed a surprise pandemic virus out of Wuhan.
Jesus are you dense. What does Trumps businesses have to do with him running the country? Running an economy that all of us benefited in and if you think Biden has brought the economy back you are not in touch with reality.
m4e is competing with jeffsarc for dumbest post of the day?
The Gee Oooh Peee was butthurt and ANGRY that Herbert Hoover lost, beer was legalized, Prohibition was repealed and Hitler criticized by the Dems after they won on the 1931 Liberal Party repeal plank. Search "Moratorium On Brains" "Narcotics Limitation Convention" and Hoovervilles
It's a tragedy for women that for all the Amy Coney Barretts, Tulsi Gabbards, Nikki Haleys, and even Belle Knoxes out there, Harris or Clinton and Harris are the archetypes they've gotten to stack up against him.
Legions of women like Sandra Day O'Connor and Margaret Thatcher that Trump voters would punch Trump in the face for disrespecting and they choose the slimiest lawyers/politicians, that no one owes any apologies to, that they could find.
Ok, I think I see a spark of sanity. I believe we may now allow you to sit unbound to your chair during our group counseling sessions. Don’t make a liar out of me!
I propose electroshock treatments for the democrat commenters.
You’ll allow someone to do something during the brainwashing session you’ve set up in your own head? How magnanimous of you. The fact that you would try to hold me responsible for your dishonesty speaks volumes, more than I could, both as your self-supposed role as any sort of arbiter of sanity and as a moral agent.
Obligatory, Reason-commentary brand retort to such mentality: Fuck off, slaver.
Hang in there, help is on the way. Just might have to adjust our treatment strategies and move lobotomies to the front of the line!
zooneedles is Queenie's new persona? Malika?
Whose sock are you?
I’m unfamiliar with those or that individual(s), Gomer. I think it’s been somewhere around ten years since I’ve had a persona here at reason. How about you? I’m thinking you could benefit from a few of our counseling sessions. Still having nightmares from boot camp, private?
Interacting with Trumpanzees is kinda like making OOK OOOK noises in front of the baboon cage at the zoo. They still replay the same tapes over and over just as Mencken described in "A Religious Orgy in Tennessee."
I’m not sure which is worse these days though, their varying psychosis seems to permeate the entire duopoly. Hence I continue to stand outside the monkey cage attempting to bring sanity to the zoo.
"Its a tragedy that despite Trump being a man of low moral character and incredible flaws"
And yet they found a woman of even lower moral character and with even bigger flaws to oppose him.
Plus she’s incredibly stupid.
I don't think she is stupid. I think she is filled with hubris and a classic example of a midwit. As Ronald Reagan said "it's not that she doesn't know anything, it's that so much of what she knows isn't true" (sic)
On the topic of questionable decisions involving sex, the idea that such a discussion favors Harris is only due to the media (including here) being completely in the tank for the Democratic Party. Sullum sleeps at the bottom of said tank.
The E. Jean Carroll stuff was a joke. She's got about the same credibility as Ryan Routh. Slightly crazier than the guy who just tried to assassinate him is not a good look.
The E. Jean Carroll stuff was a joke. She’s got about the same credibility as Ryan Routh. Slightly crazier than the guy who just tried to assassinate him is not a good look.
Leeds' story triangulates about the same or between Carroll's and Blasey-Ford's (if not more insane). Doesn't know the exact year almost 50 fucking years ago, may've been a salesperson or stock broker at the time, would've been several years older than Trump and Ivana at the time, alleges he made a move in a relatively open public space, didn't, apparently, file charges or take any action at the time despite the fact that such action would've been totally acceptable and there was no reason for her not to (beyond her not finding what he, supposedly, did to be beyond social norms)...
The fact that the best case they could come up with against Trump was E. Jean Carroll says a lot. If they had any other woman come forward with a credible case, we would have heard it by now. They like throwing out the number of claims against him but they never go into details. Trump has been in the public eye for decades. He has no secrets at this point.
The judge allowed 4 other women to testify in the trial of untried claims. Something against all judicial norms.
There's been a lot of upending judicial norms lately.
The Democrats aren't going to like the new precedents they've established if they do lose establishment power.
Some payback will be necessary. Maybe we can explore involuntary commitment for democrats like AOC.
Not just untried, but, despite Robby’s assertions about superficial credibility, non-falsifiable.
Veracity vs. verisimilitude or, alternatively, valid vs. verified. Trump assaulted Leeks on an airplane or a celestial teacup (or teakettle). The airplane may be more believable than the celestial teacup but, without having any better idea as to which airplane, it may as well be any airplane, or teacup, between the surface of the Earth and The Moon.
Some might not like it to be said but Trump does not have a habit of chasing after ugly, crazy women.
Take it from an anonymous masked MAGAt with no publications to its credit.
"he has also bragged about strikingly similar behavior."
I've personally done a lot of things that would be strikingly similar to rape... were it not that they were consented to! Isn't that kind of the dividing line here, once you exclude statutory rape?
By today's standards, a fair portion of Mrs. Casual and I's relationship in college was composed of mutual rape.
Surprise sex as Buttplug calls it.
Although his involves a van that smells vaguely of chloroform and prepubescent boys.
So they 'let you do it' huh? Didn't Trump qualify his off the record comments the same way?
I can't say I have either in the military, college or when I got out but any of the woman I had mutual sex with could under the E. Jean Carroll precedent, come after me 30 or 40yrs later and accuse me of sexual assault. How am I supposed to defend myself against that especially against charges the woman isn't clear about and details she herself has forgotten.
their accounts are consistent with the behavior that Trump bragged about in the Access Hollywood tape
...
The problem, of course, was not that Trump had uttered the word pussy. It was that he had boasted about sexually assaulting women. And unlike the women he described, who supposedly let him "do anything" because he was "a star," women such as Leeds and Stoynoff say they physically resisted, which did not seem to faze him.
WTF is wrong with you? You can't even agree with *your own premise* for two full sentences.
Being unable to recognize that you're writing about the very thing that distinguishes what makes conduct criminal versus lawful is completely consistent with Sullum's legal analysis on most matters related to Trump.
I'm raising a glass here as I watch Reason's last shred of credibility circle the drain.
Please do so strategically and reluctantly.
Like the Reason staff’s forthcoming votes for Harris?
A glass of hemlock?
Well I was going to enjoy a refreshing adult beverage anyway but then Jacob took a big dump and I had to flush twice.
If you are determined to vote for Trump, none of this will faze you either. You can dismiss all of Trump's accusers as politically motivated liars. You can discount a New York jury's verdict against him, which included a judgment that Trump had defamed Carroll by insisting that she made the whole thing up, for similar reasons.
Not "can", "will".
Alternatively, male Trump voters accept that Trump is a sexual predator but it's ok when Trump does it and they just wish they could do it - and get away with it. Trump is their fantasy - be rich, have hot wives and mistresses and access to other hotties, watch teenage girls in their underwear (or less), and tell everyone to fuck themselves, They know they can't be that, but they can vote for the man who is.
Seems better than to admire the guy who sniffs little girl’s hair.
Neither are due admiration independent of sexual allegations.
Biden serially molested his daughter in the shower. By her own admission. But somehow that gets memory hoked and the ludicrous unsupported claims by a total nutcase are somehow ‘credible’.
What about all those white women we kept hearing about who voted for Trump? I guess they have fantasies about being sexually violated by a tycoon. (/sarc)
Dunno. Dillinger's the expert on the subject, I think lol
Sure thing Shrike.
“male Trump voters accept that Trump is a sexual predator but it’s ok when Trump does it and they just wish they could do it – and get away with it.”
Sarckles-tier projection, Diet Shrike.
Also, by that logic do male Kamala voters just wish they could get Willie Brown to plow them?
No bitch. Its just that the democrats came up with the flimsiest possible case brought forward by a lying nutcase who couldn’t even remember the year it happened and claimed to where an outfit that didn’t even exist in the time range it was up posed to have happened. Among other inconsistencies.
You’re nothing more than a propagandist cunt for vacuously puking up this utterly false narrative. We should deport you to Somalia for that.
I certainly will. I'm of the opinion that any claim of sexual assault more than a few months old should be immediately dismissed. That dizzy broad tried to dredge up something from 30yrs ago, had her lawsuit backed by a billionaire dedicated to go after Trump and filed it in a place a guilty verdict was assured. All of this after a trial in which she couldn't remember any details. Nothing but claims that sound like a movie script and a bad one at that.
The nicest thing about voting Libertarian is the bawling of the lewsers! If the Libertarian candidate covers the spoiler gap in enough States to rattle and rethrow the electoral votes, we WIN again! The Dems, after all, discarded some crappy planks since 2016. The Nazis instead chose to invade and sabotage the LP--yet the genuine article STILL got the nomination. The wisdom of Jesus Anschluss will be apparent if the Nazis lose after bolting from Gee Oooh Pee ranks shifts those vote totals juuuuust enough to again slap down the Klan.
Reason - Hey, look at this campaign ad.
Retards - Leftist tReason totally supports this campaign ad.
Binary thinking.
The right/left binary only exists in your retarded little head.
Don’t know that he’s “developmentally delayed” at this point, he generally seems to be of at least average or slightly above average intellectually but sadly you do seem to be correct regarding the duopoly.
More DNC propaganda from Jacob the Liar.
Just admit that he is a sexual predator but you don't care. It would be more honest.
I’m willing to admit he has an enviable sex life, but probably less so than Hugh Hefner did.
That reveals more about you than you might wish. Evidently you envy men who sexually assault women.
What utter fucking garbage. E. Jean Carroll’s story was heavily anachronistic and involved shitloads of retconning after she made her accusation.
Meanwhile, Tara Reade’s very credible testimony and Ashley Biden’s confirmed diary are pooh-poohed by you.
ML covered it. You’re a fucking propagandist liar Shrike. You don’t give a shit how horrible democrats are. It will be good when you’re gone.
Predator or a very rich and famous guy women threw themselves at?
You would think a ace reporter like Sullen would be all over this story.
https://detained-in-dubai.prowly.com/333039-tara-reade-arrives-in-us-amidst-biden-decline-to-make-criminal-referrals
When former Senate aide Tara Reade spoke publicly about her
sexual assault claims against Joe Biden, she was not met with the usual #MeToo support that women were receiving at the time. Instead, she was seen as an inconvenience, if not an enemy, to the democrat party who were rallying around Biden to become President.
Tara Reade was harassed, demonised and targeted by law enforcement who empanelled a grand jury and subpoenaed her social media communications. Tara had made complaints against Biden during the time of her employment but the administration refused to release from Delaware University where they are held, instead opting to damage her reputation.
Years after leaving her employment, and after going public, Tara released her book “Left Out, When The Truth Doesn’t Fit In”, attracting global interest. Her experience raised the attention of celebrities and politicians, ultimately leading Congressman Matt Gaetz and Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Green to suggest she testify in Congress.
Tara was invited to publish it in Russian for a wider audience and so made a short trip to Moscow, not realising it would turn her life upside down. During her short break, she was told she was at serious risk of arrest on her return to the States, that her life was at risk and they would rather lock her up than let her speak to Congress. She made the difficult decision of seeking asylum in Russia while her legal team fought to tackle the threats she faced.
“We immediately filed submissions with the United Nations and Interpol”, explains crisis manager Radha Stirling, CEO of Due Process International then instructed US attorney Dr Jonathan Levy to initiate actions against the FBI for weaponizing the justice system against a sexual assault victim on behalf of the President. “After over a year of actions, Tara Reade made an extremely challenging and risky decision to return to the US so she could attend her daughter’s wedding.
“We spoke extensively about the risks and did everything we could to mitigate them. It was good timing. With the debate approaching, it would be disadvantageous for the party to lock up another political opponent. The spotlight would be on Tara and what Biden did to her and we knew they wouldn’t want that.
"The spotlight would be on Tara and what Biden did to her and we knew they wouldn’t want that."
Yet I'm reading it here for the first time.
Maybe the spotlight wasn't as intense as they thought it would be. I wonder why that is.
"But they did it too!"
On the other hand, that makes me more determined than ever not to vote for Joe Biden, so thank you for that valuable public service.
You really are a vile. Sociopathic scumbag, no wonder you’re a democrat.
These same accusations didn't work in 2016, I don't understand why they think it would in 2024.
The Act Blue types are using the four boxes approach.
What’s old is new again. Desperation time for kammy.
It won’t work. Haha.
Packing Mutterkreuz Mom, Gorbasuch and KKKavanaugh onto the Suprema Corte to force doctors to let women die MIGHT make a difference, what with the 19th Amendment and recent girl-bullier election results. The 19th Amendment restated out loud what the 14th and 15th Amendments said before Klan reinterpretation in the Court. BTW… wasn’t Long Dong also a girl-bullier before being elevated by Orange Hitler?
The Derangement is strong in this one . . .
Isn’t this horse about dead enough already?
is your TDS also on full display with those other dbags @National Review? like in some tit-for-tat?
Imagine being the kind of democrat who voted for bill clinton and loves Kamala for being "Brat" and a hoe who worked her way into politics on top of Willie Brown's cock but the Trump's gives you the bad vibes about possible sexual impropriety . my god.
Okay, there's a lot to unpack here, but let's get started.
(1) Clinton's last election was 1996, the Monica scandal wasn't until 1998. He hasn't sought anyone's vote since the scandal.
(2) You're presuming that the people planning to vote for Harris and people who believe she is a "hoe" are the same people. It sees far more likely that the overlap in that particular Venn diagram is very small.
(3) Even if the accusations against Harris are true, you do realize that it would be describing a consensual relationship, right? And that the accusations about Trump are not describing consensual relationships? Do you understand how important that distinction is?
What does the phrase “they let you do it” mean?
That's from Trump's "locker room talk", not from the accusations of sexual assault against him.
So, FFnC/steel man, your “both sides” argument presumes consent and/or no abuse of power or impropriety on the one hand and guilt based on nothing but accusation on the other.
Understood.
Nah man, that's a whole new sentence.
I said I understood the dishonesty of parsing sentences, points, arguments, facts, baseless accusations, and objective impropriety favorably on the one hand and disfavorably on the other.
You don't have to keep doing it.
"Even if the accusations against Harris are true"
If? If they were true? Seriously?
If you think I've looked into the accusations against Harris enough to form a real opinion, you've vastly overestimating how much I care about rumors of a consensual relationship between adults.
Cared enough to defend against it in multiple posts and then admit you're arguing from ignorance.
Wtf. He was accused and paid off women he assaulted before his first campaign retard.
“(3) Even if the accusations against Harris are true”
The accusations are proven fact not in dispute. Its not that she a rapist, its that she is an incapable retard with not a shred of integrity that tries to pass herself off as some feminist icon when in reality she fucked powerful older Democrat men to get herself a career in politics. Her accomplishment is continually failing upwards on the backs of American citizens.
Which happened because she got ahead on her back. Which seems perfectly fine to democrats, who have no integrity or ethics. So obviously they cant see a problem.
Clinton had sexual scandals from his time as governor of Arkansas. One of George Stephanopoulos’s duties in his campaign was stamping down Bill’s “bimbo eruptions”.
Sockpuppets assigned to defecate in public on a libertarian magazine website are suboptimal candidates for nuanced distinctions on the initiation of force or definition of individual rights.
Speaking of assault (or worse), Gerald Goines was convicted.
https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/court/2024/09/25/500980/gerald-goines-verdict-harding-street-raid-houston/
+1 for “justice” I guess. Can’t wait to see what kind of sentence he gets.
I would be happy to have him join our group counseling sessions.
Goines, Goines, gone!
The Democrats had a huge issue to go after Trump with. Instead, they prosecuted him with that goofy trial over the hush payments. The Democrats have discredited themselves by the prosecution, and have neutered the argument about his stormy sex life.
Except the hush money trials had as much to do with his sex life as anything else. That money was intended to keep the American people from hearing more about his seamy behavior.
Which is legal.
It is legal and it could have been handled legally. The conviction is for trying to hide the fact by cooking the books. It also doesn't help to not let your own lawyers do their job. Trying to sell a BS story that you never had the affairs doesn't help you with the jury.
It was handled legally. Only made an issue to try and sideline him, and advanced by lying democrat propagandist filth, such as yourself.
Nothing was hidden. It wasn’t hidden from the federal election commission, the other beneficiaries of the trust, if any, or anyone else that had a right to know about it. No one was damaged by the payments, or how they were accounted for. Besides, Donald J Trump, Sr, wasn’t the one doing or supervising the bookkeeping or cutting the checks. He gave that all up when he was inaugurated.
Have some more KoolAid.
Whistle louder in the dark...
How are these anti-Trump ads which highlight sexual assault allegations different from the pro-Trump ads which highlight sexual assault allegations?
So you're just admittedly highlighting Democratic super PAC ads? Should there be some admission at the end of this that this is paid advertisement and that Kamala approves this message?
Except Goerge Conway is a conservative not a Democrat.
Hahahahahahaha
You’re dealing with binary thinkers who truly believe that anyone who doesn’t support Trump supports Harris, and that makes them a Democrat. Libertarians are Democrats. Greens are Democrats. Everyone who doesn't kiss the ballsack is a Democrat.
Sarc, always the idea man, never talks about people.
How did you ascertain that Sarc?
The alternative would be to add another dimension to the monofilament. To Trumpanzees, length is a rocket science dimension, whereas area is a puzzling challenge and affront to their dementia. That's a YUGE obstacle to their acknowledging Chase Oliver's competition--especially on a votes-per-dollar scale!
no he’s not, you stupid cunt. He’s a neocon RINO. A collaborator. He’s filth, just as you are filth.
Although the Republican presidential nominee has denied those accusations, he has also bragged about strikingly similar behavior.
No, he HAS NOT bragged about anything remotely similar.
Exactly. He said that he COULD have grabbed them by the pussy, because of his fame, and they wouldn’t have complained. Not that he had.
Suuure he hasn't.... Sullum or masked MAGAt sockpuppet? Which is the more persuasive attorney?
How very convenient for E. Jean Carroll to forget the date of the alleged rape.
Trump.might have had an alibi.
How cvery convenient for E. Jean Carroll to eait over twenty years to come forward.
Security camera footage could have verified her story.
Can’t verify total bullshit. But lack of proof is what a democrat plaintiff’s attorney, a Democrat judge, and a democrat jury are there to fix.
John Kennedy banged his 19 year old intern and forced her to have oral sex with his buddy in the White House pool..somehow if Reason was around then they would justify this as he isn't Trump.
And the irony that "cuties" defender is asking us to think about Trump's sexual shananigans. Oh the humanity..how about calling out the pedos and groomers calling to sexually mutilate mentally ill kids Jake? You know the sickos the Dems seem to always defend?
Cuties was just fine by you right?
Man, I am SO glad I don’t subscribe to Reason anymore. I pop over here now and then to see if there’s any hope, but the ship only sails deeper into the darkness. Here, a supposedly libertarian publication, is writing flat out propaganda pieces trying to usher in the statist, socialist puppet candidate installed through the most non-democratic process by a party that blatantly wields the judicial system as a political weapon against those it dislikes. Why? Because oh-no they found some women to say Trump is a boor. Including Carroll who flat out admitted on network television that she thinks rape is sexy. You probably still think the Steele dossier accusations were airtight and genuine. Reason, you guys are a joke.
How many Democrats and those sympathetic bought into the following argument?
"Even presidents have private lives. It is time to stop the pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into private lives and get on with our national life.
Our country has been distracted by this matter for too long, and I take my responsibility for my part in all of this. That is all I can do.
Now it is time -- in fact, it is past time to move on.
We have important work to do -- real opportunities to seize, real problems to solve, real security matters to face."
- Bill Clinton
That is where the name of MoveOn.org came from.
Sullum you fucking retard, I discount Carrol's sequence of events because she went on live TV and bragged about her rape fantasy kink.
RavingShriek exemplifies MAGAt IQ.
SEE? Republicans HAVE to rely on intimidation, enslavement and rape. No women (other than hookers and harridans) will willingly have anything to do with them. Jesus Caucus infiltrators are tasked with tarbrushing the LP by association with mystical girl-bulliers. This has alienated nearly all women (other than Lebensborn Nazis) from the LP.
You know, it's bad enough that libertarians like Jake refuse to bathe. But does he also have to drag in the stink of pathetic desperation in as well?
I think Trump, like most people running for high office, is a cretin, but this is incredibly weak sauce that would have been discounted or at least heavily qualified if it was anyone but Trump.